positivedoppler
Golden Member
- Apr 30, 2012
- 1,144
- 236
- 116
Guys, lets wait for the facts to come out. For all we know, the woman's vagina was charging at the 3 police officer's penis.
Wow, just wow.
How about cops should do their duties (to serve and protect) and NOT raping female motorists?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/...rape_n_5870752.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
I have never seen one person who supports rapist police. Not one.
Now I'll push people's buttons and say I agree with the cop. Can anyone intelligently explain why I'd say that? No, I don't support rapist police, so that doesn't qualify as intelligent. This isn't rocket science BTW.
So you agree with the officer's opinion that female traffic offenders should be raped?
Was he of that opinion? Because, I didn't see him quoted as saying "well, they were <traffic offense>."
I am going to bet the vast majority of these were "Want to get out of this ticket? On your knees." There was a police chief in the city where my dad resides that was busted for doing this to high school girls. And, yes, he went to jail.
If the vast majority of offenses happened like that (cop abusing his authority to sexually assault women), one could easily avoid that, as suggested, by refraining from breaking the law.
That's an asinine argument. First off, any cop who is willing to abuse their authority to the degree of "blow me to get out of this ticket" is probably also willing to pull people over for completely bogus reasons in the first place; even if someone follows every law of the road, they could be pulled over by a cop who "saw them swerve" and is now soliciting a blowjob to get them out of a ticket they never should have been issued in the first place. But even beyond that inanity, it's never a rape victim's fault. Ever. Period. Saying, "well you shouldn't have done <x>" isn't a productive line of dialogue because placing ANY blame on the victim of rape, especially in the case of rape by an authority figure sworn to protect them, is morally repugnant. One should refrain from breaking the law because laws are there to ensure society continues to function effectively, not because one might get literally raped by a cop.
That's an asinine argument. First off, any cop who is willing to abuse their authority to the degree of "blow me to get out of this ticket" is probably also willing to pull people over for completely bogus reasons in the first place; even if someone follows every law of the road, they could be pulled over by a cop who "saw them swerve" and is now soliciting a blowjob to get them out of a ticket they never should have been issued in the first place. But even beyond that inanity, it's never a rape victim's fault. Ever. Period. Saying, "well you shouldn't have done <x>" isn't a productive line of dialogue because placing ANY blame on the victim of rape, especially in the case of rape by an authority figure sworn to protect them, is morally repugnant. One should refrain from breaking the law because laws are there to ensure society continues to function effectively, not because one might get literally raped by a cop.
Even sadder is all the ATers that support these cops.
But even beyond that inanity, it's never a rape victim's fault. Ever. Period. Saying, "well you shouldn't have done <x>" isn't a productive line of dialogue because placing ANY blame on the victim of rape, especially in the case of rape by an authority figure sworn to protect them, is morally repugnant.
Guys, lets wait for the facts to come out. For all we know, the woman's vagina was charging at the 3 police officer's penis.
Even sadder is all the ATers that support these cops.
I missed the posts supporting these guys, who was it?
Guys, lets wait for the facts to come out. For all we know, the woman's vagina was charging at the 3 police officer's penis.
So why do we tell children not to take candy from creepy guys with mustaches?
So why do we tell children not to take candy from creepy guys with mustaches?
I have never seen one person who supports rapist police. Not one.
Now I'll push people's buttons and say I agree with the cop. Can anyone intelligently explain why I'd say that? No, I don't support rapist police, so that doesn't qualify as intelligent. This isn't rocket science BTW.
Was he of that opinion? Because, I didn't see him quoted as saying "well, they were <traffic offense>."
I am going to bet the vast majority of these were "Want to get out of this ticket? On your knees." There was a police chief in the city where my dad resides that was busted for doing this to high school girls. And, yes, he went to jail.
If the vast majority of offenses happened like that (cop abusing his authority to sexually assault women), one could easily avoid that, as suggested, by refraining from breaking the law.