Clinton's ready to move on, why aren't you Dems?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
In life, you take the best available information at the time and make a decision.

Everyone's a genius in hindsight.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Where was Bush's mistake and what should he apolgize for?

He had bad intelligence. It happens. Get over it.

Uhh....

Which bad intelligence do you refer to? The bad intelligence that failed to prevent the murder of 3000 of our own people on our soil, or the bad intelligence that led to the deaths of nearly 600 US Soldiers and thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians?

Because I'm not getting over either any time soon...

I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:

"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."

What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Where was Bush's mistake and what should he apolgize for?

He had bad intelligence. It happens. Get over it.

Uhh....

Which bad intelligence do you refer to? The bad intelligence that failed to prevent the murder of 3000 of our own people on our soil, or the bad intelligence that led to the deaths of nearly 600 US Soldiers and thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians?

Because I'm not getting over either any time soon...

I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:

"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."

What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???

By whom? You after the fact?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:

"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."

What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???

By whom? You after the fact?

I know this thread has only been up here for about a month but, here ya go:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1271254
 

Shuxclams

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
9,286
15
81
Riprorin, are you just new to this or stoopid? Seems to me you like to flame bait......






I say ban him.











SHUX
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:

"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."

What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???

By whom? You after the fact?

I know this thread has only been up here for about a month but, here ya go:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1271254

You say he lied, prove it and I'll shut up.

As far as being stupid, it's stupid people that taking unsubstantiated, unproved allegations as fact.

Not only is that stupid, but it's slanderous.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
I know this thread has only been up here for about a month but, here ya go:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1271254

You say he lied, prove it and I'll shut up.

As far as being stupid, it's stupid people that taking unsubstantiated, unproved allegations as fact.

Not only is that stupid, but it's slanderous.

I said he MISLED, not LIED. I have said the whole administration has deceived us.

That report is proof enough.

But, to those who pray nightly to the Bush-God, I guess you'll just need to be smacked upside the head by a member of Al Qaeda (or some other militant Islamic group) before you realize how badly Bush has destroyed foreign relations.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Where was Bush's mistake and what should he apolgize for?

He had bad intelligence. It happens. Get over it.


If you don't think he's made any mistakes that's your opinion. don't expect everybody's gonna agree with you.