Gardener
Senior member
- Nov 22, 1999
- 770
- 561
- 136
He's a Midwest liberal. He is not going to be combative.I wish Walz would be more combative. I appreciate that he's sticking to the issues and policies but Vance needs a good slapping with facts!
Vance did better than I expected, but he comes across smug and Walz seems like someone I could have a beer with. And Vance did a pretty terrible job of actually answering questions. I also laughed when he started out his rebuttal to the question about why housing is so expensive "I'm not blaming immigrants for it" and proceeded to mostly blame immigrants for 2 minutes. He's more likable than Trump, but that's about as low of a metric as you can get. And he smartly started most of his answers and rebuttals with something about Harris and the illegals.
Walz was far too nice, nobody on team MAGA or the blue side heard anything to sway them. But the weird still undecided crowd might have actually been influenced by Vances constant illegal immigrants blabbering. And the moderators choice on what to actually fact check was odd. Vance lied a lot and they ignored most of it. They decided to ask Walz about lying about when he was in China. But there was no question to Vance about the shit he made up about Springfield. That was a huge omission and I wonder why?
MAGAs can't bitch about the mods not being fair, Vance even won the virtual coin flip for who goes last. Why was it a virtual one tho? That seems unnecessary, and how do we know it wasn't rigged?
He had no trouble making a couch joke at the DNCHe's a Midwest liberal. He is not going to be combative.