Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Where was Bush's mistake and what should he apolgize for?
He had bad intelligence. It happens. Get over it.
Uhh....
Which bad intelligence do you refer to? The bad intelligence that failed to prevent the murder of 3000 of our own people on our soil, or the bad intelligence that led to the deaths of nearly 600 US Soldiers and thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians?
Because I'm not getting over either any time soon...
I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:
"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Where was Bush's mistake and what should he apolgize for?
He had bad intelligence. It happens. Get over it.
Uhh....
Which bad intelligence do you refer to? The bad intelligence that failed to prevent the murder of 3000 of our own people on our soil, or the bad intelligence that led to the deaths of nearly 600 US Soldiers and thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians?
Because I'm not getting over either any time soon...
I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:
"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."
What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:
"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."
What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???
By whom? You after the fact?
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm refering to this bit of intelligence used as "evidence" here that the Pres. Bush lied:
"In his State of the Union speech in February justifying the planned war in Iraq, Bush referred to British intelligence reports that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons production."
What part of "that was known to be bad intelligence when Bush mentioned it in the State of the Union speech" do you not understand???
By whom? You after the fact?
I know this thread has only been up here for about a month but, here ya go:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1271254
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
I know this thread has only been up here for about a month but, here ya go:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1271254
You say he lied, prove it and I'll shut up.
As far as being stupid, it's stupid people that taking unsubstantiated, unproved allegations as fact.
Not only is that stupid, but it's slanderous.
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Where was Bush's mistake and what should he apolgize for?
He had bad intelligence. It happens. Get over it.
