• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

convince me to switch over to linux

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Terumo
Originally posted by: Sunner
Actually, I told him he should continue to use Windows since it obviously works for him.
I'm not surprised you don't care though, since all you wanna do is pick fights.

This is what you wrote....
Well, your first post made me firmly believe that Linux isn't for you, so don't bother.

How does a challenge qualify as being not good enough for him? Or is that he bothered to challenge that *nix pedestal?

Challenge? When did "Not for you" become a challenge?
Solaris isn't for my parents, is saying that the same thing as challenging them?

The OP is obviously happy enough with Windows and has no real interest in learning Linux(or so it seems), so why should he bother?
My parents run Windows, it works fine enough for them, and they don't much care what they run so long as it works, so why should they bother with Mac OS, Linux, or anything else?
Am I "challenging" them too?

It's ridiculously obvious you're only looking for an argument for the sake of it.
 
Since when is *nix a pedestal anyways?

It stopped being a high point in computer software science years ago, and Linux/BSD makes it as inexpensive as breathing. To get the same functionality as a "full" installation of Fedora Core would cost me a few thousand dollars if I tried to do the same thing with Windows, and to get the same functionality as I can acheive with Debian would literally take hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of closed source software.

And distros struggle to make it as easy and friendly as possible.

There are a few things that Windows does that it's very good at, and once you get used to Windows it's hard to switch to Linux for most people. There are much less commercial games for Linux, but they do exist and there is a wide selection of them.

Security is a issue with any operating system or just plain anything, but generally Linux has a better track record. And if it a very high priority you have OpenBSD, which is much superior to something like Windows n almost every security-type considuraton.

All it takes is some effort and some time. The rewards are pretty high.

And that's mearly from a practical standpoint.

From a moral and philoshophical standpoint Linux/BSD and Free/Open source software has significantly good qualities. It allows people to share and collaborate on programs and have a open proccess. It encourages open standards and compatability. It removes most of the incentive people have for pirating software. Some people may argue it's more anti-capitolist, but I don't think so. I think that utimately it's very pro-capitolist and is much better suited for a culture that identifies individual freedoms as the most important priority in business and law.

Those are more of the positive aspects of F/OSS software in general, and may or may not matter to you or anybody else.

I think the pratical positive aspects are good enough for most people, though.

But right now it takes effort to learn and adapt to a new OS. And there are lots of real-world reasons to stick to Windows still, unfortunately. If somebody doesn't care about this sort of thing, they just don't care and I can't see any positive reason to switch to Linux for that sort of person. I am not going to think any less of a person that uses Windows. After all, it's all just operating systems, information technology, and software.
 
What I don't care for in these type of debates is the "have to choose one or the other" mentality. Just because the companies choose to partake in such an "us and them" approach doesn't mean users have to. Last year I was dual-booting Windows and Gentoo, and although my current main box is Windows XP Pro only (it has to be for work purposes, plus I think it's a pretty good system and I have a lot of Windows software I like), nonetheless a few months from now (once I've finished a move) I plan to rebuild my 2nd machine (Old Venerable, see my rigs below) into one that will be running Linux 24/7 (I just haven't decided if I want to run Gentoo again or if I should jump to Debian). So I say: run the OS that the applications you want to use demand ... and if circumstances allow, run both!
 
Back
Top