Clinton Support Drops - Sanders Supporters Surge

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
I would be amazed if we ended up with a real progressive in the White House.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Both Trump and Clinton are center-right for the most part. The difference is that one is alientating hispanics and minorities. I'm certainly not saying he can't win, but something will need to change over the next 14 months for him to have a real shot.

I believe the differences are greater than that. Clinton has a great deal of experience wrt govt service whereas Trump only has experience serving himself & his massive ego.

Hillary is a seasoned technocrat. Trump is an experienced charlatan who's fleeced more investors than either of us will ever meet.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,862
7,395
136
I believe the differences are greater than that. Clinton has a great deal of experience wrt govt service whereas Trump only has experience serving himself & his massive ego.

Hillary is a seasoned technocrat. Trump is an experienced charlatan who's fleeced more investors than either of us will ever meet.

Agreed, the differences are stark and telling, with Hillary's chances looking much better than Trump's.

That being said though, it seems to me the Repub rank and file are so desperate for a win that they'd actually rally around Trump if it looked like he'd have any kind of a chance to do to Hillary what he's been managing to do to Jeb and any of the other Repubs in the running. And maybe even the RNC is coming around to the idea that Trump "could" be the last person standing and they're already trying to bring him into the insider club to assimilate him into pursuing their agenda rather than his own.

As and aside, I'm thinking the only Repub in the running that can actually stand toe to toe with Trump is Fiorina. And if it came down to that, I'd say she would be able to give him a good slapping around before he could recover his wits and neutralize her in any way.
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,828
4,777
146
ST_13.04.16.13_AsianIncome.png



I don't have that data. But Pew Research has some published some related surveys. Note, unlike the previous posting the image above shows income rather than wealth...

Asian-Americans Lead All Others in Household Income


Rise of Asian Americans

Uno


But... but... Asians are immigrants and minorities. That means they are being oppressed and held against their will from succeeding in life... Right? RIGHT?!

At least, that's what Obama told me. They are suffering, completely oppressed, and racism is preventing them from moving up in life D:









Oh wait... they are doing better than whitey? ...... Well... shit.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,667
8,021
136
Agreed, the differences are stark and telling, with Hillary's chances looking much better than Trump's.

That being said though, it seems to me the Repub rank and file are so desperate for a win that they'd actually rally around Trump if it looked like he'd have any kind of a chance to do to Hillary what he's been managing to do to Jeb and any of the other Repubs in the running. And maybe even the RNC is coming around to the idea that Trump "could" be the last person standing and they're already trying to bring him into the insider club to assimilate him into pursuing their agenda rather than his own.

As and aside, I'm thinking the only Repub in the running that can actually stand toe to toe with Trump is Fiorina. And if it came down to that, I'd say she would be able to give him a good slapping around before he could recover his wits and neutralize her in any way.
Fiorina sounds reasonable when you're listening to the delusions of the rest of them.

If the base is in charge, I'd expect Cruz, as he is Donald Trump with "insider" qualities of being a sitting Senator. Every single time the GOP loses an election, the lament is that the candidate just wasn't conservative enough.

How often does Trump attack Cruz? If it's near zero, take it as a hint.

But... but... Asians are immigrants and minorities. That means they are being oppressed and held against their will from succeeding in life... Right? RIGHT?!

At least, that's what Obama told me. They are suffering, completely oppressed, and racism is preventing them from moving up in life D:

Oh wait... they are doing better than whitey? ...... Well... shit.
Step 1: just make shit up.
Step 2: set shit on fire
Step 3: inhale burning shit
Step 4: post nonsense
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
Clinton is the next president.

She's the only one who won't rock the boat.

Bernie is great, don't get me wrong. He would just bring about too much change.

Hilary will continue the lies, corruption, and deceptions that have been prominent from the Oval Office for the past 30 years. She may be the worst person to have run for President in the past 30 years, but this is just a credit to her ability to adapt.
 

Murloc

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2008
5,382
65
91
I believe the differences are greater than that. Clinton has a great deal of experience wrt govt service whereas Trump only has experience serving himself & his massive ego.

Hillary is a seasoned technocrat. Trump is an experienced charlatan who's fleeced more investors than either of us will ever meet.
This.
In other countries you can also say that politicians are surrounded by party technicians, but in the US the president really has strong personal power and can really be dangerous.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
But she's a DINO, isn't she, according to the right wing concern trolls?

And if she's more like Repubs than many liberals would like, why would righties call her supporters fanatics?

