• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Conan the Libertarian!!

Originally posted by: Centinel
yup....socially liberal, economically conservative.

hence, libertarian.
Click to expand...

Must be me.

Oh, and if Arnold could continue to prove to be fiscially conservative while maintaining his socially liberal status, I wouldn't mind him in the Whitehouse (pending Constitutional change of course).
 
It's too bad he won't actually join the Libertarian party.

I suspect this is because:

1. Libertarian who? (very few know who they are)

2. There's no money in it. Libertarians don't take money from special interest groups etc etc.

3. Americans generally understand either Democrat or Republican. They don't speak or understand Libertarian. Perhaps when the 2 party system is shattered they will.

Arnold on the other hand can sell some of these ideals under the flag of one or the other parties.
 
Originally posted by: Aelius
It's too bad he won't actually join the Libertarian party.

I suspect this is because:

1. Libertarian who? (very few know who they are)

2. There's no money in it. Libertarians don't take money from special interest groups etc etc.

3. Americans generally understand either Democrat or Republican. They don't speak or understand Libertarian. Perhaps when the 2 party system is shattered they will.

Arnold on the other hand can sell some of these ideals under the flag of one or the other parties.
Click to expand...

We need Condorcet voting for the third parties to have a chance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top