- Nov 20, 1999
- 22,994
- 779
- 126
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-the-msm-and-failed-the-rank-and-file/264855/
Great article, and i also want to point out the first comment:
I've always said people like Ann Coulter probably doesn't believe in half the stuff she spews, but there's so much profit in it (in no large part to the ingorance of your average republican voter) that it makes sense to spew it.
Relevant Boondocks clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1seThIG34R8
There's no real liberal equivalent of these rightwing pundits because a liberal version of that is a huge turnoff to liberals. This is why we like NPR or fact/math driven "pundits" like Nate Silver whereas the bombastic drivel of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Sean hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, et al rule the day, each one trying to one-up one another as to who can say the most outrageous thing to stir up anger amongst conservatives, truth and logic be damned.
I've said this a million times, but Stephen Colbert's famous quote of reality having a 'liberal bias' is probably the most prescient thing anyone has said in the 21st century. Conservatives have created their own reality distortion field.
Great article, and i also want to point out the first comment:
Well said!
But WHY are conservatives so misinformed? Because vast profits are made by misinforming them. Fox, Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Weiner-Savage, Coulter, etc. make a huge amount of money catering to a crowd that wants a daily dose of outrage. It's business, pure and simple. The conservative media makes money by manufacturing anger and indignation. To do that in a complex world, they have to omit many facts, ignore other perspectives and often just invent things. The interests of the voters (and audience) are almost irrelevant. People seem to get addicted to the ego-rush that comes from feeling superior to "those damn unpatriotic liberals", and they get addicted to being angry and over-stimulated. This is a crowd that wants certainty, wants to feel important and affirmed, and likes to imagine it is powerful and dominant and has "inside knowledge". And that's what right-wing media delivers, no matter the actual reality. Because the profits are huge.
But it's all fantasy. A cartoon.
David Frum was right when he said that the conservative movement is now led by Fox and Limbaugh. Trouble is, they've led their audience off the cliff.
I've always said people like Ann Coulter probably doesn't believe in half the stuff she spews, but there's so much profit in it (in no large part to the ingorance of your average republican voter) that it makes sense to spew it.
Relevant Boondocks clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1seThIG34R8
There's no real liberal equivalent of these rightwing pundits because a liberal version of that is a huge turnoff to liberals. This is why we like NPR or fact/math driven "pundits" like Nate Silver whereas the bombastic drivel of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Sean hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, et al rule the day, each one trying to one-up one another as to who can say the most outrageous thing to stir up anger amongst conservatives, truth and logic be damned.
I've said this a million times, but Stephen Colbert's famous quote of reality having a 'liberal bias' is probably the most prescient thing anyone has said in the 21st century. Conservatives have created their own reality distortion field.