• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Copying hard drive question

BCinSC

Platinum Member
Better to just use 100Mbit crossover cable or pull drive and attach to 2nd IDE in machine? About 5GB data. WinXP Home. I used to do direct connect and had noticed in Win2000 that the device manager gets really cluttered when you do, but I believe the speed difference is an order of magnitude.
 
2nd ide would be my choice and if you are doing a total copy of the HDD
(OS and such) try norton ghost it has never failed to work for me yet.
 
For 5GB of data the cable should be fine. It shouldn't take that long to do. Assuming a transfer rate of 5MB/s (Which more than takes into account the overhead associated with data transfer) it would only take 1000 seconds, which is a little under 17 minutes. If everything is set up properly, then it shouldn't even take that long.
 
Originally posted by: BCinSC
Better to just use 100Mbit crossover cable or pull drive and attach to 2nd IDE in machine? About 5GB data. WinXP Home. I used to do direct connect and had noticed in Win2000 that the device manager gets really cluttered when you do, but I believe the speed difference is an order of magnitude.

If you are trying to make an exact copy on to a larger new drive, I'd use Drive Image 7 from (formerly) PowerQuest. Another user mentioned Ghost, but I think DI7 is a little better. Symantec must think so too since they just bought PowerQuest...
 
Just need the data from old machine to new, not a full image including OS.

Network transfer (max) at 100 Mbits, while IDE/PCI goes at 100 MBytes, right? 8x faster?
 
Back
Top