• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Congratulations all 'you' whiners

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You're doing something wrong, or SOMETHING. I just watched someone play it on max graphics settings and it looks BEAUTIFUL, just like the original but with more interesting landscapes.

Those images are not what the game looks like on max, people.
 
http://www.ethereal-wind.net/iceicebaby.jpg

😀

Enthusiast Setting @ 16xQ @ 1920x1200 w/ V-Sync

http://www.ethereal-wind.net/dx10-max-16xQ.jpg

Gamer Setting @ 4x @ 1920x1200 w/o V-Sync

http://www.ethereal-wind.net/dx10-gamer-4x.jpg

Screen shot on second one got messed up a bit, but honestly, your screenshots and mine differ too much. I run about 24-30fps with custom settings between Enthusiasts/Gamer settings with 2x AA without V-Sync (first screen). Your screenshots definitely don't look like it was maxed out.

In either case, I was never all that 'impressed' with Crysis graphics to begin with, but I loved the ice, it looked so real.
 
Ok, I played Warhead for 3 or 4 hours tonight, and I can't really see any difference between this and the first Crysis, as far as graphics go. I maxed all graphic settings at 1680X1050 with no AA and to me it looked just as good as I remember. Granted, it has been 8 or 9 months since I played it, and I can't compare them side by side, but I can't notice a reduction in quality in Warhead from what I remember in the original.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top