Rant Conspiracy theories/ Random thoughts -- Post your whackiest beliefs in here that no one agrees with WITHOUT REGRETS!

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
I'm not sure Bibi really cares that much about Israeli people if it means he gets to stay in power longer.


This was my take. Besides keeping his position, it'd entitle him (in his own mind) to level and bulldoze Gaza in order to expand Israel. He'd already been doing it bit by bit, neighborhood by neighborhood...he just got impatient and said bomb it all and drive them out or kill them.
Yup, he wants Lebensraum for Israel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,807
33,807
136
Not sure why people think they need 120/240 FPS when 60 is more than enough.
Given the very low bit rate of the optic nerve, 120/240 is audiophile-esque snake oil. The original IBM CGA graphics card from 1981 had almost twice the data throughput of the human optic nerve.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,865
10,220
136
0 - 24 get an education (get charged up)
24 - 64 work 3 jobs trying to chase a dream of getting ahead (discharge)
64 - 74 retire, travel if you can (squeeze out the last bit)
74 - end up in a nursing home or with a home health aide (recycle)
something like this,

Birth, School, Work, Death:

 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,364
16,634
146
Given the very low bit rate of the optic nerve, 120/240 is audiophile-esque snake oil. The original IBM CGA graphics card from 1981 had almost twice the data throughput of the human optic nerve.
Idk about 240, but I can easily tell the difference between 60 and 120+ at 40yo.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,214
3,127
146
Just a point of clarification, that means you're on board with "we didn't actually land on the moon"?
I never said I necessary believed in these, just said they were my favorites.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,264
136
I'm not sure Bibi really cares that much about Israeli people if it means he gets to stay in power longer.


This was my take. Besides keeping his position, it'd entitle him (in his own mind) to level and bulldoze Gaza in order to expand Israel. He'd already been doing it bit by bit, neighborhood by neighborhood...he just got impatient and said bomb it all and drive them out or kill them.
He's barely in charge because he has to cater to the extreme right wing to stay in power. He and Trump are like 2 peas in a pod.
Biden better wake up soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,865
10,220
136
I never said I necessary believed in these, just said they were my favorites.
I have never spent 20 seconds diving into any of the moon landing deniers' claims. What do you find interesting about that?
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,865
10,220
136
Flight 93 was shot down. The "Let's roll" story was made up from whole cloth. Cell phones in 2001 didn't work well enough to allow continuous calls from a moving aircraft. Cell tower antennas are designed to cover horizontal ground, not the sky above.
If those calls didn't happen I'd think that would have come out. The dead's surviving families, etc. would have denied they talked to those on the plane. Calls WERE recorded. Do you have any corroborating information?

Cockpit recordings indicate the passengers on United Airlines Flight 93 teamed up to attack their hijackers, forcing down the plane near Shanksville, a township in southwestern Pennsylvania. But conspiracy theorists assert that Flight 93 was destroyed by a heat-seeking missile from an F-16 or a mysterious white plane.


Here's a thread that was started at reddit:


The USA shot down United 93​


"I don’t believe in too many conspiracy theories, but I believe this one with all my heart. By the time United 93 was hijacked, we already knew an attack was well underway. The story that the passengers overcame the hijackers was just a feel good cover story over the fact we had to shoot the plane down.

Edit: Well, you guys probably talked me out of this belief. I admit, I was under the assumption that the US military had more control of our airspace than they actually do. I’m frankly shocked that we don’t have planes loaded and ready to go at a moment’s notice. Compliancy is the worse enemy."

One of the remarks:
Aircraft shot down do not plow into the ground inverted and nearly nose down (as most witnesses reported} at over 535 MPH. An attack or fighter aircraft would have shot out the engines, preventing it from crashing that fast and literally disintegrating as it did. The hijackers would not have had the engine power for such an event. IIRC, the FDRs showed the throttles were fully forward.

Your belief is simply not true.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi
Dec 10, 2005
28,615
13,710
136
If those calls didn't happen I'd think that would have come out. The dead's surviving families, etc. would have denied they talked to those on the plane. Do you have any corroborating information?

