The DN
Let's have a look here.
First, other news supplants older stories as events happen/evolve. Both Comey and Rogers stated that Russians were the responsible party today. Doubt is gone at this point therefore there is nothing to explain.
Regarding Obama, I don't know what Obama did or did not say, however it's painfully obvious that after an election one would have more latitude with regards to negotiations than before. Nothing in the above statement shows that "flexibility to negotiate" meant an easing of sanctions on Russia. Indeed we've seen it was not the case at all.
Any discussion of "frothing liberals" is specious. The morality of the DNC actors is irrelevant in the context of an investigation to determine the facts of the matter of law regarding foreign parties, which again are found to be Russians.
Your argument is not a strong one.
The DNC and their willing accomplices are going to keep feeding their partisan solders like yourself to keep the fake story alive. But not that long ago the possibility of a "Russian Hack" was completely dismissed by your obama:
During an interview with the Daily Show’s Trevor Noah, Barack Obama denounced the conspiracy theory that Russians tampered with the American voting process.
“We were frankly more concerned in the run up to the election to the possibilities of vote tampering, which we did not see evidence of,” he admitted. “And we’re confident that we can guard against.”
More then likely the information breach was the result of a internal DNC leak. As far as obama's whispered statement to the Russians,
"flexibility to negotiate"...would require a separate investigation to find out what was "negotiated" and what he possibly "signed off on " and did he have the legal authority...what did congress know about the obama's "secret" negotiations" with the Russians??