PELLEY:You know, in '76, Jimmy Carter famously said, "I will not lie to you."
CLINTON: Well, I have to tell you I have tried in every way I know how literally from my years as a young lawyer all the way through my time as secretary of state to level with the American people.
PELLEY:You talk about leveling with the American people. Have you always told the truth?
CLINTON:I've always tried to. Always. Always.
PELLEY:Some people are gonna call that wiggle room that you just gave yourself.
CLINTON:Well, no, I've always tried --
PELLEY:I mean, Jimmy Carter said, "I will never lie to you."
CLINTON:Well, but, you know, you're asking me to say, "Have I ever?" I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever will. I'm gonna do the best I can to level with the American people.
Comey intentionally covered up Russian interference in our election on behalf of Trump, but felt it was important to factlessly smear Hillary a week before an election.
Doesn't change that she dodged the question. I never claimed Trump was honest or that there wasn't a double standard. But quotes like the one I provides certainly didn't help her.Definition of "honest" according to GOP when applied to HRC: "HAVE YOU EVER LIED IN YOUR LIFE? WILL YOU PROMISE US THAT YOU'LL NEVER LIE? AND QUIT YOUR JOB AND MOVE TO RUSSIA IF WE PROVE YOU LIED? "
Definition of "honest" according to GOP when applied to Trump: "IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE SAYING THIS, BUT I CAN TELL YOU MEAN THIS, SO YOU DEFINITELY ARE BEING TRUTHFUL. WHY CAN'T HILLARY BE SO PLEASANTLY DUPLICITOUS?
The sad part is, HRC is so honest she refused to lie about lying in the future. If she had lied, and said she'd never lie, Pelley would've gone nuts. Of course, none of the same standards apply to Trump. Or any other politician, for that matter.
Doesn't change that she dodged the question. I never claimed Trump was honest or that there wasn't a double standard. But quotes like the one I provides certainly didn't help her.
Jimmy Carter or Obama could have handled answering the question. People like me don't care for Trump but also recognize that Clinton was probably the worst candidate to face him.It's a stupid question, considering she's a politician who literally is required to lie about certain things merely to keep her job. But I guess for Trumpeters and people like you it's some kind of "gotcha" moment....
Only completely brain dead idiots believe Hillary wasn't a good candidate. People that are incapable of determining what is fact and what is pure fabrication. Unfortunately a large portion of the population is just as hapless as you are.Jimmy Carter or Obama could have handled answering the question. People like me don't care for Trump but also recognize that Clinton was probably the worst candidate to face him.
She wasn't a good candidate. Obama was a good candidate. That is why he won and she did not.Only completely brain dead idiots believe Hillary wasn't a good candidate. People that are incapable of determining what is fact and what is pure fabrication. Unfortunately a large portion of the population is just as hapless as you are.
Obama was a horrible candidate. Born in Kenya. Wanted to implement Sharia Law. Thankfully our devoted GOP members were able to stop him.She wasn't a good candidate. Obama was a good candidate. That is why he won and she did not.
If condescending remarks is the warm blanket of comfort that you require to help you through denial, I will not rob you of it.
Obama was a horrible candidate. Born in Kenya. Wanted to implement Sharia Law. Thankfully our devoted GOP members were able to stop him.
I think you are serious. Which makes this one of the dumbest posts of the week. Congrats on making it to Saturday!
That ridiculous line of attack was the best the GOP could come up with against Obama, and it was nothing more than a distraction. The Democrats lost legislative footing complements of fossils like Reid and Pelosi.Obama was a horrible candidate. Born in Kenya. Wanted to implement Sharia Law. Thankfully our devoted GOP members were able to stop him.
Only completely brainwashed loons believe she was a good one.Only completely brain dead idiots believe Hillary wasn't a good candidate.
Yes, that's a perfect example of her nuanced, legalistic approach to being truthful. Good lawyers always qualify their statements because the real world is never perfectly black and white. There's always some detail you missed, or circumstance that will change. Just ask George H. W. "Read my lips, no new taxes" Bush how that works.PELLEY:You know, in '76, Jimmy Carter famously said, "I will not lie to you."
