• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Conservative Group Rants About Same-Sex Kiss At Macy’s Parade

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Conservaterrorist logic:

Two girls kissing on TV: offensive.

Trump bragging about sexually assaulting girls and grabbing them by the pussy: Totally Ok & MAGA!

P.S. Can we elect a gay/ lesbian potus and have them give them a Fox Exclusive kissing everyday? 😉
 
Last edited:
whm1974 said:
I'm sorry I do not want to see two guys kissing that is just gross.
Click to expand...

And if someone is forcefeeding you this visual stimuli ill agree that that is a problem! - but if not, it is your right as a free person in the free world to look the other way. There, done 🙂.
 
To be clear i could care less about what two or more adults do as long as it is consensual and no no one is hurt.
 
Viper1j said:
I like lesbians.

And I have the videos to prove it! 😛
Click to expand...

Yup... if this conservative group wishes to become even more outraged then I would be more than happy to direct them to a web site full of hard core manly-man conservatives where they have a thread dedicated to pictures of women engaging in a meatless sexual diet. The also have lots of other threads dedicated to just about every part of a woman's anatomy.

They even have a thread about men who have almost completely transitioned to women... except for one thing. Yes, THAT thing.
 
whm1974 said:
To be clear i could care less about what two or more adults do as long as it is consensual and no no one is hurt.
Click to expand...
I'll take it one step further and say what one person does with his toaster in the privacy of his home is none of our business either. Heck, if he wants to marry it I say more power to him.
 
Indus said:
Conservaterrorist logic:

Two girls kissing on TV: offensive.

Trump bragging about sexually assaulting girls and grabbing them by the pussy: Totally Ok & MAGA!

P.S. Can we elect a gay/ lesbian potus and have them give them a Fox Exclusive kissing everyday? 😉
Click to expand...

Oh, if the US elected an LGBT President, that would be priceless. Mind you, it'd also likely mean that the religious right's stranglehold on American politics had already been broken, so by that point the President kissing someone of the same sex could be a non-event!

In the current climate? Oh, you'd have to be careful. Fox News hosts can't see prominent people who aren't straight, white and Christian without breaking into hives.
 
Commodus said:
Oh, if the US elected an LGBT President, that would be priceless. Mind you, it'd also likely mean that the religious right's stranglehold on American politics had already been broken, so by that point the President kissing someone of the same sex could be a non-event!

In the current climate? Oh, you'd have to be careful. Fox News hosts can't see prominent people who aren't straight, white and Christian without breaking into hives.
Click to expand...
Aren't there leaders in other countries that are openly LGBT including a few Heads of State?
 
whm1974 said:
Aren't there leaders in other countries that are openly LGBT including a few Heads of State?
Click to expand...

There are. The Prime Ministers of Ireland, Luxembourg and Serbia are all LGBT; past leaders of Belgium and Iceland have also been LGBT. You'll also see considerably more regional leaders, of course.
 
woolfe9998 said:
The implied premise of the argument that children would "lose their innocence" by seeing a same sex kiss - but not an opposite sex kiss - is that something is inherently dirty and perverted about a same sex kiss.

The right uses just the thinnest and flimsiest veneers to cover their bigotry yet we have people around here who swear up and down that there is no bigotry on the right and that liberals are the real bigots.
Click to expand...

The general objection to homosexuality is that it is perverted, which is to say an alteration or corruption of something from its original purpose.

Human sexuality's primary purpose is reproduction, just as the primary purpose of eating is nourishment. Both have pleasure as secondary purposes, and to put the secondary before the primary is, by definition, a perversion.

Therefore to simply state your opponent's argument then declare it bigotry doesnt really amount to anything other than insulting in lieu of refutal.
 
If it ain't a prolonged (two second time limit by my personal morality clock) public display of foreplay (my perspective of it not withstanding) then kiss away I say, just keep those hands from breaking some kind of lewd law to keep out of trouble.
 
Atreus21 said:
The general objection to homosexuality is that it is perverted, which is to say an alteration or corruption of something from its original purpose.

Human sexuality's primary purpose is reproduction, just as the primary purpose of eating is nourishment. Both have pleasure as secondary purposes, and to put the secondary before the primary is, by definition, a perversion.

Therefore to simply state your opponent's argument then declare it bigotry doesnt really amount to anything other than insulting in lieu of refutal.
Click to expand...
It is only perversion if it is non-consensual and someone is hurt.
 
It was a slow day for self righteous outrage. The Fundie fringe can't live w/o it, so they'll always find something. It'll be gay frogs tomorrow.
 
GodisanAtheist said:
This is like entry level conservative offendedness. I'm amazed this even registered on anyone's radar.
Click to expand...


Social media - specifically twitter. Everybody is watching what eveybody says on Twitter including the media. When somebody on the right says something the left doesn’t like then HuffPo publishes an “article” with a wall of tweets from people who don't like what someone said on Twitter. Eveybody gets offended then it gets posted in ATPN.
 
Jhhnn said:
It was a slow day for self righteous outrage. The Fundie fringe can't live w/o it, so they'll always find something. It'll be gay frogs tomorrow.
Click to expand...


Someone should tell them the eacargot they enjoy so much switch sex at will :awe:
 
Atreus21 said:
The general objection to homosexuality is that it is perverted, which is to say an alteration or corruption of something from its original purpose.

Human sexuality's primary purpose is reproduction, just as the primary purpose of eating is nourishment. Both have pleasure as secondary purposes, and to put the secondary before the primary is, by definition, a perversion.

Therefore to simply state your opponent's argument then declare it bigotry doesnt really amount to anything other than insulting in lieu of refutal.
Click to expand...

Is this what you believe?

Simply put the sexual relations between consenting adults is none of your business.
 
Last edited:
Atreus21 said:
The general objection to homosexuality is that it is perverted, which is to say an alteration or corruption of something from its original purpose.

Human sexuality's primary purpose is reproduction, just as the primary purpose of eating is nourishment. Both have pleasure as secondary purposes, and to put the secondary before the primary is, by definition, a perversion.

Therefore to simply state your opponent's argument then declare it bigotry doesnt really amount to anything other than insulting in lieu of refutal.
Click to expand...
"By definition" lol nice try.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top