To me it's a little unbelievable that this thread has gone this far. The administration of a religion by human beings has almost never had much to do with the theological beliefs of the religion. The larger the religion, the more true this is. When Islam started to spread, it was a very tolerant but militant religion. It had respect for "people of the book" (Jews and Christians) and, as a general rule, there were no forced conversions. The Muslims were so dedicated to principles then that they had to recruit foreign armies to attack each other.
That was then. This is now. Show me the western religion without blood on its hands.
That was then. This is now. Show me the western religion without blood on its hands.