64-bit has security enhancements that 32-bit Vista is lacking. Considering the security game nowdays, and considering they could be using this rig for the next 5+ years in a worsening security environment, I would do 64-bit unless there were specific reasons NOT to.Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Yes.Originally posted by: MageXX9
Will I be able to install Office 2003 on 64 bit OS?
I'm wondering if I should just install the 32 bit version to save myself some headaches, or do you think I'll be fine?
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
I think I'd buy them something pre-built and let the OEM handle tech support. I just don't like having multiple calls asking the same question I just answered yesterday.
I have no problem answering calls from my Mom. Plus I *HATE* all that sh!t they install on your machine by default. If I want the Google Toolbar, and Google Desktop, I'll install it my d@mn self.
Originally posted by: mindless1
Not to be picky or anything but there is absolutely zero justification for any parts at all thus far because "parents" doesn't describe the expected use of the system. It's almost insane the way the thread is playing out, like a popularity contest of parts instead of the true virtue of a PC in that it's customizable. Dude, get a Dell if you're not going to customize towards their real needs per budget.
Originally posted by: mindless1
Not to be picky or anything but there is absolutely zero justification for any parts at all thus far because "parents" doesn't describe the expected use of the system. It's almost insane the way the thread is playing out, like a popularity contest of parts instead of the true virtue of a PC in that it's customizable. Dude, get a Dell if you're not going to customize towards their real needs per budget.
Originally posted by: mechBgon
64-bit has security enhancements that 32-bit Vista is lacking. Considering the security game nowdays, and considering they could be using this rig for the next 5+ years in a worsening security environment, I would do 64-bit unless there were specific reasons NOT to.Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Yes.Originally posted by: MageXX9
Will I be able to install Office 2003 on 64 bit OS?
I'm wondering if I should just install the 32 bit version to save myself some headaches, or do you think I'll be fine?
Originally posted by: John
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
I think I'd buy them something pre-built and let the OEM handle tech support. I just don't like having multiple calls asking the same question I just answered yesterday.
I have no problem answering calls from my Mom. Plus I *HATE* all that sh!t they install on your machine by default. If I want the Google Toolbar, and Google Desktop, I'll install it my d@mn self.
If you don't like the original factory install you can run the de-crapifier or do a clean OS install. They will also be able to still get the necessary support from the OEM.
Originally posted by: mindless1
Not to be picky or anything but there is absolutely zero justification for any parts at all thus far because "parents" doesn't describe the expected use of the system. It's almost insane the way the thread is playing out, like a popularity contest of parts instead of the true virtue of a PC in that it's customizable. Dude, get a Dell if you're not going to customize towards their real needs per budget.
QFT
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Does anyone know if I need DDR2 1066 for this chip. That's what the specs say, but I see other people using DDR2 800. What's up?
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Does anyone know if I need DDR2 1066 for this chip. That's what the specs say, but I see other people using DDR2 800. What's up?
You really only need ddr2 667. If you want some headroom for overclocking get the ddr2 800. I'm still not up to the full speed of my ram with the system and overclock in my sig. I'm at 370mhz fsb, so I still have 30mhz to go to get to the rams rated speed. The 1066 figure takes into account the fact that Intel fsb is quad pumped.
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Does anyone know if I need DDR2 1066 for this chip. That's what the specs say, but I see other people using DDR2 800. What's up?
You really only need ddr2 667. If you want some headroom for overclocking get the ddr2 800. I'm still not up to the full speed of my ram with the system and overclock in my sig. I'm at 370mhz fsb, so I still have 30mhz to go to get to the rams rated speed. The 1066 figure takes into account the fact that Intel fsb is quad pumped.
Man, I'm confused. So the E6320 runs at 1.8GHz, 266 x 7, right? And DDR2 runs double data rate, so with DDR2-533 you get a memory clock of 133 MHz which equals an I/O Bus Clock of 266 MHz.
So DDR2-533 is the minimum I'd need, but I can gain lots of speed with the lower latencies of the faster memory?
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: John
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
I think I'd buy them something pre-built and let the OEM handle tech support. I just don't like having multiple calls asking the same question I just answered yesterday.
I have no problem answering calls from my Mom. Plus I *HATE* all that sh!t they install on your machine by default. If I want the Google Toolbar, and Google Desktop, I'll install it my d@mn self.
If you don't like the original factory install you can run the de-crapifier or do a clean OS install. They will also be able to still get the necessary support from the OEM.
Originally posted by: mindless1
Not to be picky or anything but there is absolutely zero justification for any parts at all thus far because "parents" doesn't describe the expected use of the system. It's almost insane the way the thread is playing out, like a popularity contest of parts instead of the true virtue of a PC in that it's customizable. Dude, get a Dell if you're not going to customize towards their real needs per budget.
