• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Compress your @*#(ing pictures before emailing them.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Does no one host their images? I just post a link to the flickr set of the pics I want my friends/family to see (actually post to fb or g+)...hardly email my friends and family.
 
Does no one host their images? I just post a link to the flickr set of the pics I want my friends/family to see (actually post to fb or g+)...hardly email my friends and family.

Hosting ftw. I go one further and offer multiple resolutions; 800x600 (yuck!), 1200x960, full res. Works great, and only a little more work for me.
 
Does no one host their images? I just post a link to the flickr set of the pics I want my friends/family to see (actually post to fb or g+)...hardly email my friends and family.

Are there any hosting services that easily let you download the entire album at the original image quality?
 
or theyll scan something and the item scanned is a small part of the image among a huge white space
Along these lines: Retailers that put a tiny 150x150px image of the item that's captioned "Click on image to enlarge," which links you to the same image. They should just add a little animation that points and laughs at you.
 
Along these lines: Retailers that put a tiny 150x150px image of the item that's captioned "Click on image to enlarge," which links you to the same image. They should just add a little animation that points and laughs at you.

Even worse: The stupid website forces MULTIPLE clicks to get to that tiny image.
 
Along these lines: Retailers that put a tiny 150x150px image of the item that's captioned "Click on image to enlarge," which links you to the same image. They should just add a little animation that points and laughs at you.

In their defense most of these retailers have thousands upon thousands of products and they just take the images and product descriptions copy and paste from the manufacturers web site. The "click to enlarge" is just a script that resizes images that happen to be larger to a small thumbnail size that looks better on their main product page. It's almost all automated.
 
In their defense most of these retailers have thousands upon thousands of products and they just take the images and product descriptions copy and paste from the manufacturers web site. The "click to enlarge" is just a script that resizes images that happen to be larger to a small thumbnail size that looks better on their main product page. It's almost all automated.
Alright, a script or something then:
IF (enlarged image size == original image size)
{
Remove "Enlarge Image" link from page.
}
🙂



Another kind of compression issue I run into on retail sites: "Spatial" compression

Newegg does it, and apparently Staples does it, as I just found.
They do this with their image viewer.
They do at least use high-resolution image, but only let you see a tiny portion of it at any one time - and the viewer window is not resizable. The image itself is 400x400 pixels. Who thought that this would be a good idea? Does anyone ever try to use their own creations before publishing them?
 
Last edited:
Alright, a script or something then:
IF (enlarged image size == original image size)
{
Remove "Enlarge Image" link from page.
}
🙂



Another kind of compression issue I run into on retail sites: "Spatial" compression

Newegg does it, and apparently Staples does it, as I just found.
They do this with their image viewer.
They do at least use high-resolution image, but only let you see a tiny portion of it at any one time - and the viewer window is not resizable. The image itself is 400x400 pixels. Who thought that this would be a good idea? Does anyone ever try to use their own creations before publishing them?

Yeah true that would be easy to do but, yeah they don't. lol

Probably because they use some turn key web store product to create their online storefront and it never had this feature.
 
High-resolution-alien-earth-wallpaper.jpg
Sweet! Thanks for the wallpaper!

Can I has 2560x1600 pls?
 
Back
Top