Core 2 Quad & Phenom 9500...

EdzAviator

Member
Mar 22, 2005
186
0
0

Many on newegg reviewers claim that the reviews made on Q6600 against the Phenom 9500 is not fair considering the fact that Q6600 runs @ stock 2.4 & Phenom 9500 runs @ 2.2....

If the reviews say that clock for clock performance, Phenom is behind the Q6600..that make really interesting cause a 2.4 & 2.2 is really not of the same clock...

But the problems is that there is no C2Q running @ 2.2.....

Is there a review between the Phenom 9500 & Xeon X3210 w/c runs stock @ 2.13Ghz...

Now that would be interesting w/c wud be a better Price/Performance..??

Xeon X3210 is currently price @ $ 246.99 in newegg & using LGA775....

Phenom 9500 is in that price range before but the current price cut made it to $200...

I wonder how much of a difference in performance Xeon X3210 & Phenom 9500 will be..??
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Why not just slightly downclock the Q6600 to 2.2 and do a review? Not a real hard thing to do...
 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
How are you looking at it though? Are you talking about stock for stock?

I mean - I've heard there are people out there that don't OC, and those people are crazy any way. You have different kind of people, they fit into categories.

1) Your layman - this person doesn't assemble computers any way and buys dell
2) Your weirdo - assembles his own but doesn't OC - why not just become #1 or simply learn yourself a bit more and be #3.
3) Your enthusiest - assembles his own, OC's his own

Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Now onto my argument, which completely ignores the weirdo's.

The Phenom is a POS when it comes to OC'ing. They are saying that the 9500 @ 2.2 barely does 2.4 without too much trouble and if you're lucky you get 2.6 out of it.

1) Mild-Mid OC'er. Doesn't wanna fuss too much, just set a few things in bios and get a bit extra, Bam
2) More-so OC'er. Messes with it a bit more to get the most out of it even though he has to raise voltages

Yes there are the exteme OC's out there which use more then Air - and there are many more sub categories there but most people are going to just use Air and aren't trying to break some record. So:

Then you have the Q6600 or if you like the x3120. Running 2.4 or 2.13 respectively. Without any problem at all the Q6600 (if its G0 stepping) is going to hit 2.80-3.0 and the x3120 will do the same, but lets say it is 2.6-2.8 without even raising voltages. Now how do you do the price comparissons?

I know it took a lot to explain my point, but frankly - the intel processors are so attractive because of their OC. You don't even have to try if you don't want to and EVERY G0 stepping, whether its the x3120 or the q6600 is going to hit 3.0 ghz without issue and on air.

All the reviews I've seen of the phenom they are lucky if they got the 9500 to 2.4 Ghz which, they are out there and the Q6600 stock still womps it so find those reviews. And then realize that you're at your almost max OC where as the Q6600 hasn't even begun.

Then we have the penryn coming next month at 45nm which is going to OC even more. The winner is clear for the enthusiest. And frankly, if you're not an enthusiest or gamer you 1) DON't need quad core, 2) probably should just go buy a dell, or 3) need to learn how to OC

/end long rant
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,523
2,859
136
"Many on Newegg".... thats solid enough reference for EdzAviators it seems.

Ehm, sorry fellow, but most reviews I've seen had at least a 2.4ghz Phenom, and if not the stock speed of the corresponding model, then an OC'd one to compare clock for clock with C2D/C2Q. I'm sure you're disappointed, but thats basically the case.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Phenom is utter garbage at this point. Hopefully the next revision does something great.
 

wraith3k

Senior member
Apr 15, 2004
310
0
76
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Are you joking? There are plenty of reasons why someone might build their own computer and not OC. And plenty of reasons why someone would build instead of buying a pre-built system. Building and OCing are independent of each other.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
Originally posted by: AMDZen
How are you looking at it though? Are you talking about stock for stock?

I mean - I've heard there are people out there that don't OC, and those people are crazy any way. You have different kind of people, they fit into categories.