CLINTON: Well, I have to tell you I have tried in every way I know how literally from my years as a young lawyer all the way through my time as secretary of state to level with the American people.
PELLEY:You talk about leveling with the American people. Have you always told the truth?
CLINTON:I've always tried to. Always. Always.
PELLEY:Some people are gonna call that wiggle room that you just gave yourself.
CLINTON:Well, no, I've always tried --
PELLEY:I mean, Jimmy Carter said, "I will never lie to you."
CLINTON:Well, but, you know, you're asking me to say, "Have I ever?" I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever will. I'm gonna do the best I can to level with the American people.
Sorry, but you don't understand what makes a good candidate. I agree Clinton would have probably made a pretty decent President, and potentially even a very good one She has solid qualifications, and in spite of the epic smear campaign by the GOP, Russians, and FBI, is no more corrupt than any other D.C. politician.Only completely brain dead idiots believe Hillary wasn't a good candidate. People that are incapable of determining what is fact and what is pure fabrication. Unfortunately a large portion of the population is just as hapless as you are.
I agree. It was nuanced. It was legalistic. And it was truthful in that she was incapable of affirmatively answering a fairly straightforward question.Yes, that's a perfect example of her nuanced, legalistic approach to being truthful. Good lawyers always qualify their statements because the real world is never perfectly black and white. There's always some detail you missed, or circumstance that will change. Just ask George H. W. "Read my lips, no new taxes" Bush how that works.
Good lawyers try to use accurate and precise language. Unfortunately, that precision makes for a lousy politician. People like politicians tolie through their teethtell them what they want to hear. That's why Donnie is such a god to his flock. He shamelessly lied his ass off, and they loved him for it.
The real world is never perfectly black and white. Have YOU always told the truth? Yes or no?I agree. It was nuanced. It was legalistic. And it was truthful in that she was incapable of affirmatively answering a fairly straightforward question.
Do or do not. There is no try.
No one has, hence the ludicracy of her saying "I believe I always have" or "try to". Given the context of the question, an affirmation of not telling the truth and providing context in plain language on what she learned in not doing so, would have buried the issue.The real world is never perfectly black and white. Have YOU always told the truth? Yes or no?
You live in a fantasy world, my friend. Had Clinton, or any Democrat admitted to lying to the American public, the vitriolic howling on the right would never end. From that point forward, every single thing she said would be challenged with, "Are you lying to us again?" That's not limited to Democratic candidates. Had any Republican candidate (except probably Donnie) made such an admission, the howling from the left would be almost as bad. Americans do not reward such direct honesty in its politicians.No one has, hence the ludicracy of her saying "I believe I always have" or "try to". Given the context of the question, an affirmation of not telling the truth and providing context in plain language on what she learned in not doing so, would have buried the issue.
She wasn't a good candidate. Obama was a good candidate. That is why he won and she did not.
If condescending remarks is the warm blanket of comfort that you require to help you through denial, I will not rob you of it.
I think Sanders was the better candidate in that he understood the populist undercurrent fueling this election, and he did remarkable well considering he was a relative unknown going against the well established Clinton brand with the DNC establishment tipping the scales in her favor.Do you consider Sanders to have been a good candidate? The 'bad' candidate crushed him. I'm amazed how many Sanders supporters have convinced themselves he was such a great candidate and somehow he lost by millions of votes because the DNC said something mean about him in an email instead of just recognizing that he didn't appeal to large swaths of the Democratic coalition.
I remember Hamilton Nolan at Gawker being angry and baffled as to why black people weren't flocking to Sanders because he somehow didn't realize they didn't give a shit about student loan forgiveness. I also remember going to a Sanders rally in Prospect Park and seeing that there were basically no black people there despite the park being surrounded on two sides by heavily black neighborhoods.
In an election the Democrats lost in large part due to lesser black turnout let me register my doubt that nominating the guy almost no black people voted for would have helped.
