I tend to buy individual pans. As a professional, I think sets appeal to folks who don't really cook
Iron Wok > ALL
Iron Wok > ALL
great thanks, but do you have any feedback on the type of pans that are useful?
Very good advice. I would add one caveat. For fry pans, or skillets, a semi-serious chef should have both cast iron and stainless steel skillets. Both are great for high heat uses and for cooking meats. However, if you plan on subsequently using the fond to make a sauce, cast iron lacks in that department, unless it's ceramic coated.The first concern, over and above materials, is getting a pan the right size for the amount of food you generally make. Most sets have too many small pans.
Next, heavy thick pans are almost always better for everything
Sauce pans should be SS with thick bottoms
Sautee pans should have a curved side
Stock pots should be large enough to make a usable quantity of stock or soup. I like a 5 or 6 gallon pot for home use.
Fry pans and dutch ovens should be cast iron.
As with anything, there are exceptions. Mild steel woks and crepe pans for example.
Handles should be oven safe.
Non stick is convenient but, not a necessity. Any pan can do a good job of cooking eggs, pancakes, etc.
Get pans with smooth bottoms, some anodized type pans have ridged bottoms which often cause problems.
Lids are convenient but, not a necessity. Sheet pans or foil work just as well.
So, get the right sized pan, preheat the pan and, heavy is good.
The Chef has spoken.
So, let it be written. So, let it be done.
You try making a cream based sauce in a wok or hollandaise. Come back when you do.
Wok's are only good at one thing and one thing only. Any good cook knows that different means mean different pans.
Cast iron woks work great for cream based sauces.
Very good advice. I would add one caveat. For fry pans, or skillets, a semi-serious chef should have both cast iron and stainless steel skillets. Both are great for high heat uses and for cooking meats. However, if you plan on subsequently using the fond to make a sauce, cast iron lacks in that department, unless it's ceramic coated.
Agree with everything. Right pan/pot for the job for what you need. It takes experience before you realize "hey, I need this because I've had enough times when I wanted this capability".
I disagree because creating a sauce from a cast iron pan leaches the very oils from the pan that you want to remain in the first place, nor can you release all the fond properly. Like most chefs, I tend to use alcohol to deglaze as well, which also tends to destroy the seasoning in a nicely seasoned cast iron skillet, imo.I have to disagree unless you're making a cream based sauce. There is nothing slicker than a well seasoned cast iron pan and I've never has any problems with the fond created when using them. Any pan based sauce that I need in any quantity, I tend to make in a roaster or braising pan though.
Feeling the Heat
Back to nonstick pans. Both DuPont and the EPA say that cooks have little to worry about if they use nonstick cookware properly.Theres little dispute that, above certain temperatureshotter than the smoke point of cooking oils or the point where food is burnedthe nonstick coating will break down and release toxic fumes. Any surface thats subject to extreme temperature will give off toxic gases. According to DuPont, cookware with Teflon nonstick coating has a recommended maximum use temperature of 500 degrees Fahrenheit and that significant decomposition of the coating will occur only when temperatures exceed about 660 degrees Fahrenheit, which could easily happen if nonstick pans were left dry or empty on a hot burner.
I disagree because creating a sauce from a cast iron pan leaches the very oils from the pan that you want to remain in the first place, nor can you release all the fond properly. Like most chefs, I tend to use alcohol to deglaze as well, which also tends to destroy the seasoning in a nicely seasoned cast iron skillet, imo.
This is a well known point of contention amongst chefs though so we may just have to agree to disagree on that point. It diverts well off the path of the OP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TastesLikeChicken View Post
Very good advice. I would add one caveat. For fry pans, or skillets, a semi-serious chef should have both cast iron and stainless steel skillets. Both are great for high heat uses and for cooking meats. However, if you plan on subsequently using the fond to make a sauce, cast iron lacks in that department, unless it's ceramic coated.
I have to disagree unless you're making a cream based sauce. There is nothing slicker than a well seasoned cast iron pan and I've never has any problems with the fond created when using them. Any pan based sauce that I need in any quantity, I tend to make in a roaster or braising pan though.
__________________
I have to disagree unless you're making a cream based sauce. There is nothing slicker than a well seasoned cast iron pan and I've never has any problems with the fond created when using them. Any pan based sauce that I need in any quantity, I tend to make in a roaster or braising pan though.
I have to disagree unless you're making a cream based sauce. There is nothing slicker than a well seasoned cast iron pan and I've never has any problems with the fond created when using them. Any pan based sauce that I need in any quantity, I tend to make in a roaster or braising pan though.
You will never find a chef that makes any sauces in cast iron. Cast iron is for frying and browning. Sooth surface pans are used for sauces and soups (ie- stainless steel is popular).
Personally, I think the whole thing about non-stick giving off gases is hogwash. I also think that non-stick has its place and although it's possible to cook food in cast iron and stainless with minimal sticking, it still takes some elbow grease to get it clean where as non-stick is actually non-stick. I cook all the time and I am staging at a restaurant.
I think alot of people recommend cast iron and stainless, or rather recommend against NS beacuse the former seems more "manly" and tough. Almost like being anti-technology. Non-stick has it's uses. Get a 10" and 12" NS pan from Calphalon. They are like $35 a piece. Then get a single cast iron (you don't need two) and the All-Clad stainless set.
You will be spending a lot but you'll have products that should last you a lifetime.
Oh yeah, look at Le Creuset or similar enamel cast iron. You cannot beat it for risotto's, soups, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWG98yLh0x8You will never find a chef that makes any sauces in cast iron. Cast iron is for frying and browning. Sooth surface pans are used for sauces and soups (ie- stainless steel is popular).
It is not because cast iron is not capable. it is because cast iron requires upkeep that stainless steel pans don't. In my family's restaurant, nearly all the pans used are stainless steel. They are light, they dont rust, and can be left to drip dry in the pan rack. Try that with cast iron! Plus, with commercial stoves, sometimes the heat can deform the steel in the pan. All we do then is take the pans out back and hand hammer them flat, while they are cold. Cast iron is far too brittle and will shatter. Stainless steel pans can take far more abuse than cast iron. And stainless pans heat up sooner.
Only thing you shouldn't cook with in cast iron is acidic food (e.g tomato) which will eat away at the seasoning.
Cast iron has its places and even maintains a superior patina which requires less oil to cook with once a good seasoning has been built up. Stainless steel pans do not maintain a patina/seasoning like cast iron does. When we blacken fish, fry or do a stovetop to oven, it is with cast iron. Cast iron can keep up with SS pans in nearly every category, but they suck in a fast paced restaurant kitchen environment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWG98yLh0x8
I don't use cast iron for sauces (another reason is even well-seasoned cast iron will impart a metallic taste to the sauce, ime) but there are chefs that do.