1) Your layman - this person doesn't assemble computers any way and buys dell
2) Your weirdo - assembles his own but doesn't OC - why not just become #1 or simply learn yourself a bit more and be #3.
3) Your enthusiest - assembles his own, OC's his own
You forgot one category- those that buy Dell, and OC. (Pin-mod, etc.)


 

Dainas

Senior member
Aug 5, 2005
299
0
0
Originally posted by: amenx
"Many on Newegg".... thats solid enough reference for EdzAviators it seems.

haha, yeah. The only idiot-opinion fest on the interwebs that rivals youtube are the neanderthals posting product reviews on newegg.

 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
Originally posted by: theslug
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Are you joking? There are plenty of reasons why someone might build their own computer and not OC. And plenty of reasons why someone would build instead of buying a pre-built system. Building and OCing are independent of each other.

No I'm not joking. I'm sure there are reasons, and whatever those reasons are, they make zero sense to me. People can do what they want. Buying an Intel processor today and not OC'ing amounts to one of two things IMO - foolishness or naivety. If you don't know how, thats fine but you should take the time to learn.
 

Avalon

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2001
7,571
178
106
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: theslug
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Are you joking? There are plenty of reasons why someone might build their own computer and not OC. And plenty of reasons why someone would build instead of buying a pre-built system. Building and OCing are independent of each other.

No I'm not joking. I'm sure there are reasons, and whatever those reasons are, they make zero sense to me. People can do what they want. Buying an Intel processor today and not OC'ing amounts to one of two things IMO - foolishness or naivety. If you don't know how, thats fine but you should take the time to learn.

What the hell are you talking about?

Just to get this out of the way, I heavily OC all my CPUs...

First, that's got to be one of the most ignorant things I've heard someone say on these boards. There are plenty of reasons not to overclock. Maybe if you stopped to think what the side effects are of overclocking, you'd understand why tons of people build but don't OC.

1) The mild OC'er - If he uses stock cooling, he gains increased temps and louder fan speeds for marginal performance gains. If he uses 3rd party cooling, he's paying extra money to offset increased temps and fan speeds.

2) The heavy OC'er - Has to buy a 3rd party cooler, still generally experiences increased temps and fan speeds due to the heavy OC as opposed to running stock, and has to raise voltages.

And let's not forget the fact that when you overclock, you void your processors warranty? Should the CPU up and die within its 3 year (or 90 day) warranty, what are you going to do? RMA it and raise the costs of components? Waste money buying a new CPU? BTW, building your own PC and not OC'ing it often results in a cheaper and more powerful system than just resorting to getting a Dell.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: theslug
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Are you joking? There are plenty of reasons why someone might build their own computer and not OC. And plenty of reasons why someone would build instead of buying a pre-built system. Building and OCing are independent of each other.

No I'm not joking. I'm sure there are reasons, and whatever those reasons are, they make zero sense to me. People can do what they want. Buying an Intel processor today and not OC'ing amounts to one of two things IMO - foolishness or naivety. If you don't know how, thats fine but you should take the time to learn.

You can build a quad system with every component you want and you know every piece of hardware that goes into the system. You don't have to call Dell when something goes amiss. Also, you can build a PC much cheaper in the higher end by not going through Dell. Buying OEM parts etc.
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: theslug
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Are you joking? There are plenty of reasons why someone might build their own computer and not OC. And plenty of reasons why someone would build instead of buying a pre-built system. Building and OCing are independent of each other.

No I'm not joking. I'm sure there are reasons, and whatever those reasons are, they make zero sense to me. People can do what they want. Buying an Intel processor today and not OC'ing amounts to one of two things IMO - foolishness or naivety. If you don't know how, thats fine but you should take the time to learn.

how can it make zero sense. overclocking yields you minimal increases in real-world performance unless you're using your PC at load 24/7.
most people on these forums are either students or workers and aren't home for half the day.
overclocking also generates heat, some instability problems, voids warranties, and may require a $40-50 cooler to get you an extra 400mhz over stock. this translates to about 4% increase in performance.

in games there is a 1-2% increase from any overclock @ today's resolutions...
in video encoding you'll probably save yourself a few minutes on every movie...
nothing to see here
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Is this guy a moron did he not read reviews? Edz, they overclocked the Phenom to 2.4ghz and it was a lot slower so stop being an idiot. You are either an AMD employee or someone paid to be a moron or you're just a moron. Hell check Anandtech's review the q6600 beats even the 2.6ghz Phenom in more than just a few tests and it usually demolished the 2.4ghz Phenom by a bigger spread than 10%.
 

