Originally posted by: Chiropteran
Originally posted by: txrandom
Soda offers no nutritional value while beef and chicken does.
I drink soda a few times a week to enjoy. But I know that stuff isn't good for you, so I'll usually drink water, tea, milk, or juice the rest of the time.
Incorrect. Soda contains mostly water, and has virtually the same nutritional value of water.
You get shipwrecked on a deserted island with no fresh water and you have to survive a week, would you rather have a few bottles of coke or would you rather have 3 lbs of lean ground chicken?
If you really meant soda offers no nutritional value other than that of the water it contains, I'll agree with that. In which case my comparison is equally valid. Beef has no nutritional value other than the proteins and vitamins it contains. If you can get the same proteins and vitamins from a whey protein shake, without the fats, why eat beef?
If you just want to eat the absolute healthiest things you can, I'd agree with you. But, if variety and taste matter, it doesn't matter if one drink is .05% more healthy than the alternative.
I agree with you.
And a big part of why Coke is bad is the calories. Coke Zero has no calories. That doesn't mean chugging a 12 pack a day is a good idea, but nothing done in excess is a good idea.
 
				
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 Facebook
Facebook Twitter
Twitter