Climate Research Unit hacked, damning evidence of data manipulation

[Ozoned]

We CAN'T trust this issue to the public and their opinion. Way too many zeros for them to fully grasp the situation. I HOPE they CHANGE their opinion soon or I,,,,,err,, we are doomed.

 

[IGBT]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html


And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.

Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists were manipulating data.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0faidgcx8

 

[monovillage]

Less then 3 months......... what a difference those e-mails made.

Guide to some of the errors/mistakes/lies etc. that have come out since the CRU e-mails

http://www.ocregister.com/common/printer/view.php?db=ocregister&id=234092

 

[StageLeft]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html


And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.

Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists were manipulating data.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0faidgcx8

These scientists need to stick to science and not skullduggery. What a disaster he has been.

Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing

Then any portion of it based on this data that is no longer available can be summarily thrown in the trash, especially if it's endorsed by an admitted deceiver. I assume that the hockey stick is based on more than just the junk data he doesn't have anymore, however.

 

[FerrelGeek]

I don't believe that it is. Global warming/cooling/climate change is bunk. The true believers need to deal with that. Doesn't mean that we should be stupid with our resources, but things like cap&tax should be scuttled.

 

[ElFenix]

These scientists need to stick to science and not skullduggery. What a disaster he has been.

Then any portion of it based on this data that is no longer available can be summarily thrown in the trash, especially if it's endorsed by an admitted deceiver. I assume that the hockey stick is based on more than just the junk data he doesn't have anymore, however.

if it's THE hockey stick graph, then the methodology used to produce has already been shown to produce hockey sticks with purely random data. iow, it's complete junk.

 

[WHAMPOM]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html


And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.

Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists were manipulating data.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0faidgcx8

No warming, no cooling either. But ten of those years as the warmest on record in a cool sun period. Just what are we missing here?

 

[werepossum]

I don't believe that it is. Global warming/cooling/climate change is bunk. The true believers need to deal with that. Doesn't mean that we should be stupid with our resources, but things like cap&tax should be scuttled.

If cap & tax were designed to reduce CO2 you'd have a point. It is designed to allow government the power to designate winners and losers among companies, industries, and even states and regions.

 

[WHAMPOM]

if it's THE hockey stick graph, then the methodology used to produce has already been shown to produce hockey sticks with purely random data. iow, it's complete junk.

All the weather data still exists, just not the data they used.

 

[Robor]

If cap & tax were designed to reduce CO2 you'd have a point. It is designed to allow government the power to designate winners and losers among companies, industries, and even states and regions.

/puts on tin foil hat

 

[charrison]

All the weather data still exists, just not the data they used.

If the datasets and methods they used are missing, it is not a reproducible experiment and that fails science in a big way.

 

[charrison]

All the weather data still exists, just not the data they used.

Given that china is not going sign on and they are the largest co2 emitter now, I think his point is quite valid.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

New errors in IPCC climate change report
I wonder how long the followers will stay on board the sinking ship?

I'm thinking they would rather drown than face the humiliation.