Kuzi

Senior member
Sep 16, 2007
572
0
0
How about comparing a Phenom at 3Ghz against a QX6850 (runs at 3GHz).

A friend of mine runs a computer store and was playing with Phenom 9600 for a month now, using different memory, Bios, and Mobos, he was finally able to get 3GHz stable OC.

I ran a few tests on his system, if anyone with a QX6850 could run these tests to compare, I would much appreciate it.

SuperPI 1M: 25.377s
wPrime 32M: 13.665s
Aquamark CPU: 14,801
Nuclearus: 14518
Cenbench 10 (32bit): 1xCPU: 2629 - 4xCPU: 10004

Sorry didn't have time to run other tests, maybe I'll run some games tests over the weekend.
 

j0j081

Banned
Aug 26, 2007
1,090
0
0
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: theslug
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Why don't people OC today? I don't know, those people don't make sense to me so I'm throwing those people out the window first and foremost. Especially today when the Intel processors are MONSTERS. You don't even need aftermarket cooling or have to raise the voltage AT ALL if your worried about that. You can still get a few extra out of the processors of today.

Are you joking? There are plenty of reasons why someone might build their own computer and not OC. And plenty of reasons why someone would build instead of buying a pre-built system. Building and OCing are independent of each other.

No I'm not joking. I'm sure there are reasons, and whatever those reasons are, they make zero sense to me. People can do what they want. Buying an Intel processor today and not OC'ing amounts to one of two things IMO - foolishness or naivety. If you don't know how, thats fine but you should take the time to learn.

well I only oc when it seems the performance increase is worth it. I don't see any point in running my pc overclocked if I'm not going to be doing anything intense on it for a long period of time. that's just increasing the chances of hardware failure in the long run isn't it?
 

Kuzi

Senior member
Sep 16, 2007
572
0
0
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Ah, gotcha. Maybe check this one to see if it's the 32-bit results you're seeking.

Yep those numbers can be compared, funny I checked that article just today, but forgot QX6850 was tested there also.

So for the multithreading Cinebench score QX6850 is about 9% faster than a similarly clocked Phenom, just what I expected. I'm guessing the single core numbers would look a bit worse for Phenom than that, maybe the difference would be 11-12%.

The QX9650 is about 15% faster than Phenom clock-for-clock in this test. I'm not sure how much of a difference are the larger caches having here.

Anyways thanks again.
 

Rayvin52

Junior Member
Oct 27, 2007
11
0
0
How about comparing a Phenom at 3Ghz against a QX6850 (runs at 3GHz).

A friend of mine runs a computer store and was playing with Phenom 9600 for a month now, using different memory, Bios, and Mobos, he was finally able to get 3GHz stable OC.

I ran a few tests on his system, if anyone with a QX6850 could run these tests to compare, I would much appreciate it.

SuperPI 1M: 25.377s
wPrime 32M: 13.665s
Aquamark CPU: 14,801
Nuclearus: 14518
Cenbench 10 (32bit): 1xCPU: 2629 - 4xCPU: 10004

Sorry didn't have time to run other tests, maybe I'll run some games tests over the weekend.


Ran wPrime32m on my QX6700 clocked to 3ghz on a 1333 fsb, which would be exactly the same as running a QX6850, and came up with 13.859...shows the Phenom to be right there, at least in this particular benchmark.
Also ran Aquamark and got 62,196, but that test's results depend heavily on the gpu, so shouldn't be used to compare the two cpu's at all...sorry, didn't have time to run any other tests.
 

flashMemory

Junior Member
Dec 19, 2007
4
0
0
I did the research and without the errata fix AMD gains an upper hand in some benches around 200mhz but loses in most about 200mhz. With the errata fix you can say that it loses at least 300mhz+ over core 2 clock for clock. Now some say that when phenom reaches higher clocks vs. a core 2 (3ghz + )the scalability in the cores starts to shine so that is something to look foward to if they ever manage to clock high. But it is only for apps that use 4 cores which is very few outside the server market.
 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
Originally posted by: Avalon
What the hell are you talking about?

