Cops sodomize guy for smoking pot

[Vic]

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

Unless they're cops...then obviously due process doesn't apply.

/sarcasm

Pretty sick, isn't it. The screaming of "my rights!", until it gets to our courts.

And the last time you cared about due process and waiting until the courts decided to cast judgment on a defendant who wasn't a cop was.... ?

 

[mugs]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: mugs

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: RU482
Gotta Love those Netflix popups

WTF is that real? What were they thinking?

It's the URL that generated the popup:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sodomize

So RU482 needed to look sodomize up in the dictionary before participating in this thread? :laugh:

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt on that, because I sometimes look up words that I'm familiar with just to see if there are alternate definitions that I'm not aware of. But he looked it up and he didn't recognize that the ad URL contained the URL of the page he was looking at.

 

[jpeyton]

Sodomize the cops with a tazer gun before firing a few thousand volts into their intestines.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sodomize the cops with a tazer gun before firing a few thousand volts into their intestines.

That would be 50,000 volts (to be precise).

 

[Newbian]

Originally posted by: mugs

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: RU482
Gotta Love those Netflix popups

WTF is that real? What were they thinking?

It's the URL that generated the popup:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sodomize

He is using firefox and doesn't have adblock and noscript?

/Fail

 

[DayLaPaul]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

Unless they're cops...then obviously due process doesn't apply.

/sarcasm

I think that applies to suspects as well, even fleeing suspects.

 

[ChaoZ]

Originally posted by: deftron
Transit cop testifies he witnessed it.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new...ks_michael_mine-3.html

Maloney's lawyer, Paul Martin, said his client at first didn't know what he had seen but came forward when he read newspaper accounts. He waived immunity to testify before the grand jury but is unlikely to be charged.

Can someone explain to me what he could possibly be charged with?

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: DayLaPaul

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

Unless they're cops...then obviously due process doesn't apply.

/sarcasm

I think that applies to suspects as well, even fleeing suspects.

Which would be why there's an investigation and rumors of a criminal trial.

You're a bright one.

 

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: ChaoZ

Originally posted by: deftron
Transit cop testifies he witnessed it.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new...ks_michael_mine-3.html

Maloney's lawyer, Paul Martin, said his client at first didn't know what he had seen but came forward when he read newspaper accounts. He waived immunity to testify before the grand jury but is unlikely to be charged.

Can someone explain to me what he could possibly be charged with?

wowzers

 

[DayLaPaul]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: DayLaPaul

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

Unless they're cops...then obviously due process doesn't apply.

/sarcasm

I think that applies to suspects as well, even fleeing suspects.

Which would be why there's an investigation and rumors of a criminal trial.

You're a bright one.

Yes, and you're overly sensitive. Sorry for striking a nerve.

 

[AstroManLuca]

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

That's all you could come up with? Man, I expected more from you, Spidey. Especially since that argument can be turned around so easily and applied to all the other police brutality threads that come up, except in those cases, you'd have to apply the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" to a suspect rather than a police officer. I don't see you defending suspects' rights, though, ever. They were always "asking for it," no matter what. They're always guilty until proven innocent in your mind.

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: AstroManLuca

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

That's all you could come up with? Man, I expected more from you, Spidey. Especially since that argument can be turned around so easily and applied to all the other police brutality threads that come up, except in those cases, you'd have to apply the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" to a suspect rather than a police officer. I don't see you defending suspects' rights, though, ever. They were always "asking for it," no matter what. They're always guilty until proven innocent in your mind.

He's run dry of apologizum juice. Four absurd police brutality threads in such short time and he is all dried up and tried and out of excuses for why police are above the law.

There are good cops. The sad fact is there are far too many bad cops. On top of that there are horrible cops like this joker Kern who apparently already cost the city 50,000 big ones for excessive force in two other cases.

Apparently there is a problem in the system that allows scum like this to wear a badge and carry a gun. Thankfully there is someone like Maloney in this case who had the guts to forget the cop-brother-love bullshit and stand up for what is right. Guts that someone like spidey apparently lacks.
I would also think that those "fiscal conservatives" would have an issue with policies that allow cops to run up 50,000 smack-a-roo's, and potentially another 220k in one year. Though, they'd probably try to blame the unions or minorities.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: AstroManLuca

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

That's all you could come up with? Man, I expected more from you, Spidey. Especially since that argument can be turned around so easily and applied to all the other police brutality threads that come up, except in those cases, you'd have to apply the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" to a suspect rather than a police officer. I don't see you defending suspects' rights, though, ever. They were always "asking for it," no matter what. They're always guilty until proven innocent in your mind.

He's run dry of apologizum juice. Four absurd police brutality threads in such short time and he is all dried up and tried and out of excuses for why police are above the law.

There are good cops. The sad fact is there are far too many bad cops. On top of that there are horrible cops like this joker Kern who apparently already cost the city 50,000 big ones for excessive force in two other cases.

Apparently there is a problem in the system that allows scum like this to wear a badge and carry a gun. Thankfully there is someone like Maloney in this case who had the guts to forget the cop-brother-love bullshit and stand up for what is right. Guts that someone like spidey apparently lacks.
I would also think that those "fiscal conservatives" would have an issue with policies that allow cops to run up 50,000 smack-a-roo's, and potentially another 220k in one year. Though, they'd probably try to blame the unions or minorities.

Or possibly a lack of sufficient numbers of good applicants?

 

[PrinceofWands]

Publicly execute everyone involved.

 

[Red Irish]

I guess I'll have to strike sparking a jay in New York City off my list of things to do.

 

[KevinH]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: spidey07
Innocent until proven guilty.

Unless they're cops...then obviously due process doesn't apply.

/sarcasm

Pretty sick, isn't it. The screaming of "my rights!", until it gets to our courts.

And the last time you cared about due process and waiting until the courts decided to cast judgment on a defendant who wasn't a cop was.... ?

I rarely post but I still read AT now and then and I have read enough to know that there is no way in hell he'll respond to you, Vic.

He stand's no chance in a debate. None.

 

[lupi]

They caught him with pot? Hmmm...maybe I can forgive the brutality charge in this case.

 

[40Hands]

Originally posted by: Red Irish
I guess I'll have to strike sparking a jay in New York City off my list of things to do.

Look guys! The system works!

 

[Vette73]

Seems Kern, the cop, has issues...


"The city paid out about $50,000 this year to settle two excessive-force lawsuits against Kern, who joined the NYPD in 2005, the Daily News reported Thursday."

And been there less then 5 years.

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: hiromizu
They need to seriously limit lawsuits for stupid shit like this. 220M? Come on now...plus he's an artist in Brooklyn, he should be used to getting porked!

Limit it? Only if it means swapping out the 220M for allowing the victim to sodomize the offending cops.

This week is definitely not boding well for the tools in blue.

 

[BabaBooey]

I was once raped with a nightstick by some cop in New Hampshire somewhere,I was quite drunk at the time riding some kids bigwheel and this cop pulls me over and rapes me in the butt with his nightstick and then let me off w/ a warning and a few slivers....

 

[Phokus]

WTF is up with NYPD and sodomizing people? They did that to that African immigrant years ago and had to pay a huge sum of money in compensation. Are they ex Abu Ghraib employees or something?

 

[zoiks]

Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Publicly execute everyone involved.

You mean including the pottie?

 

[meltdown75]

now that's what i call a buzzkill!

 

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: lupi
They caught him with pot? Hmmm...maybe I can forgive the brutality charge in this case.

Actually, according to the article, they caught him with nothing.