• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Congress should break out defense spending into a specific tax like FICA

her209

her209

No Lifer
This way:
- everyone with an earned income is paying for defense spending, not just the people who pay taxes
- everyone can see how much they are spending for defense
- should defense spending go up or down, the defense tax will go up or down
- lowers marginal tax rates because its not coming out of the "general" fund
 
What people would say to keep it from happening...
SLOGAN: Why do you hate good hard working American soldiers?

What really happens...
REALITY: Why do you hate contracting companies that are always late and over charge?
 
Marlin1975 said:
What people would say to keep it from happening...
SLOGAN: Why do you hate good hard working American soldiers?

What really happens...
REALITY: Why do you hate contracting companies that are always late and over charge?
Click to expand...

Same slogan was used by certain media outlets (MSNBC I'm looking in your direction) to push just about every Obama spending plan. And pretty much the same reality. There is no need to separate out defense from all government spending. Call it all a high probability for waste and inefficiency.
 
Last edited:
Infohawk said:
Why stop there? Separate out all categories of spending. And also list percentage of Americans not paying any taxes.
Click to expand...

Indeed, why single out defense?

You could do this for the social welfare, international aid programs, interest payments on federal debt, etc. Then people can have an itemized list and see exactly how much domestic / international handouts and debt really cost us.
 
A person could easily set up a website that did exactly that. Just let a person put in their federal tax amount (could be their weekly deduction, previous years amount, whatever) and then it could use data that already exists (the data used to generate that chart full of hundreds of circles) and then provide a drill down list of expenditures in much the same way that the aforementioned chart did.
 
Schadenfroh said:
Indeed, why single out defense?

You could do this for the social welfare, international aid programs, interest payments on federal debt, etc. Then people can have an itemized list and see exactly how much domestic / international handouts and debt really cost us.
Click to expand...

Can't wait for the day my paycheck stub will be 100 pages long of micro-print!!!
 
BoberFett said:
A person could easily set up a website that did exactly that. Just let a person put in their federal tax amount (could be their weekly deduction, previous years amount, whatever) and then it could use data that already exists (the data used to generate that chart full of hundreds of circles) and then provide a drill down list of expenditures in much the same way that the aforementioned chart did.
Click to expand...

individual income taxes are only 1/3 of federal budget. How do we direct loans we get? Our Gas and other excise Taxes? SS taxes? That one brings up an interesting pickle since employer pays half..which way are they going to vote.... You could easily wind up with a situation that is worse than today if at all interested in social welfare.

The US Constitution is the most perfect document in the history man - I won't go changing representative democracy, a republic, which relies on informed and active public, if not, we truly get what we deserve.
 
Last edited:
Zebo said:
individual income taxes are only 1/3 of federal budget. How do we direct loans we get? Our Gas and other excise Taxes? SS taxes? That one brings up an interesting pickle since employer pays half..which way are they going to vote.... You could easily wind up with a situation that is worse than today if at all interested in social welfare.
Click to expand...

A budget is a budget, and no matter how you play with the numbers to move money between accounts, at the end of the day you've still got money in and money out. The point isn't about exact numbers anyway, if you want to add in your employers payroll tax obligations, go for it. What it's about is understanding what you're voting for. If Joe Sixpack could see that every week he has $75 taken out of his check to pay for defense, maybe he'll think twice before pulling the lever for a Republican warmonger next time.
 
her209 said:
Same reasons why Social Security and Medicare are singled out.

😀
Click to expand...

Seems to me you're trying to get at if people knew what they were forced to pay in to defense spending, they would demand those expenditures be cut. Has that worked to reign in the spending on Social Security & Medicare?
 
As long as we add one for social programs I am all for it. Not sure why people think defense spending is a black hole though, its one area where Americans still produce a lot of the products.
 
Schadenfroh said:
Indeed, why single out defense?

You could do this for the social welfare, international aid programs, interest payments on federal debt, etc. Then people can have an itemized list and see exactly how much domestic / international handouts and debt really cost us.
Click to expand...

I agree.

Let the DOT be funded by fuel taxes.
Let the DOEnergy be funded by energy taxes.
Let the DOEedu be funded by educational based taxes.
see where this could go.
 
Defense spending is the biggest social welfare program of all time and has 50 years of fail to show for it. We can't even beat a rag tag militias who spends orders of magnitudes less. People need jobs tho and I suppose Army is just as good as building iPhones, right?
 
charrison said:
I agree.

Let the DOT be funded by fuel taxes.
Let the DOEnergy be funded by energy taxes.
Let the DOEedu be funded by educational based taxes.
see where this could go.
Click to expand...

Better solution: get rid of all of those unneeded federal organizations and stop spending tax money on them entirely!
 
BoberFett said:
A budget is a budget, and no matter how you play with the numbers to move money between accounts, at the end of the day you've still got money in and money out. The point isn't about exact numbers anyway, if you want to add in your employers payroll tax obligations, go for it. What it's about is understanding what you're voting for. If Joe Sixpack could see that every week he has $75 taken out of his check to pay for defense, maybe he'll think twice before pulling the lever for a Republican warmonger next time.
Click to expand...

Joe Sixpack didn't pay a dime towards Defense this year, neither did anyone else (at least via taxes).
 
cubby1223 said:
Seems to me you're trying to get at if people knew what they were forced to pay in to defense spending, they would demand those expenditures be cut. Has that worked to reign in the spending on Social Security & Medicare?
Click to expand...
Not necessarily, but I think people would demand more accountability though than there is now. People would be livid if they saw Congress authorize a multi-billion program after spending a few hundred million, possibly billions, in R&D and then have it canceled and have nothing to show for it.
 
her209 said:
This way:
- everyone with an earned income is paying for defense spending, not just the people who pay taxes
- everyone can see how much they are spending for defense
- should defense spending go up or down, the defense tax will go up or down
- lowers marginal tax rates because its not coming out of the "general" fund
Click to expand...

I actually agree with this, at the very minimum, it lets people see their "contribution" to the war effort. If it were doable (for those on electronic systems it'd be, those on non-electronic it wouldn't), I'd say break it out even further:

List Defense Total, and then list each of the major wars/actions for that pay period under it. Support going to Afghanistan? Fine, now that we're there, here's how much it's costing you.

Chuck
 
chucky2 said:
I actually agree with this, at the very minimum, it lets people see their "contribution" to the war effort. If it were doable (for those on electronic systems it'd be, those on non-electronic it wouldn't), I'd say break it out even further:

List Defense Total, and then list each of the major wars/actions for that pay period under it. Support going to Afghanistan? Fine, now that we're there, here's how much it's costing you.

Chuck
Click to expand...

That would require us paying for it in the first place. I guess you could tell them how much it is costing China but I doubt they would care nearly as much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top