Computer Chess Benchmark

JPQY

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2006
20
0
0
I think you all like testing,maybe i can give you something new...a other way to bench your computers and that with chess!

It's like PI but i use chess calculations!

Go to this link and Download my map?Arena+TogaII.rar?

http://www.cranox.com/Software/Arena/Arena.zip

Unrar and put the map somewhere
1.Copy this FEN code:

8/8/4B3/8/8/3K4/p2p4/kN1N4 w - - 0 5

2.Start the program ?Arena?
3.Imediately a 2nd window will pop up - "Cancel" this window!!
4.Press ?F6? = Test position comes on the chessboard

5.Click on ?Levels? and select ?Infinite?
6.Press space-bar

The chessprogram begins to calculate ,wait when you see in the 5th row ?+M13?!!
Then you can click on ?Stop? test is finised.
You can send your result with copy your screen or click on ?Postions? and select
?Copy Analyses to clipboard? and you can just paste this result in a new message to me!

Example picture:

http://image012.mylivepage.com/chunk12/214645/153/E6600%20at%203.6Ghz.png

Here you have the rating-list with there time finding the solution (Mate in 13 moves!) it's a little one...i can give you also more heavy tests!

1.Core 2 Duo E6600 at 3.6Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 00m37s!!
2.Core 2 Duo E6300 at 2.94Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 00m44s (131Mb HT)
3.Core 2 Duo E6700 (+M13) Depth 20 in 00m51s
4. AMD 4000+ (San Diego) at 2.80 GHz,2GB (+M13) Depth 20 in 00m57s
5.Opteron 165 at 2.8ghz+2GB (+M13) Depth 20 in 00m59s
6.AMD 3400+ Newcastle at 2.6Ghz,1GB (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m03s
7.AMD X2 4400+ 2.2Ghz at 2.5Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m04s (131Mb HT)
8.XPS M1210,Core 2 Duo T7400 2.16ghz Merom ES, 2GB (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m05s
9.AMD 3800+ at 2.5Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m05s
10. Pentium-M(dothan) @2.4ghz 1gb ram (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m10s
11.Pentium4 640 3.2Ghz at 4.0Ghz. (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m13s
12.Dell XPS Gen2 laptop 2.26 Pentium M + 1.256Gb (+M13) Depth 21 in 01m15s
13.AMD Athlon XP 3000+ at 2.33Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m21s
14.AMD Athlon XP-M at 2.3Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m21s (131Mb HT)
15.Amd 3400+ Newcastle at 2.4Ghz,512Mb (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m22s (65Mb HT)
16.AMD 3500+ Venice (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m27s (67Mb HT)
17.AMD X2 3800+ (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m26s (512Mb HT)
18.AMD 3700+ (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m26s (67Mb HT)
19.AMD Athlon XP 3000+ at 2.257Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m26s
20.Pentium 660 1Gb (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m27s
21.AMD Athlon XP 3000+ at 2.2Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m31s
22.Pentimum4 3.0e (presscott) Overclocked @ 3.679Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m33s
23.AMD X2 3800+ (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m35s (64Mb HT)
24.AMD Athlon XP 3000+ at 2.1Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m36s
25.AMD Athlon XP 3200+ at 2.2Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m36s
26.AMD Athlon 3200+ (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m38s
27.Pentium4 2.8Ghz at 3.2Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m39s
28.AMD 2500+ Barton (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m43s
29.Pentium4 Prescott 3.0Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m44s
30.Intel Celeron D355 at 3.3Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m56s
31.AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Newcastle @ 2.4Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 01m57s (64Mb HT)
32.Pentium4 2.4Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 02m09s
33.Pentium4 2Ghz at 2.66Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 02m09s
34.PPC G5 2Ghz (+M13) Depth 21 in 02m16s
35..Intel Celeron D 2.53Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 02m16s
36.Pentium4 2.4Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 02m19s
37.AMD Athlon XP 1700+ 1.47Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 02m37s
38.Pentium4 2Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 02m48s
39.Pentium Celeron315 at 2.26Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 03m11s (131Mb HT)
40.Pentium4 M 1.86Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 03m32s
41.Pentium4 1.7Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 03m59s
42.Amd t-bird 1.2ghz (+M13) Depth 21 in 04m18s
43.Pentium4 1.7Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 04m36s
44.Shuttle Celereon 1.7Ghz (+M13) Depth 20 in 04m41s
45.AMD ML-30 512mb (+M13) Depth 21 in 07m53s
46.Pentium3 500Mhz 170 Server (+M13) Depth 21 in 10m14s
47.Pentium3 866Mhz! (+M13) Depth 20 in 17m35s (10Mb HT)

Regards,
Jean-Paul.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
*looks at picture*

1. BC4 KxB1(forced)
2. KxD2 - black resigns

Two seconds, in my head, and didn't require running some random code that I downloaded. (No offense. It's a cool idea, but you're going to need to somehow prove that this isn't a trojan horse/knight/bishop.) ;)

- M4H
 

JPQY

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2006
20
0
0
Sorry,i'am 40 years,i have no time for this...trojan horse/knight/bishop things??
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: JPQY
Sorry,i'am 40 years,i have no time for this...trojan horse/knight/bishop things??

Validity of running an unsigned random piece of code that someone posts with no history here. Could be a virus/backdoor/remote control in the guise of a legit program. See "Trojan Horse" - the knight/bishop was an attempt at chess-based humour. :p

And I maintain I still have the best result, ergo my brain is much, much faster than a Conroe. :D

- M4H
 

CelSnip

Member
Jun 27, 2006
188
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: JPQY
Sorry,i'am 40 years,i have no time for this...trojan horse/knight/bishop things??

Validity of running an unsigned random piece of code that someone posts with no history here. Could be a virus/backdoor/remote control in the guise of a legit program. See "Trojan Horse" - the knight/bishop was an attempt at chess-based humour. :p

And I maintain I still have the best result, ergo my brain is much, much faster than a Conroe. :D

- M4H

I don't suppose you're going to calculate the 30 moves it take to get checkmate?

 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: CelSnip
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: JPQY
Sorry,i'am 40 years,i have no time for this...trojan horse/knight/bishop things??

Validity of running an unsigned random piece of code that someone posts with no history here. Could be a virus/backdoor/remote control in the guise of a legit program. See "Trojan Horse" - the knight/bishop was an attempt at chess-based humour. :p

And I maintain I still have the best result, ergo my brain is much, much faster than a Conroe. :D

- M4H

I don't suppose you're going to calculate the 30 moves it take to get checkmate?

I can't get into "chess thinking" without a physical board in front of me. :(

Black should tip the king after the short move sequence above though. K+B+N vs K is forced mate - making White execute it would be extremely bad form in a tournament.

- M4H