- Mar 4, 2000
- 27,370
- 239
- 106
Ok. But what exactly is the logic behind that? You still have to clone the internal drive to the external drive occasionally, and the "restore" procedure will be the same. Why not always keep the same drive in the machine and use the other for the clone/backup? Why all the drive swapping?
There is an added benefit that I have used for many years. By rotating drives, the wear and tear is halved. Example, on this old machine, I change drives evbery Tuesday or Wednesday morning. The active drive runs 24/7 for a week. Then it gets a week off. And, yes, I do clone to an external drive occasionally. However, that is a clone, and for emergency use only. Should it be necessary (it was two weeks ago) I can then clone from the external back to the internal, and no restore is involved. The only machine that requires actual physical swapping is the laptop, and swapping the drive takes less than two minutes. No restore or clone job can work that fast. Simply put, my drive swapping is for me, the more efficient option. And, it extends the life of the drive by using it half as much. In general, I prefer hardware solutions to software ones. And, no matter where I travel or what I do, I always have a "spare tire" ready at hand.
Last edited: