- Apr 28, 2006
- 4,257
- 0
- 0
My dad had a bet with the guys he works with over the combustion of gasoline. They said that when gasoline burns, it is only the vapor that burns not the liquid and that the liquid can never burn under any circumstances. He says that under certain circumstances (which he has no knowledge of) the heat can be so great that the liquid will burn.
I told my dad that the combustion of liquid fuels can only occur when the vapor oxidizes above its flash point and forms an ignitable mixture (I think). He responded by saying that there must be some point in which the heat is so great (such as the surface of the sun) that the liquid itself is burned. I told him that even though it might appear to have burned the liquid, it still evaporated, oxidized, and burned the vapor, just within billionths of a second. He then asked me whether the liquid itself would burn if it were in a vacuum. I told him that in order to burn, the vapor must be oxidized first, and that there is no oxygen within a vacuum. However, he's still being very adamant about it, insisting that he must be right (because he doesn't want to pay up
). I tried searching for an answer to this question but came up dry. Can any of you absolutely confirm this question either way? He's the kind of person that won't let up unless he has overwhelming proof.
I told my dad that the combustion of liquid fuels can only occur when the vapor oxidizes above its flash point and forms an ignitable mixture (I think). He responded by saying that there must be some point in which the heat is so great (such as the surface of the sun) that the liquid itself is burned. I told him that even though it might appear to have burned the liquid, it still evaporated, oxidized, and burned the vapor, just within billionths of a second. He then asked me whether the liquid itself would burn if it were in a vacuum. I told him that in order to burn, the vapor must be oxidized first, and that there is no oxygen within a vacuum. However, he's still being very adamant about it, insisting that he must be right (because he doesn't want to pay up