Actually Wallstreet would love a Bush/Clinton 2016. It would mean buisness as usual regardless of who wins.

http://theweek.com/speedreads/454351/wall-street-love-hillary-clinton-vs-jeb-bush-2016

“If it turns out to be Jeb versus Hillary we would love that and either outcome would be fine,” one top Republican-leaning Wall Street lawyer said over lunch in midtown Manhattan last week. “We could live with either one. Jeb versus Joe Biden would also be fine. It’s Rand Paul or Ted Cruz versus someone like Elizabeth Warren that would be everybody’s worst nightmare.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/...ans-hillary-clinton-2016-106070#ixzz3l05srCD1
 
Last edited:

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,667
8,021
136
Actually Wallstreet would love a Bush/Clinton 2016. It would mean buisness as usual regardless of who wins.

http://theweek.com/speedreads/454351/wall-street-love-hillary-clinton-vs-jeb-bush-2016

“If it turns out to be Jeb versus Hillary we would love that and either outcome would be fine,” one top Republican-leaning Wall Street lawyer said over lunch in midtown Manhattan last week. “We could live with either one. Jeb versus Joe Biden would also be fine. It’s Rand Paul or Ted Cruz versus someone like Elizabeth Warren that would be everybody’s worst nightmare.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/...ans-hillary-clinton-2016-106070#ixzz3l05srCD1
Big business has most of the money and writes the laws before handing them to the politicians to pass. The media is big business - in fact, some of the biggest businesses are the media.

Don't rock the boat. Don't upset the apple cart. Whatever phrase you prefer, that means: don't fuck up the status quo for the people who own and operate everything.

The disenchantment on both the left and right with modern US politics are usually just differences in how we describe the problems and the causes, and these visions are often used to divide people into left and right tribes.

It's getting harder to hide this as technology and information delivery advance. It also makes maintaining the status quo harder, which is why the rhetoric has to be amped up to 11 all the time.

Tell people that if the other side wins, the whole country dies. That helps maintain the current divisions. But the most important thing that occurs is that "option 3" is totally pushed aside.

I don't consider Ted Cruz to be "option 3", but people like Rand Paul, Trump, and Sanders are definitely "option 3" because they aren't status quo warriors, by their existence among but not particularly of the two established parties.

I definitely consider Sanders to be the most honest of "option 3" candidates, because if you take a look at what he's said for the past 40+ years, he doesn't go back and forth. What he said 40 years ago is still his stance today...and usually his stances don't involve GE, Comcast, and Boeing making even more profits while continuing to write our tax and foreign policy legislation.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I'm actually all for Bernie.

I just have a hard time seeing it happen.

If he's there at the end, I'll probably vote for him.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Clinton is the next president.
She's the only one who won't rock the boat.

Problem is..the boat NEEDS to be rocked.... and yes, ALL she will "achieve" is keeping the current Status Quo.

I am looking at her policies and I don't even know why she is "democrat". She could go over to the Reps and would fit right in.
 
Last edited:

kstu

Golden Member
Feb 23, 2004
1,544
31
91
But... but... Asians are immigrants and minorities. That means they are being oppressed and held against their will from succeeding in life... Right? RIGHT?!

At least, that's what Obama told me. They are suffering, completely oppressed, and racism is preventing them from moving up in life D:









Oh wait... they are doing better than whitey? ...... Well... shit.
Newsflash kid, you're not nearly as smart or witty as you seem to think you are.
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,828
4,777
146
Newsflash kid, you're not nearly as smart or witty as you seem to think you are.

That is an excellent counter to my point good sir. You have excellent debate skills that are fit for a children's daycare on whose turn it is on the swing set.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,549
7,974
136
Hillary I'd say, bit it's still a long ways off.

Just thinking about Hildabeast ruins the food I cooked for me and my wife on the weber kettle today. She just leaves a bad taste on everything.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
It appears they have Pagliano over a barrel. He neglected to declare the income from the Clinton's. Now, it's going to be "Let's Make a Deal" time.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...48a40f8_story.html?postshare=3851441420685618
Have him over a barrel, how? He (possibly) violated his employer's policy by not disclosing outside income. What are they going to do, fire him? He quit in 2013.


Edit: Disregard. I did a little digging. Apparently, "Knowing and willfully ..." providing inaccurate or incomplete information on this form can be grounds for criminal prosecution. I have no context to know how likely that is, but it is at least a potential consequence. It could well be why Pagliano said he would take the Fifth.
 
Last edited:

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Be interesting to see if he did declare it to the IRS?
Not really relevant to the matter at hand although it would further discredit him.

I would be very interested to hear the particulars of his maintaining the server from a security perspective. Patches, inspection of logs, what security devices were between it and the Internet, etc. Seeing as how the .gov can't keep their in-house maintained servers from prying eyes even with the resources at their disposal, Pagliano's testimony could be very interesting. Of course he can still choose to plead the fifth and end up for certain in a court room. Clam up or a deal. Time to spin the wheel of choice.
 

cabri

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2012
3,616
1
81
Gawd you're lame. What are they gonna do- fire him?
They can prevent him for doing any business with the Federal Government.
As an employee, employee of a contractor and/or a consultant.