Originally posted by: Yoxxy
You all realize that this chip is a Core 2 Duo, that had one bad core right? You make more profit if you just disable the core and sell it as a single core rather then not making any money. That is why they have lowered the fsb as well, because a lot of conroes have problems with very high fsbs.
AMD has done this for quite some time with their single cores as well.
There will be some made that are just single core, but the vast majority are going to be failed dual cores.
Cheers.
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
At stock settings, the older E6300 and E6400 will probably outperform the E4300. The older chips also have EIST for what it's worth.
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
We have no idea what the E4xxx chips will be like OC-wise. Remember that those chips will have a different core than the E6xxx chips we're seeing now. No VT, no EIST, and phsyically less L2 cache (the E6300 and E6400 seem to have 4 megs l2 with have the l2 disabled). It may not be appropriate to make assumptions about E4xxx overclocking at this point.
However, a 9x multiplier could translate into speeds as high as 4 ghz. Existing boards can already hit 444.4 mhz FSB from time to time.