• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Conway: No plan to pursue charges against Clinton

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
buckshot24 said:
She broke the law but Comey said she didn't do it on purpose. I'm not contradicting myself at all, I'm contradicting Comey.
Click to expand...

Without legal training or access to the evidence.

How arrogant is that? It looks the same as Bundyites waving around their pocket Constitutions from here.
 
Hillary's first inclination is to lie. That's also behavioral characteristic of alcoholism / drug addiction. It's good that Trump want's to "help her heal".
 
jman19 said:
I agree, masterful work by Trump to dupe a whole of bunch of his supporters. This is the candidate who had his crowd screaming "lock her up!" on election night before he came out to speak to her.

There is no political victory to be had by saying he wants further investigations now. As soon as his supporters get pissed at him for something else, this will get trotted out again to fuel the flames.

Politics as usual.
Click to expand...

Most of them weren't duped, they knew all along it was dishonest but chose to go along with it in the hopes that it might dupe some very low information voters.

fskimospy said:
Then what counts as the GOP? Be specific. Five? Ten? Fifty? All of them? Do they have to buy an infomercial? What?

Color me shocked that you're now denying public statements by the House Majority Leader and another sitting congressman as being indicative of the GOP position. Now apparently large swaths of the GOP has to make public statements that they know to be electorally ruinous in order for it to meet buckshot's standard.
Click to expand...

Buckshot is one of the former. He's not nearly as tardy as he lets on, not unlike trump, and he successfully baits liberals to be his co-morons every time. Just say something which doesn't really makes sense, and they will jump on the bandwagon to correct him; rinse, repeat.

Remember, in our democracy you only have to influence a small percent of real dummies who'll actually believe "both sides equally bad" to tip the scales, and "teaching the controversy" works rather well to that end.
 
IGBT said:
Hillary's first inclination is to lie. That's also behavioral characteristic of alcoholism / drug addiction. It's good that Trump want's to "help her heal".
Click to expand...

Maybe chemtrails are real. How else do you explain this level of brain damage?
 
I think chasing after Clinton could end up being a lesson in futility. It is like trying to out-lawyer a lawyer. It would be a huge distraction and waste a lot of money.
 
I have seen Hillary sestify or read about it and her favorite thing to claim is "That was a long time ago, and frankly, I cant remember."

It is like beating up a woman with Parkinson's.
 
If she's seriously threatened with prison we will find out about all the health problems and addictions she has been lying about...as she uses them to try to stay out of prison.
 
It would have been a great trial, with both immediately prior (GOP) Sec of State's called as involuntary defense witnesses to admit they did the exact same thing Hillary did, and further that Colin Powell urged her, on two separate occasions, to use her own private server because the State Department;s computer system was so abysmal.

It was a witch hunt, pure and simple, and the puritans got the government they wanted. Mission accomplished, stupid to continue to pursue it and most likely lose in court. A tremendously successful political con job ala Wille Horton and swiftboating.
 
Thump553 said:
It would have been a great trial, with both immediately prior (GOP) Sec of State's called as involuntary defense witnesses to admit they did the exact same thing Hillary did, and further that Colin Powell urged her, on two separate occasions, to use her own private server because the State Department;s computer system was so abysmal...........................
Click to expand...
That's a pretty bald-faced lie and was the subject of a Colin Powell interview.
 
Thump553 said:
It would have been a great trial, with both immediately prior (GOP) Sec of State's called as involuntary defense witnesses to admit they did the exact same thing Hillary did, and further that Colin Powell urged her, on two separate occasions, to use her own private server because the State Department;s computer system was so abysmal.

It was a witch hunt, pure and simple, and the puritans got the government they wanted. Mission accomplished, stupid to continue to pursue it and most likely lose in court. A tremendously successful political con job ala Wille Horton and swiftboating.
Click to expand...

But they'll always believe.
 
Jhhnn said:
Without legal training or access to the evidence.

How arrogant is that? It looks the same as Bundyites waving around their pocket Constitutions from here.
Click to expand...
The agreed upon facts is enough to know that she acted outside of the law.
 
fskimospy said:
Then what counts as the GOP? Be specific. Five? Ten? Fifty? All of them? Do they have to buy an infomercial? What?

Color me shocked that you're now denying public statements by the House Majority Leader and another sitting congressman as being indicative of the GOP position. Now apparently large swaths of the GOP has to make public statements that they know to be electorally ruinous in order for it to meet buckshot's standard.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one making claims that can't be substantiated. You have two guys who may or may not have been speaking for the GOP when they made comments about the Benghazi hearings.

More than 2 guys need to say something in order for it to be representative of the whole. If two sitting Democrat congresspersons agree on something is that the Democratic Party saying it? Do we really want to go there?
 
Jhhnn said:
That's obviously been true from the beginning. I's just the latest in a series of empty puffed up scandals from Birtherism forward.
Click to expand...
The Democratic party's lack of interest isn't because of partisan politics? The Democrats are bastions of objectivity apparently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top