Consensus on best mini-itx Z170 board?

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
I'm away from my desktop and don't really feel like sifting through tons of articles on a phone. Is there any good reason to pay the additional ~$90 dollars for the ASUS ROG over say the ASRock Fatality? I remember liking those two boards when briefly looking over them previously, I'll be trying to squeeze a pretty good overclock out of a 6700K. Is there a better board than those two? Mini-ITX only in case you skimmed the title.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,571
10,207
126
I'll be trying to squeeze a pretty good overclock out of a 6700K. Is there a better board than those two? Mini-ITX only in case you skimmed the title.

I don't know that I would be aiming for anything other than a mild overclock on an ITX board. They just aren't built for hardcore overclocking, due to physical space limitations, unlike an ATX board.
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
You would be surprised..... My ASRock FM2+ mini-itx board was good enough to take my 7850K all the way to 4.7GHz. I think both boards I listed above have pretty beefed up VRMs.
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Well that would be my first instinct, as well as when in doubt usually more expensive = better, but we know that's not always the case. Plus my current ASRock mini-itx board had been absolutely top notch.
 

lukart

Member
Oct 27, 2014
172
8
46
Well I always think Asrock as top 1 for overclock.
They got almost perfect 10, (9,9 out of 10) in TPU review of their OC Formula Z170M.

Asus is great, but you pay for it.
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Well, with a little more digging I've found both EK and Bitspower have full board monoblocks available for the ROG Impact but not for the Fatality. This could be seen as a plus or minus, it's nice to have that capability but would put the real world cost of the Impact at $210 (90 for the board and 120 for the block) more than the ASRock since I already have a spare Swiftech Apogee XL sitting around. Another big difference is the ASRock has an m2 slot, the Impact doesn't.
 
Last edited:

mxnerd

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2007
6,799
1,103
126
6700K TDP is 91W, do you really want to put a light bulb in a tiny mini-itx box?
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Heat won't be an issue, it may be later if I choose to add an RX480 to the loop when they arrive. I don't know how well a 2x120 radiator will deal with an overclocked 6700k and a gpu.
 
Last edited:

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Well I went with the ASRock, but I'm not picking it up from Microcenter until Saturday. So if anyone has a good reason to sway me to the ROG or something else, speak now or forever hold your peace. Since I'm going to be evacuating the 7850K and FM2+ board from the nCase M1, I may try to find a nice, inexpensive mini-ITX "server style" case there as well to migrate the AMD equipment to and switch my WHS over to that. Should make for a decent little upgrade from the Q8400.
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Picked up my gear from Microcenter, along with with a Samsung 950 Pro m.2 NVMe drive. I came a hair from just replacing my 3930K system too with another 6700K and the white pcb version of the Z170 Sabertooth. I do like Microcenter CPU/Mobo combo deals.
 

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,945
129
106
Well.....that was uh, easy. 4.6GHz without touching a thing except the multiplier. Then proceeded to 4.8GHz setting only vcore up to 1.35v. Just running the Corsair H100i I had on the 7850K at the moment, I need to order some parts for the actual loop it will be running. I didn't bother to install a GPU yet, going to replace the GTX760 I was running in the case with an RX480 probably in a few days. Using the 2666 sticks I previously used on my 5960X, I may end up ordering some hyper-fast 3600-4000 kit since Skylake seems to crave them.