Clint Eastwood's Unforgiven

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
Originally posted by: beach2nd1
random guy in bar: "You just shot an unarmed man!"

clint: "Well, he should have armed himself." :D

It's better when you don't screw up the quote and you are the first person to post it in a thread... ;)
 

fitzov

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2004
2,477
0
0
I was expecting a gunslinging action flick, but instead got a dramatic tale of cowboys and their gritty lives.

That's most likely why you were disappointed. I liked the film because the characters actually had some depth to them--they were more human.
 

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
Originally posted by: weirdichi
I was expecting a gunslinging action flick, but instead got a dramatic tale of cowboys and their gritty lives. Maybe that's where it went wrong, but I still just found this movie "meh" and not "Wow!"

I thoroughly enjoyed Tombstone, but this movie just wasn't there for me. It gave a different perspective on the cowboy life and how you can never escape it, but still left me unsatisfied. Anybody wanna turn my "meh" into a "Wow!"?

Also, there was no mention of Ned as being black at all in the film. Was he supposed to portray a white man, or did everybody in the whole movie just not notice that he was black?

Go watch The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. That will get you your "WoW!"
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Further proof that you cant teach taste.

Unforgiven is a fantastic movie with an ensemble cast. I love all the archetypical characters. Gene Hackman is as good or better than Eastwood. I love how he completely abuses that poser English Bob.

so you just label somebody that doesn't share your opinions as "tasteless"?
As much as I liked Unforgiven I thought it was a little too hyped.
There were two reasons for that: It's been years since a decent Western was out, and Clint Eastwood is a media darling. Especially then.
Don't get me wrong. I love Unforgiven. (Duck of Earl part cracks me up)
IMHO, I thought Open Range was underrated.
 

TheAdvocate

Platinum Member
Mar 7, 2005
2,561
7
81
Originally posted by: foghorn67
so you just label somebody that doesn't share your opinions as "tasteless"?

OK, maybe I was just a little harsh. Just amazed that someone didn't get what was an extremely smart movie.

As much as I liked Unforgiven I thought it was a little too hyped.

From the media? From your friends?

I saw it in the theater, and the only thing I remember hearing is that it was serious but very good. I thought it was underhyped when I walked out.

I saw Outlaw Josie Wales when I was a kid, so I was kind of an Eastwood fan, but like I said, as good as he was (and he had some GREAT lines to deliver), I thought Hackman out-acted him. Little Bill is a fascinatingly deep/conflicted character.

Don't get me wrong. I love Unforgiven. (Duck of Earl part cracks me up)
IMHO, I thought Open Range was underrated.

I liked Open Range too, but it's more of a mood piece than a character piece, IMO.
 

weirdichi

Diamond Member
Sep 19, 2001
4,711
2
76
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

It's called creative license. You know, the whole idea of not focusing on some of the stupid things we've done in the past? Besides, the movie wasn't about Ned being black.

You can't help but notice it. There weren't many black cowboys back in those days I'm thinking, so to have NOBODY in the movie notice Ned had to raise a question. There's two sides to this: Ned was a black cowboy OR Ned was a cowboy. I just want to know which side Clint was on.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
Originally posted by: weirdichi
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

It's called creative license. You know, the whole idea of not focusing on some of the stupid things we've done in the past? Besides, the movie wasn't about Ned being black.

You can't help but notice it. There weren't many black cowboys back in those days I'm thinking, so to have NOBODY in the movie notice Ned had to raise a question. There's two sides to this: Ned was a black cowboy OR Ned was a cowboy. I just want to know which side Clint was on.

Obviously it didn't seem to matter enough for him to cast Ned with a white actor. I also noticed the fact that Ned was black and that it wasn't mentioned in the film by any of the characters. It was rather refreshing to see that actually. Nobody calling him n!gger or any other derogatory remarks. Yet another reason to applaud Eastwood IMO. :thumbsup:
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
Originally posted by: foghorn67
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Further proof that you cant teach taste.

Unforgiven is a fantastic movie with an ensemble cast. I love all the archetypical characters. Gene Hackman is as good or better than Eastwood. I love how he completely abuses that poser English Bob.

so you just label somebody that doesn't share your opinions as "tasteless"?
As much as I liked Unforgiven I thought it was a little too hyped.
There were two reasons for that: It's been years since a decent Western was out, and Clint Eastwood is a media darling. Especially then.
Don't get me wrong. I love Unforgiven. (Duck of Earl part cracks me up)
IMHO, I thought Open Range was underrated.

It was the Duck of Death, not Duck of Earl. :laugh:
 

Jadow

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2003
5,962
2
0
Great flick. They build Gene Hackman to be all bad ass, then when it's fightin time, Clint just goes apeshlt on Gene and his boys.

I'll burn your damn house down!
 

cavemanmoron

Lifer
Mar 13, 2001
13,664
28
91
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Further proof that you cant teach taste.

Unforgiven is a fantastic movie with an ensemble cast. I love all the archetypical characters. Gene Hackman is as good or better than Eastwood. I love how he completely abuses that poser English Bob.

:thumbsup:
 

Paddington

Senior member
Jun 26, 2006
538
0
0
The only good part of Unforgiven is the end, where Clint Eastwood marches into the saloon and lays waste to everyone in there.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: foghorn67
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Further proof that you cant teach taste.

Unforgiven is a fantastic movie with an ensemble cast. I love all the archetypical characters. Gene Hackman is as good or better than Eastwood. I love how he completely abuses that poser English Bob.

so you just label somebody that doesn't share your opinions as "tasteless"?
As much as I liked Unforgiven I thought it was a little too hyped.
There were two reasons for that: It's been years since a decent Western was out, and Clint Eastwood is a media darling. Especially then.
Don't get me wrong. I love Unforgiven. (Duck of Earl part cracks me up)
IMHO, I thought Open Range was underrated.

It was the Duck of Death, not Duck of Earl. :laugh:

oops. me needs to watch that movie again.:thumbsup:
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Originally posted by: foghorn67
so you just label somebody that doesn't share your opinions as "tasteless"?

OK, maybe I was just a little harsh. Just amazed that someone didn't get what was an extremely smart movie.

As much as I liked Unforgiven I thought it was a little too hyped.

From the media? From your friends?

I saw it in the theater, and the only thing I remember hearing is that it was serious but very good. I thought it was underhyped when I walked out.

I saw Outlaw Josie Wales when I was a kid, so I was kind of an Eastwood fan, but like I said, as good as he was (and he had some GREAT lines to deliver), I thought Hackman out-acted him. Little Bill is a fascinatingly deep/conflicted character.

Don't get me wrong. I love Unforgiven. (Duck of Earl part cracks me up)
IMHO, I thought Open Range was underrated.

I liked Open Range too, but it's more of a mood piece than a character piece, IMO.

I think you are right on the Unforgiven vs. Open Range. The part before the shoot out always chokes me up. I feel more involved, or I can relate more. Unforgiven, is a thing I can only observe and say 'wow'.
 
Jul 1, 2000
10,274
2
0
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Further proof that you cant teach taste.

Unforgiven is a fantastic movie with an ensemble cast. I love all the archetypical characters. Gene Hackman is as good or better than Eastwood. I love how he completely abuses that poser English Bob.

I agree. It was a classic.