Clawhammer 3400+ benchmarks

abr27440

Junior Member
Jul 5, 2003
24
0
0
benchmarks dont sound to good, if they are true then the 2.0ghz athlon 64 is only equizlant to a p4 2.66 in 32bit windows :( not good news for amd
 

Lyfer

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,842
2
81
Originally posted by: abr27440
benchmarks dont sound to good, if they are true then the 2.0ghz athlon 64 is only equizlant to a p4 2.66 in 32bit windows :( not good news for amd



those are just synthetic benchmarks.
 

abr27440

Junior Member
Jul 5, 2003
24
0
0
true they are synthetic but they do generaly corilate with average preformance. untill apps start comming out optimised for the athlon 64 i see no reason to even consider them.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Lyfer
Originally posted by: abr27440
benchmarks dont sound to good, if they are true then the 2.0ghz athlon 64 is only equizlant to a p4 2.66 in 32bit windows :( not good news for amd



those are just synthetic benchmarks.

still, i was expecting better
 

touchmyichi

Golden Member
May 26, 2002
1,774
0
76
being its a reference board and we don't even know what vid card and ram was used, I say it did pretty good. The nforce 3 be the chipset you want though.