***COAST TO COAST POLLS CLOSED*** RESULTS: UP IN THE AIR

[Rage187]

damn Dems, give up. Dont start this recount sh1t again, it just makes you look worse then 2000.

 

[FoBoT]

Originally posted by: RadioHead84

Originally posted by: FreshPrince
someone explain to me why ohio is going to bush?!?

voter fraud

libs are the experts at voter fraud

 

[Rage187]

Originally posted by: FoBoT

Originally posted by: RadioHead84

Originally posted by: FreshPrince
someone explain to me why ohio is going to bush?!?

voter fraud

libs are the experts at voter fraud

they perfected it.


The dead have the right to vote!!!!

 

[George P Burdell]

iowa vote counting machines have failed. fixed by wednesday. diebold just won iowa.

 

[z0mb13]

Originally posted by: Pocatello
According to CNN, Bush is winning more than 50% of the popular vote, which hasn't been done since his dad did it in 1988.

clinton didnt win the popular vote???

 

[Eli]

Welp, it looks like it's all over for Kerry.



Oh well. At least we know Bush will be gone in 4 years. But that's not exactly reassuring. Just think of the carnage he could reap without the worry of being re-elected.

 

[FoBoT]

Originally posted by: z0mb13

Originally posted by: Pocatello
According to CNN, Bush is winning more than 50% of the popular vote, which hasn't been done since his dad did it in 1988.

clinton didnt win the popular vote???

no, in 1992, the Perot factor kept him down, in 1996 it was probably Nader's fault, i would have to look that one up

 

[hdeck]

Originally posted by: z0mb13

Originally posted by: Pocatello
According to CNN, Bush is winning more than 50% of the popular vote, which hasn't been done since his dad did it in 1988.

clinton didnt win the popular vote???

didn't win the *majority* of the popular vote

 

[z0mb13]

wow I always thought clinton won the popular vote in a landslide.. guess not huh

 

[mobobuff]

Nevermind.

 

[FoBoT]

Iowa and New Mexico are getting very close to going Bush

 

[FoBoT]

the Kerry campaign is fixing to make (Edwards) a statement

he is the lawyer, so he'll out line the lawsuit strategy to try and get Ohio back

 

[FoBoT]

the Democratic lawyers are boarding planes to fly to Ohio, the Dems are going to try and steal the election in the courts of Ohio

 

[hdeck]

wow john, thanks for that one

 

[IgorFL]

Well thank goodness my cat Fluffy's right to vote is going to be protected.

 

[MikeMike]

looks like washingtons prediction by winning was wrong.
nickelodeons prediction was wrong

and yet again

Ohio picks the winning candidate.

MIKE

 

[rocadelpunk]

from ohio..

been up all night/morning.

 

[Pocatello]

Now I know why Kerry got Edward for VP, time to start suing!

 

[Rage187]

wake me up when the Dems put away their lawyers and man up that they lost.


and WTF has CCN given the Repubs Nevada and New Mexico?

 

[MikeMike]

Kerry literally needs like 100K votes his way from one county in ohio. not going to happen. since 85% of the precincts have already reported.

MIKE

 

[hdeck]

bush has a 140K lead in ohio now...

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Originally posted by: FoBoT

Originally posted by: z0mb13

Originally posted by: Pocatello
According to CNN, Bush is winning more than 50% of the popular vote, which hasn't been done since his dad did it in 1988.

clinton didnt win the popular vote???

no, in 1992, the Perot factor kept him down, in 1996 it was probably Nader's fault, i would have to look that one up

Didn't Perot run twice? I thought Nader didn't start putting a serious dent in Democrat numbers until Bush/Gore 2000.

 

[FoBoT]

Pres. Bush may come on tonight after Nevada and New Mexico go to him

i was ready to hit the bed, but if the President speaks, i want to hear it

 

[FoBoT]

Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven

Originally posted by: FoBoT

Originally posted by: z0mb13

Originally posted by: Pocatello
According to CNN, Bush is winning more than 50% of the popular vote, which hasn't been done since his dad did it in 1988.

clinton didnt win the popular vote???

no, in 1992, the Perot factor kept him down, in 1996 it was probably Nader's fault, i would have to look that one up

Didn't Perot run twice? I thought Nader didn't start putting a serious dent in Democrat numbers until Bush/Gore 2000.

yeah, you are right, but i only voted for him the first time, i voted for dole in '96

Bill Clinton (Democrat) 47,402,357 49.24

Bob Dole (Republican) 39,198,755 40.71

Ross Perot (Reform) 8,085,402 8.40

Ralph Nader (Green) 685,128 .71

Harry Browne (Libertarian) 485,798 .50

 

[GoingUp]

Bush is up by 3.6 million overall and 140K in ohio. The dems need to concede.