QFT
That seems like the most pointless thing. Do you buy a brand spanking new home that is built to your specs, and then rip out all the carpet. Do you buy a brand spanking new car and then re-paint it? It seems so odd that you buy a new computer with stuff that you neither want nor need. And, I priced a system with the same specs at Dell that cost twice what I've got.
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Does anyone know if I need DDR2 1066 for this chip. That's what the specs say, but I see other people using DDR2 800. What's up?
You really only need ddr2 667. If you want some headroom for overclocking get the ddr2 800. I'm still not up to the full speed of my ram with the system and overclock in my sig. I'm at 370mhz fsb, so I still have 30mhz to go to get to the rams rated speed. The 1066 figure takes into account the fact that Intel fsb is quad pumped.
Man, I'm confused. So the E6320 runs at 1.8GHz, 266 x 7, right? And DDR2 runs double data rate, so with DDR2-533 you get a memory clock of 133 MHz which equals an I/O Bus Clock of 266 MHz.
So DDR2-533 is the minimum I'd need, but I can gain lots of speed with the lower latencies of the faster memory?
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
pretty much right...faster memory is better in many ways. Some apps use the memory subsystem pretty heavily.
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
pretty much right...faster memory is better in many ways. Some apps use the memory subsystem pretty heavily.
Fast memory is only faster when it running at a high fsb. You can put in the fastest memory you can find in that computer, but if it isn't overclocked it'll only run at the default system speed.
Edited for missing word
That's a horrible analogy. In case you weren't aware Dell offers pc's without an OS since people are capable of loading their own OS and installing their own apps. Regardless, if you enjoy being the support guy and dealing with warranty issues by all means build a rig for your parents. Hopefully you won't have any hardware failures that require the pc to be down during the rma process, which could take 1-4 weeks depending on the part and company that you're dealing with.Originally posted by: MageXX9
That seems like the most pointless thing. Do you buy a brand spanking new home that is built to your specs, and then rip out all the carpet. Do you buy a brand spanking new car and then re-paint it? It seems so odd that you buy a new computer with stuff that you neither want nor need. And, I priced a system with the same specs at Dell that cost twice what I've got.
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
pretty much right...faster memory is better in many ways. Some apps use the memory subsystem pretty heavily.
Fast memory is only faster when it running at a high fsb. You can put in the fastest memory you can find in that computer, but if it isn't overclocked it'll only run at the default system speed.
Edited for missing word
If the SPD is read correctly it won't...They have memory dividers for a reason. Becides if you buy DDR2-800 and don't overclock your mobo you can run DDR2-800 speed still even if the default 266Mhz FSB would give DDR2-533
Originally posted by: John
That's a horrible analogy. In case you weren't aware Dell offers pc's without an OS since people are capable of loading their own OS and installing their own apps. Regardless, if you enjoy being the support guy and dealing with warranty issues by all means build a rig for your parents. Hopefully you won't have any hardware failures that require the pc to be down during the rma process, which could take 1-4 weeks depending on the part and company that you're dealing with.Originally posted by: MageXX9
That seems like the most pointless thing. Do you buy a brand spanking new home that is built to your specs, and then rip out all the carpet. Do you buy a brand spanking new car and then re-paint it? It seems so odd that you buy a new computer with stuff that you neither want nor need. And, I priced a system with the same specs at Dell that cost twice what I've got.
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
pretty much right...faster memory is better in many ways. Some apps use the memory subsystem pretty heavily.
Fast memory is only faster when it running at a high fsb. You can put in the fastest memory you can find in that computer, but if it isn't overclocked it'll only run at the default system speed.
Edited for missing word
If the SPD is read correctly it won't...They have memory dividers for a reason. Becides if you buy DDR2-800 and don't overclock your mobo you can run DDR2-800 speed still even if the default 266Mhz FSB would give DDR2-533
In my limited experience the C2Ds don't like being run out of sync with the fsb. My performance dropped when I tried raising my ram speed over stock.
Whoops, Edit again: The SPD settings only take timings, and voltage into account. If you put DDR2 1000 into that machine it would only run at 533mhz. That's assuming you didn't change anything in bios.
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: MageXX9
Does anyone know if I need DDR2 1066 for this chip. That's what the specs say, but I see other people using DDR2 800. What's up?
You really only need ddr2 667. If you want some headroom for overclocking get the ddr2 800. I'm still not up to the full speed of my ram with the system and overclock in my sig. I'm at 370mhz fsb, so I still have 30mhz to go to get to the rams rated speed. The 1066 figure takes into account the fact that Intel fsb is quad pumped.
Man, I'm confused. So the E6320 runs at 1.8GHz, 266 x 7, right? And DDR2 runs double data rate, so with DDR2-533 you get a memory clock of 133 MHz which equals an I/O Bus Clock of 266 MHz.
So DDR2-533 is the minimum I'd need, but I can gain lots of speed with the lower latencies of the faster memory?