computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

[Silverforce11]

Skyrocket how exactly ? Show me the graph ...

AMD is still very much behind Nvidia when it comes to minimum frame rates in DX11 on Ashes ...

The graph is in the OP of this thread.

AMD's Crimson.

Compare that to prior Ashes benches from Computerbase on older drivers, AMD's DX11 was way worse.

http://www.computerbase.de/2015-08/...-nvidia/2/#abschnitt_benchmarks_in_1920__1080

Fury X DX11 1080p: 30 fps.

Basically there's been an accusation that AMD didn't bother to optimize Ashes on DX11, cos they have DX12 and wants it to look better. It's true. The DX11 vs 12 gap used to be massive. Now it's small.

 

[IllogicalGlory]

Also the celeron is supposed to be able to reach ~36FPS...

Are you surprised a 384 shader Kepler part can't keep up with a Haswell Celeron at high-ish settings?

 

[ThatBuzzkiller]

The graph is in the OP of this thread.

AMD's Crimson.

Compare that to prior Ashes benches from Computerbase on older drivers, AMD's DX11 was way worse.

http://www.computerbase.de/2015-08/...-nvidia/2/#abschnitt_benchmarks_in_1920__1080

Fury X DX11 1080p: 30 fps.

Basically there's been an accusation that AMD didn't bother to optimize Ashes on DX11, cos they have DX12 and wants it to look better. It's true. The DX11 vs 12 gap used to be massive. Now it's small.

Had you considered the optimizations on the developer's part ?

A 7 month gap between the first benchmarks and the final release will do just that ...

There's no reason to believe that AMD wouldn't be putting in good work to their DX11 drivers when a large percentage of the customers are still on Windows 7/8 ...

 

[TheELF]

Are you surprised a 384 shader Kepler part can't keep up with a Haswell Celeron at high-ish settings?

No I was surprised that atten's quad A10-7870K @ 4.2GHz gets rated for only ~40-42FPS,this game is supposed to scale on at least 16 threads after all.

 

[Azix]

http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/ashes_of_the_singularity_pc_performance_review/10

more tests. I get a bit pissed when I see nvidia losing performance. Its a worse situation to be in compared to kepler. If this remains the case, the more and more dx12 only games are released the more this will suck.

 

[Kenmitch]

http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/ashes_of_the_singularity_pc_performance_review/10

more tests. I get a bit pissed when I see nvidia losing performance. Its a worse situation to be in compared to kepler. If this remains the case, the more and more dx12 only games are released the more this will suck.

??? Close enough to fall into the does it really matter zone.

 

[Azix]

??? Close enough to fall into the does it really matter zone.

u mean the loss in performance? NO. hell no. not paying money to lose even 1 fps when I'm supposed to be gaining.

 

[AtenRa]

nv posted before

 

[AtenRa]

FX8350 OC to 4.4GHz
ASUS M5A97 R2.0
2x 4GB DDR-3 1966MHz (11-12-11)
VTX3D R9 390 default (+20% power limit)

Win 10 pro 64bit
Cat 16.4.2 Hitfix

Ashes Of The Singularity 1280x768 Extreme preset

 

[Flapdrol1337]

??? Close enough to fall into the does it really matter zone.

On the crazy settings it shows 27 fps minimum for dx11 and 20 for dx12. That's a pretty big drop.

http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/ashes_of_the_singularity_pc_performance_review/10

more tests. I get a bit pissed when I see nvidia losing performance. Its a worse situation to be in compared to kepler. If this remains the case, the more and more dx12 only games are released the more this will suck.

For the near future only xbone "exclusive" ports will be dx12 only, they've got the awful uwp and are only for sale in the microsoft store for ridiculous prices.

We can do without em.

 

[3DVagabond]

On the crazy settings it shows 27 fps minimum for dx11 and 20 for dx12. That's a pretty big drop.

Max and mins are meaningless without a plot.

 

[Flapdrol1337]

Max and mins are meaningless without a plot.

Minimum isn't meaningless. Though a plot would be better.

 

[3DVagabond]

Minimum isn't meaningless. Though a plot would be better.

If it's one spot at the start of the benchmark?

 

[TheELF]

FX8350 OC to 4.4GHz
ASUS M5A97 R2.0
2x 4GB DDR-3 1966MHz (11-12-11)
VTX3D R9 390 default (+20% power limit)

Win 10 pro 64bit
Cat 16.4.2 Hitfix

Ashes Of The Singularity 1280x768 Extreme preset

Yup 8 cores at 4,4Ghz = ~51FPS ,if the GPU ain't dragging you back,for everybody that tooted that Dx12 multi-core-threading graphics will be the shits.

 

[itsmydamnation]

3770 @ 4.3
290 at stock
3840x1024

looks like i now have justification to buy Vega/ pascal .