• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Constructive Criticism for My Website

2 things:

1) you need a comments section for each article. i need to let you know how bad your advice is

2) smartmoneyhelp? smart money doesnt need help. dumbmoneyhelp is.more suitable


your welcome
 
2 things:

1) you need a comments section for each article. i need to let you know how bad your advice is

2) smartmoneyhelp? smart money doesnt need help. dumbmoneyhelp is.more suitable


your welcome

thanks for the input.

there is a comments section so have at it 🙂
 
thanks for the input.

there is a comments section so have at it 🙂


well i'll be........helps to check the site before commenting. i can send you great financial advice that you can post. good site though, congrats
 
Looks like a standard blog page. Nice and clean. No complaints...other than it needs a MIDI file playing in the background when you visit.

Maybe a FLAMING LOGO too!

coollogo_com-220532277.gif
 
Looks very Web 2.0 but that's ok I guess. You didn't screw anything up along those lines, I just personally find 2.0 style to be very forgettable. But it does look fine, colors work, etc.

With the current relatively short post, I see 2 ads above the fold. I would prefer to see only one, and a second if I have to scroll down.
 
I prefer sites that you don't have to scroll as much. They have the headline and then the first paragraph or two of the article with a click to expand or go the entire article. This makes it easier to scan the articles and read the items that are the most interesting.
 
I'd say it doesn't look credible. Especially with that name. What is your target audience? What is your product? I'd say look into developing those a lot more, then focus on making the website look more personable.
 
Looks very Web 2.0 but that's ok I guess. You didn't screw anything up along those lines, I just personally find 2.0 style to be very forgettable. But it does look fine, colors work, etc.

With the current relatively short post, I see 2 ads above the fold. I would prefer to see only one, and a second if I have to scroll down.
this
I prefer sites that you don't have to scroll as much. They have the headline and then the first paragraph or two of the article with a click to expand or go the entire article. This makes it easier to scan the articles and read the items that are the most interesting.
and this
 
The second word of the first post is a type-o, so yeah you have no credibility already.

edit:
LOL then this gem:
"Some businesses lower their prices (or conversely higher their prices) if the website viewer is coming from a business."

Guy, really, if you such a weak grasp of the English language, perhaps blogging isn't for you.
 
The second word of the first post is a type-o, so yeah you have no credibility already.

edit:
LOL then this gem:
"Some businesses lower their prices (or conversely higher their prices) if the website viewer is coming from a business."

Guy, really, if you such a weak grasp of the English language, perhaps blogging isn't for you.

What? Some businesses to more higher their prices, but after they see the compostition, they more lower their prices. Simple business practse.
 
Unfortunately I don't have anything constructive to add, but I just wanted to say nice work! I enjoyed reading some of your posts and I will be saving this link to read more when I have time.
 
Do you have permission to use the photos in your articles? Royalty free stock photos? Did you get permission to use ebay, craigslist, norton and mint logos?

Something else to think about.
 
Back
Top