• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Conservatives rip Newsweek's 'crazy-eyes' Michele Bachmann cover

NFS4

No Lifer
I first saw this on NBC Nightly News this evening, and Brian Williams said that one of the quotes was that "She looks like someone is dangling a treat in front of her face"

I nearly choked on my food from laughter 😛

bachmannnewsweekcover-thumb-525x710.jpg


Sting was the King of Pain. Is it fair to call Michele Bachmann the "Queen of Rage?" That's what Newsweek has gone ahead and done on the cover of its most recent issue, a cover that has Bachmann's conservative supporters, well, uh, raging.

It's the same old song for Newsweek, which in the past has taken heat for a pair of covers with Sarah Palin, one that featured an extreme close-up and the other picturing her in a jogging outfit. In this week's issue, not only is the GOP presidential candidate (and the field's only female, so far) branded an intemperate queen, it also features a shot of Bachmann looking rather wild-eyed. As in crazy. As in "crazy woman."

Tea-party activist Dana Loesch, writing at Andrew Breitbart's "Big Journalism" site, denounced the cover as chauvinistic. Conservative pundit Michelle Malkin, addressing Newsweek editor Tina Brown, said, "You've resorted to recycling bottom-of-the-barrel moonbat photo cliches about conservative female public figures and their enraged 'crazy eyes?' Really?"

But even the National Organization for Women chimed in:

"It's sexist," NOW president Terry O'Neill told conservative news site the Daily Caller. "Casting her in that expression and then adding 'The Queen of Rage,' I think [it is]. Gloria Steinem has a very simple test: If this were done to a man or would it ever be done to a man – has it ever been done to a man? Surely this has never been done to a man."

(Someone who comes to mind as a past candidate for similar treatment: Democrat Howard Dean, who appeared on Newsweek's Jan. 12, 2004, cover. The headline was the gender-neutral -- and exceedingly dull -- "Doubts About Dean"; although, in all fairness, the cover also promoted a story on "mad cow" disease.)

Newsweek apparently stands by "Queen of Rage" for Bachmann. It promoted the story Monday on Twitter, using that as a hashtag.

As for Bachmann, she didn't rise to the bait, reports Slate's Dave Weigel. At an event in Iowa, the Minnesota congresswoman said she hadn't even seen the cover or the article.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/la-bachmann-newsweek-m,0,7104860.story
 
The right has a reason to be upset with Newsweek and how they portray Republicans:
img-nwk-cover-110613-issue_195939165348.jpg

newsweek-cover-palin.jpg

sarah-palin-newsweek-cover.jpg

sarah-palin-newsweek-cover.jpg

sarah-palin-newsweek.jpg


Compare that to the Obama covers
barak_newsweek.jpg

obama-newsweek-cover.jpg
 
The Romney one is awful.

Imagine if they took Obama and photoshopped him on the head of a rapper:
The Black Moment...

The left would have freaked. But making fun of Mormans and Republicans is par for the course.
 
PSA to conservative women posing for magazine covers: look at the camera lens. No, directly at it. Not slightly off in one direction. It isn't that hard, but it is a skill that Michele Bachmann has obviously yet to master.

And yes, she is nuts, but that has nothing to do with her appearance on the cover of Newsweek.
 
The victim culture at work.

It's the 'big lie' technique. If the media covers each party similarly, and you point out only the Republican negative coverage, it's called 'selection bias' and make it seem bigger.

When you're LOOKING for anti-Republican bias in the media, you notice every bit of it, and not so much any other bias.

Of course the agenda is to undermine media that's accurate and contradicts their lies.
 
Back
Top