Clarkdale FarCry2 Benchmarks

[Hey Zeus]

1680X1050 - Medium Setting

3.2Ghz :

4Ghz :

4.6Ghz:

 

[Hauk]

[scratches head]

 

[Hey Zeus]

[scratches head]

I posted it in the wrong forum.

 

[toyota]

so this is definitely a pretty cpu intensive test since you are using medium settings and 1680 res. you do have 9600gt sli right? if so that seems a bit low and I think I could beat that with an E8500 and 192sp gtx260. your 9600gt sli setup shouldnt be too much slower than my 192sp gtx260. I wish you had a gtx260 so we could compare cpus a little more directly though.


I know this isnt really very comparable because of my faster card but I just ran it with E8500@3.8 on all medium at 1680x1050 for the heck of it.

Total Frames: 3584, Total Time: 51.01s
Average Framerate: 70.26
Max. Framerate: 98.82 (Frame:553, 6.67s)
Min. Framerate: 56.47 (Frame:2308, 32.34s)

 

[RaistlinZ]

So is the only real benefit of these over say and i5-750 the 32nm process? How would an i5 at 4.6Ghz compare? Also, what temps are you getting at 4.8Ghz?

 

[lopri]

Heh.. When I read the title I thought it was Clarkdale's IGP test. Silly me.

P.S. Can anyone verify if 2560x1600 and dual displays work (without additional hardware) on H55/H57?