If he hadn't shot the dog, I assume animal control would have picked it up, waited a bit, then put the dog down themselves? Is that true?
Don't think so. The dog hadn't
actually attacked anyone, let alone bit anyone.
The owner didn't have the dog licensed, but could have rectified that at any time even after the dog was picked up.
From the article:
The officers were responding to a call from LaGrange resident Mary Coleman that the dog had acted threateningly toward her and her daughter as they walked to a school bus stop.
It was growling at my six-year-old, Coleman testified. I wanted my kid to be safe and myself to be safe.
Mays [dog's owner] pointed out that the dog could not have been too angry because Coleman chained it at her home while Howell and Powell went to get special equipment used in handling animals.
So, Mary Coleman, the complainant, was so afraid of this vicious dog but was somehow able to grab it, take it to her house, then reach down and affix a chain to it's collar?
Please.
Just watch the entire video and you will see this was not a vicious dog and what transpired was a brutal and unnecessary mistake.
The officer HAD the dog successfully on a rigid pole snare. There was NO way the dog could have hurt anyone then, even if it wanted to, which it clearly did not!
The officer then punked out and cold bloodedly shot the dog when he
clearly did not have to.
Of course, the owner has primary blame since he shouldn't have let his dog run loose, but that dog did not deserve to die.
Why do you think someone in the police department itself leaked the video
from the police cruiser to Mays?
Awful all the way 'round.