Conservative paper dumps O'Reilly

[jaeger66]

Originally posted by: BeeVo
And where do you get both sides of the issues from? What source?

That would depend entirely on the issue in question. If it was a political debate, I'd want to hear from the candiates themselves rather than some hack whose only job is to be loud and obnoxious enough to manufacture attention.

 

[AndrewR]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: AndrewR

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: SagaLore

Fox News commentator Bill O?Reilly and the editorial crew over at The Orange County Register often delight their conservative audiences with savage attacks on Democrats while rationalizing or ignoring Republican Party shenanigans. Take, for example, California?s recent power crisis. O?Reilly and the Register angrily blamed Democrats and environmentalists for the state?s pathetic electric-regulatory system. Never mind the system was designed by Republican power-company lobbyists in league with Republican manufacturing executives and approved in 1996 when Pete Wilson, a Republican, was governor; when Curt Pringle, a Republican, was speaker of the Assembly; and when Republicans controlled the California Public Utilities Commission.

Liberal propoganda.

Can you disprove that or are you just spouting the usual Neo Conservative Limbaughtista Propaganda yourself?

Did you actually read the article? It is so decisively liberal that it's blindingly apparent. I would bet that the information quoted in there regarding the electricity regulatory system, if it's even true, is only a quarter of the story at best. That article amounts to little more than hate journalism because the author obviously has an intense dislike for O'Reilly.

But, it's not Fox News so it's unbiased, right?

You don't even know if it's true or not and you are already saying that if it's true it's a best only a quarter of the story. Obviously you haven't a clue about it. There is plenty of blame to go around but it definately wasn't just a Democrat Caused Problem..not by far.

You don't even know if the original article's assertions are true, yet you accept them as such and label similarly unsupported contrary evidence as "Neo Conservative Limbaughtista Propaganda". It's patently obvious that the author of the original article has a serious grudge against O'Reilly. Certainly my "quarter of the story" comment was a wild guess and was only illustrative, not definitive. Given the author's bias, however, would it surprise you to find out that he left out a portion of the truth?