• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rant Conspiracy theories/ Random thoughts -- Post your whackiest beliefs in here that no one agrees with WITHOUT REGRETS!

Page 100 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Of course it's a conspiracy. MAGAs want their horny men to watch that ad and get to work right away making more blue eyed white babies!

When I was in school.. we had a kid in school who was biracial. He was dark like a South Indian but he had blue eyes.

Everyone including teachers were in disbelief at first like why are you using contacts but nope it was real. People looked at him really weird though.
 
Blue eyes is a recessive gene but
Some say it could even be re-incarnation. If your eye color doesn't match your ethnicity's typical eye color, you could be re-incarnated.
Or recessive gene.
 
Some say is code for morons spouting off stupid ass theories grounded in absolute nonsense.
I have one more.

God made trump.
God allowed him to get this far.
Why?
To test the rest of us.
Do we accept the shit that trump is pulling or do we wake up and bring order back and end his chaotic reign?

This is how nazi Germany happened.
 
Women are tools of Satan, but Trump is proof god exists... mm'kay.

Well only the naive would think god is always good with so much evil in this world.

And God has always been exploited by evil.

If you do something bad I see, you're going to jail.
If you do something bad I don't see, you're going to hell.
If you do something like not follow Allah, you're a kafir and deserve to be beheaded!
If you spread blasphemy, you're going to be burned alive!

would post pics but don't wanna be on vacation.. more than enough to go around though!
 
Ok here’s a new one. Hear me out…

I think the Trump Administration plans to manufacture nuclear weapons on the Moon.

Yes, call me crazy, point and laugh, haha. But I really think this is the culmination of what Trump envisions for US Space Force and that he will direct NASA to put every effort into completing this mission.

And it may not be as far-fetched as you think: https://www.npr.org/2025/08/08/nx-s1-5493500/nasa-nuclear-reactor-on-the-moon-explainer
NASA plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030 : NPR

Here’s what we know. Our current nuclear warhead stockpile includes just under 4000 warheads. Compare that to about 22,000 at the fall of the Soviet Union. But most of those remaining warheads are at or beyond their original design life (need new tritium bottles). We’re down to one active site producing fuel for tritium replenishment. We’re limited in bringing new boost fuel sites and new weapons online because of treaties, nuclear NIMBYism, etc.

So I think our current Administration sees manufacturing on the moon as a way around non-proliferation treaties, environmental regulations, and a good solution to long term storage of both weapons and waste. Plus, they now have the tools to defund other NASA programs and allocate 100% of their budget to supporting this goal. Combine this with advances in unmanned launches and AI over the next 10-15 years, and you could have a hypersonic ICBM weapons platform in orbit around the Earth, being supplied by weapons built by robots on the moon.

Hey, it could happen!
 
I tend to think some other nations would notice that and would probably have some things to say on the matter before we reached any functional point...
 
I tend to think some other nations would notice that and would probably have some things to say on the matter before we reached any functional point...
Other nations getting uncomfortable.

China announces plan to build their own nuclear storage depot on the far side of the moon.

trumps orders moon to be blown up.

There. Threat neutralized.
 
Last edited:
Ok here’s a new one. Hear me out…

I think the Trump Administration plans to manufacture nuclear weapons on the Moon.

Yes, call me crazy, point and laugh, haha. But I really think this is the culmination of what Trump envisions for US Space Force and that he will direct NASA to put every effort into completing this mission.

And it may not be as far-fetched as you think: https://www.npr.org/2025/08/08/nx-s1-5493500/nasa-nuclear-reactor-on-the-moon-explainer
NASA plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030 : NPR

Here’s what we know. Our current nuclear warhead stockpile includes just under 4000 warheads. Compare that to about 22,000 at the fall of the Soviet Union. But most of those remaining warheads are at or beyond their original design life (need new tritium bottles). We’re down to one active site producing fuel for tritium replenishment. We’re limited in bringing new boost fuel sites and new weapons online because of treaties, nuclear NIMBYism, etc.

So I think our current Administration sees manufacturing on the moon as a way around non-proliferation treaties, environmental regulations, and a good solution to long term storage of both weapons and waste. Plus, they now have the tools to defund other NASA programs and allocate 100% of their budget to supporting this goal. Combine this with advances in unmanned launches and AI over the next 10-15 years, and you could have a hypersonic ICBM weapons platform in orbit around the Earth, being supplied by weapons built by robots on the moon.

Hey, it could happen!
No
 
I start to wonder if their isn't a fundamental problem with 'science' when applied to humans - by its nature it ignores all minorities, as anything rare is declared an 'anecdote', and in order to constitute 'data' something has to affect a significant number of people (ideally a significant number of a socially-dominant group).

When people use that "anecdotes are not data" formulation, they are usually justifying the erasure of any minority experience.
 
When people use that "anecdotes are not data" formulation, they are usually justifying the erasure of any minority experience.
Just look at what they are taught at school informally:


Makes you wonder how many other ailments they treat as "something wrong in the patient's head". It actually tells us how arrogant and proud they feel about accumulating their limited medical knowledge during their studies and think that if they can't pinpoint a cause, it can't be their lack of skill or knowledge or ability to diagnose properly. It must be some anomaly in the patient's mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pmv
^^^

I didn't watch the video, but I agree with your comment (I don't agree with _everything_ you say, but on this we are on the same page, it seems).

The prevailing belief in medicine seems to be that 'rare' is synonymous with 'non-existent'. Hence if you have anything rare you are just screwed. Nobody in the medical profession will make the slightest effort with regard to anything that isn't already in their textbooks (because doctors are generally a very lazy group of people with no intellectual curiosity).

Not least because the mental health industry provides them with that God-of-the-gaps explanation for everything ("it's all due to the mystical power of" [spooky voice] "the mind" [/spooky voice]).

No wonder medical science advances so slowly. Psychologists smuggled mysticism back in.
 
Back
Top