linky here, might be nsfw dating ads.
Not sure how they can even think about suing, or even blaming the cop for killing him.
-fk
Not sure how they can even think about suing, or even blaming the cop for killing him.
-fk
Originally posted by: Ramma2
I don't know, it looked like he was on top and was nearly in control. Was a shot to the head justified? Why not shoulder/arm etc.
Originally posted by: George P Burdell
somebody copy-paste the article please
Originally posted by: George P Burdell
somebody copy-paste the article please
Originally posted by: senseamp
I don't see a problem with this going to court.
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: senseamp
I don't see a problem with this going to court.
Outside of wasteing taxpayer money and the time of the members of the jury you mean?
Originally posted by: Ramma2
I don't know, it looked like he was on top and was nearly in control. Was a shot to the head justified? Why not shoulder/arm etc.
Originally posted by: bradruth
Originally posted by: Ramma2
I don't know, it looked like he was on top and was nearly in control. Was a shot to the head justified? Why not shoulder/arm etc.
YOU DON'T SHOOT TO WOUND.
Originally posted by: Frackal
I'm surprised the cop continued to wrestle with him after that first shot. I would have shot him immediately