Just to get this out of the way, I heavily OC all my CPUs...

First, that's got to be one of the most ignorant things I've heard someone say on these boards. There are plenty of reasons not to overclock. Maybe if you stopped to think what the side effects are of overclocking, you'd understand why tons of people build but don't OC.

1) The mild OC'er - If he uses stock cooling, he gains increased temps and louder fan speeds for marginal performance gains. If he uses 3rd party cooling, he's paying extra money to offset increased temps and fan speeds.

2) The heavy OC'er - Has to buy a 3rd party cooler, still generally experiences increased temps and fan speeds due to the heavy OC as opposed to running stock, and has to raise voltages.

And let's not forget the fact that when you overclock, you void your processors warranty? Should the CPU up and die within its 3 year (or 90 day) warranty, what are you going to do? RMA it and raise the costs of components? Waste money buying a new CPU? BTW, building your own PC and not OC'ing it often results in a cheaper and more powerful system than just resorting to getting a Dell.

I've OC'd every CPU I've ever owned and never had a single one go out on me. Maybe I'm just lucky then? As well as every single person I've taught how to OC and their perfect record as well? In fact, I've never even known a single person who OC's and has had a processor die on them as a result. This isn't to say I think it doesn't happen, but if you do all of the research before hand I sincerely doubt that my experience is the minority.

Besides I'm not talking about just any processor on the market, I'm talking about C2D and C2Q as a whole and namely current technology like G0 stepping vs. Phenom and how OC relates. You can make all these comments if you want and they may have applied to some processors over the past, but if you actually did the research you would know that G0 processors clock up fantastically and WITHOUT any extra cooling needed and WITHOUT raising the voltages.

So in how it relates to the C2D and C2Q, if you could OC any Q6600 G0 processor on the market to 3.0 Ghz without the need for anything but a stock cooler and without raising the voltages, what reason do you have left not to OC except foolishness and naivity. The only heat and power gains that are seen would be seen if you had bought the QX processor instead. Yes in order to get 3.6-3.8 type numbers you're going to want aftermarket cooling, but frankly I don't know anyone who has bought a C2D or C2Q processor on a machine they've built and not OC'd it.

Not to mention that the new Intel processors are so resilient, even when raising voltages to otherwise unheard of levels with other processors, having them die is exceedingly rare. People torture test these things with this goal going in and find that its quite difficult to do because of all the built in regulators the CPU's have. They will actually regulate voltages if they're too high by themselves. And if you read the new review on AT right now in regards to the QX9650 you will see that AT has recently discovered the same thing.

Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
how can it make zero sense. overclocking yields you minimal increases in real-world performance unless you're using your PC at load 24/7.
most people on these forums are either students or workers and aren't home for half the day.
overclocking also generates heat, some instability problems, voids warranties, and may require a $40-50 cooler to get you an extra 400mhz over stock. this translates to about 4% increase in performance.

in games there is a 1-2% increase from any overclock @ today's resolutions...
in video encoding you'll probably save yourself a few minutes on every movie...
nothing to see here

I'll refer you to everything I just said in regards to the new Intel processors. You can use the stock cooler and still get fantasitic gains. In the same Q6600 @ 3.0 ghz analysis your paying for a $260 processor and getting one that performs like a processor costing 4 or even 5 times as much. You don't need to raise voltages or get anything over stock cooling for decent gains with these things.

This next comment is said by someone who hasn't even bought an Intel processor since the original Pentium which I didn't actually buy it was in my first computer, since then I've owned nothing but AMD:

The fact is AMD is getting CRUSHED right now, when you factor in OC'ing it becomes a downright slaughter. And no amount of fanboyism will make that change for what could be a verylong time.