Cockpit recordings indicate the passengers on United Airlines Flight 93 teamed up to attack their hijackers, forcing down the plane near Shanksville, a township in southwestern Pennsylvania. But conspiracy theorists assert that Flight 93 was destroyed by a heat-seeking missile from an F-16 or a mysterious white plane.

If I recall, most of the calls were actually made with airphones, not cell phones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brycejones and Muse

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
I've looked closely at the evidence for a lot of conspiracy theories. Not as much today, but between 2000-2010 roughly I spent loads of time considering various theories. All came up lacking. One of the basic problems with any conspiracy theory, let alone the grand conspiracy theories many people attest to, is that it never really would make sense from a risk-benefit standpoint to undertake the conspiracy. It's not that people are incapable of engaging in grand deception (Trump!) or doing terribly violent things (9/11), it's that there's too much risk of being caught, particularly given that the larger the conspiracy, the more people must be involved and must keep quiet about it forever.

I mean, does anyone really think that Bush would plan 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq? All they had to do was lie about WMD's. They didn't need 9/11. But even if they did, any supposed benefit of such an invasion could never have been worth the risk.

Once an alleged conspiracy must necessarily involve people outside a small, core group of conspirators, like journalists, police or bystander eyewitnesses, the theory becomes markedly less plausible. That in fact is why these are extraordinary claims which require more than ordinary proof. Yet I've never seen one which offered even that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69 and Paratus

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,364
16,634
146
I mean, does anyone really think that Bush would plan 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq? All they had to do was lie about WMD's. They didn't need 9/11. But even if they did, any supposed benefit of such an invasion could never have been worth the risk.
To add to this, historically terrorist false flag attacks serve the purpose of consolidating power, not projecting power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69 and Pohemi

herm0016

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2005
8,516
1,128
126
i believe that no single corner of our government is well organized, smart, or disciplined enough to cover up anything significant. a disappointing and concerning conspiracy theory that our government really is as dumb as it looks.
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,818
10,208
136
Taylor Swift is a Pentagon asset ....


As revealed by this leaked weapons training video:


Hey Jesse Watters is just asking questions ...

The context here is that with Swift coming from pseudo-country roots and her keeping quiet about politics until 2018, the Trumpnutters had a fantasy that maybe she was their secret MAGA princess. Their hopes were dashed when it turned out she’s a decent human being who doesn’t approve of misogyny and LGBT rights being trampled. Hell hath no fury like a mediocre white man scorned by a successful woman.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: dank69 and Pohemi

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,364
16,634
146
i believe that no single corner of our government is well organized, smart, or disciplined enough to cover up anything significant. a disappointing and concerning conspiracy theory that our government really is as dumb as it looks.
Now this is something we'll disagree on. I know that there are many, many deep, dark corners of the government that are exceedingly well organized and actively cover up a great many things. They aren't things that virtually anyone ever knows about though. These are things that individuals numbering in the dozens at most are aware of.

Many of the non-insane conspiracy theories (at home and abroad) are covers for these events, and nobody will ever know more than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAPUNISHER

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136
I disagree with the idea that there's some clear distinction between the 'legitimate power' of experts and technocrats and 'illegitimate power' of despots and aristocrats. Both forms of power are equally prone to be abused. You can never fully trust the professional managerial class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,807
33,807
136
i believe that no single corner of our government is well organized, smart, or disciplined enough to cover up anything significant. a disappointing and concerning conspiracy theory that our government really is as dumb as it looks.
Don't knock it. As one sage put it so eloquently, "Bureaucratic incompetence is the last bastion of freedom."
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136
I have never spent 20 seconds diving into any of the moon landing deniers' claims. What do you find interesting about that?

I don't doubt the reality of the moon landings. But I remain suspicious about England's world cup victory three years earlier. I strongly suspect that famous footage was faked. It certainly seems far less plausible than people walking on the moon. I've seen England play.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,955
11,104
136
Might not be a bad prediction that the US judicial system will let Trump off. He then wins the election plunging the US and the world into absolute chaos.

His bedrock of Evangelical scum support will want more steps back in time legislation.