Brigandier
Diamond Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 4,394
- 2
- 81
I don't...but, then again, I'm skilled enough so that I don't have to.
There are, however, plenty of unskilled Americans and legal immigrants who would probably be happy to.
Probably is not good enough. When you find enough rednecks to take those jobs, then we'll talk.
So they do care that it's X cents cheaper, and don't care if it's picked by illegals. So producers are hiring illegals to pick it X cents cheaper. They are giving consumers what they want and don't care about what consumers don't care about. Again, money talks, BS walks.
You handle it like this:
Your public assitance benefits will be sent to your field supervisor to be picked up each week.
And if the produce went up a few cents, no one would care. They wouldn't even notice. Do you notice if the head of lettuce went from 89c to 97c? No.
For the relatively few who did/do notice: Tough. Them noticing and having a problem with it is dwarfed by the benefits of solving illegal immigration.
To actually make the argument we should allow illegal immigration to continue so as to have cheaper produce (measured in cents no less) is akin to saying we should have allowed slavery to continue to we'd have cheaper cotton.
As you seriously F'ing saying you're for that? Really?????
Chuck
Do you want to work in the fields?
Nope, but I don't want to work in the ER as a trauma surgeon neither so should we bring an illegals to perform that?
And if the produce went up a few cents, no one would care. They wouldn't even notice. Do you notice if the head of lettuce went from 89c to 97c? No.
For the relatively few who did/do notice: Tough. Them noticing and having a problem with it is dwarfed by the benefits of solving illegal immigration.
To actually make the argument we should allow illegal immigration to continue so as to have cheaper produce (measured in cents no less) is akin to saying we should have allowed slavery to continue to we'd have cheaper cotton.
As you seriously F'ing saying you're for that? Really?????
Chuck
It's going to go up way more than that, and at that point, foreign competition from Latin America is going to eat our farmers alive. They will still have access to cheap labor, don't forget that.
BTW, your slavery rant is borderline (to put it nicely) regarded. These migrants are here of their own free will because it's economic opportunity for them. It's voluntary supply of labor meeting voluntary demand for labor. That's capitalism, that's freedom. You want to put a fence between people who want to work and people who want to hire them. That's slavery.
Yes, these people are not here on vacation, they are here to make some money, which ultimately comes from the grocery buying consumers.
Currently consumers demand their groceries as cheap as possible, not "American picked," they are speaking much louder with their wallets than they are with their ballots.
Probably is not good enough. When you find enough rednecks to take those jobs, then we'll talk.
It's going to go up way more than that, and at that point, foreign competition from Latin America is going to eat our farmers alive. They will still have access to cheap labor, don't forget that.
BTW, your slavery rant is borderline (to put it nicely) regarded. These migrants are here of their own free will because it's economic opportunity for them. It's voluntary supply of labor meeting voluntary demand for labor. That's capitalism, that's freedom. You want to put a fence between people who want to work and people who want to hire them. That's slavery.
Emo, but weak.
When most of your voters are illegal immigrants of course he's going to take this position.
Whatever. Why don't you go photochop a nice new logo for your name, maybe you whipping a brown skinned person while you eat an apple they picked, with a packed change pocket with all the pennies you saved...nice and accurate for you.
You are unreal, seriously. I wonder if you've ever done a bust ass day of work in your life....
Chuck
*yawn* really? One of my very first jobs was working along side illegals(I got paid exactly the same 10 dollars an hour under the table) digging home foundations, doing home demolition, etc. The work isn't hard and if I needed a job again I'd gladly take 10 dollars an hour cash to do it again. I've done harder worker for less.
So, you are a criminal (tax law), a tax cheat not paying for your share like the rest of society for the cost of our society, and dishonest (false taxes)? Did I read that correctly?
I have a lot of sympathy for the low-paid manual labor - why I support big progressivism in the tax code that might give you zero taxes - but not if you then have pro-rich policies.
So, you are a criminal (tax law), a tax cheat not paying for your share like the rest of society for the cost of our society, and dishonest (false taxes)? Did I read that correctly?
I have a lot of sympathy for the low-paid manual labor - why I support big progressivism in the tax code that might give you zero taxes - but not if you then have pro-rich policies.
I've paid more than my fair share of taxes...
Senseamp is correct on this point. US Produce Growers do not compete in a vacuum. They have foreign competition(one major competitor being Mexico)to deal with. So what would likely occur at the Super Market is not an increase in the Price of Produce, but a change in who Supplies the Produce.
Where he''s wrong(ish) is on who is to blame. Certainly the Consumer would put the American Produce Grower(many anyway)out of business do to their desire for Cheap Produce. So in that sense he's Right, but on the other hand the Consumer isn't being vindictive in that choice, so "Blame" is a little too strong a word. Much of this wording is from the "Buy America first" mindset, a noble endeavour(for Americans anyway), but fraught with problems as "Made in the USA" isn't as compelling as a Low Price for equal quality.
One way to avoid these issues is to Grant special Work Visas specifically designed for Agricultural Labour.