Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 35,703
- 10,011
- 136
Klan sticks together.Russia, Russia, Russia. Why is it that it's almost always the Republicans enmeshed with Russia?
Klan sticks together.Russia, Russia, Russia. Why is it that it's almost always the Republicans enmeshed with Russia?
From their perspective it is theThe best supreme court money can buy.
The republican party has a major corruption problem. Why don't their voters hold them accountable? Are they afraid? They are a bunch of cowards!
Nowadays voting is easy for those who love democracy. You just have to vote for the person who isn't corrupt. They are the ones with the D next to their name.
I'd agree, but the final headlines are going to be that it didn't succeed and that's enough for most of our electorate.
In general, Mitch was generally a hawk when it came to standing up to Russia. Getting a smelting plant in your state doesn't seem to be very pro-Russia anyway, since it would effectively be infrastructure in the US.
This is all because we were told that if we didn't live up to whatever horse shit we were told that conforming to would make us great people the punishment would be eternal. Humans rationalize because language can be used to create the notion that good and evil actually exist. The practice of self realization in the infinite ways it can occur, the collapse of the illusion of duality, brings a return to the real self. As I have told you repeatedly, the human nature you think is real is only a disease.From their perspective it is theJediDemocrats who are evil.
You want to perceive things in a logical sense, as it makes sense to you. But humans DO NOT operate that way. Logic is secondary to our feelings, to our beliefs. We will believe whatever it takes to stroke our Egos. And if they imagine themselves as good old hard working patriotic Americans, then they'll drink the kool-aid and believe that Democrats have destroyed the nation and that THEY will save it from us. Through any means, including letting Vlad the Butcher pay their ticket.
Again, humans do not think rationally, as we WILL rationalize anything.
It absolutely will go somewhere. It is the truth. The mental world of human beings is a war of ideas. That world is in a state of evolution. There is only one place to go and that's straight ahead. So yes, it is an absolutely good idea to hammer on this. Those in the dark are in the dark because they fear the light. Those with the courage to face the truth will endlessly confound those who live in fear.It will absolutely go nowhere but I think it’s a good idea still. Try to generate news headlines about the corruption.
You know he is all in. Everything he says the opposite is true.It absolutely will go somewhere. It is the truth. The mental world of human beings is a war of ideas. That world is in a state of evolution. There is only one place to go and that's straight ahead. So yes, it is an absolutely good idea to hammer on this. Those in the dark are in the dark because they fear the light. Those with the courage to face the truth will endlessly confound those who live in fear.
Look how Trump is running away from Project 2025. "Who me, associated with that? No way."
He did however Mitch isn’t that pro Russia, I give him a pass on that. I still like to call him “Moscow Mitch” because winning for him and party is more important than America winning to him.Wasn’t it Mitch that tried to get the Russian aluminum plant in his home state
That's my point. It the American people ever figure out what the the revenge Presidency Trump will unleash on them really looks like the dog catcher will win. They are counting on Biden hiding the truth and allowing the Democrats to do Biden in. Victory depends of focus on focus on Biden rather than the truth about Trump. They are so grateful for Democrats doing their work for them.You know he is all in. Everything he says the opposite is true.
Cause Republicans are selling and Russia is buying.Russia, Russia, Russia. Why is it that it's almost always the Republicans enmeshed with Russia?
Wouldn't a more reasonable interpretation be 'this is probably true due to Thomas' long, documented history of doing exactly this'?I can't figure out where the two senators picked up this story. Clearly it's true because Thomas is a repbublician, but where did the information come from?
It's not an unreasonable assumption, but it also isn't an answer. I'm always more than a bit suspicious of information that comes from any site that also peddles boner pills, toe fungus cream, and supplements.Wouldn't a more reasonable interpretation be 'this is probably true due to Thomas' long, documented history of doing exactly this'?
But a more reasonable assumption than saying he's being railroaded for being a Republican, agree?It's not an unreasonable assumption, but it also isn't an answer. I'm always more than a bit suspicious of information that comes from any site that also peddles boner pills, toe fungus cream, and supplements.
That he's being railroaded is also a reasonable assumption. I've seen him referred to as an "uncle tom" right here in p&n.But a more reasonable assumption than saying he's being railroaded for being a Republican, agree?
I mean after all just look at the absolutely insane levels of corruption he's publicly admitted to.
The point is Thomas continually “forgets” to report or disclose this stuff and any other Judge in the country would face consequences. At what point is forgetting to do something incompetence?That he's being railroaded is also a reasonable assumption. I've seen him referred to as an "uncle tom" right here in p&n.
All of that is simply a smoke screen to hide the basic question, where did the evidence for these accusations originate? That's all I'm asking. I read the article, the citation is that two congressmen mentioned it. I'm good with that, where did they source the information? We're missing the who what when where and the why.
Just for the record, tossing in the "Putin's home town" to give the story a more nefarious shadow is cheap theater.
Seems pretty pointless to 'railroad' a guy for corruption that's essentially the same as the corruption he's already admitted to.That he's being railroaded is also a reasonable assumption. I've seen him referred to as an "uncle tom" right here in p&n.
It's not a smoke screen and I frankly don't care about these accusations one way or the other because... again... we already know Thomas does this sort of shit all the time!All of that is simply a smoke screen to hide the basic question, where did the evidence for these accusations originate? That's all I'm asking. I read the article, the citation is that two congressmen mentioned it. I'm good with that, where did they source the information? We're missing the who what when where and the why.
Just for the record, tossing in the "Putin's home town" to give the story a more nefarious shadow is cheap theater.
The point is Thomas continually “forgets” to report or disclose this stuff and any other Judge in the country would face consequences. At what point is forgetting to do something incompetence?
It still doesn't answer my question. An accusation was made based on some information discovered somewhere. Was it a witness who heard him list out his crimes? Was it some documentation found describing his nefarious activities?The point is Thomas continually “forgets” to report or disclose this stuff and any other Judge in the country would face consequences. At what point is forgetting to do something incompetence?
Guys this ONE time greenman is very concerned about knowing all the facts before rendering an opinion.It still doesn't answer my question. An accusation was made based on some information discovered somewhere. Was it a witness who heard him list out his crimes? Was it some documentation found describing his nefarious activities?
It's not a tough question, it's not assuming his guilt or innocence, it's just a simple "where did this come from".
So far the responses are fixated on his obvious guilt, and that's not what I asked about.
Who fucking cares how this information was discoveredIt still doesn't answer my question. An accusation was made based on some information discovered somewhere. Was it a witness who heard him list out his crimes? Was it some documentation found describing his nefarious activities?
It's not a tough question, it's not assuming his guilt or innocence, it's just a simple "where did this come from".
So far the responses are fixated on his obvious guilt, and that's not what I asked about.
He is a Supreme Court Justice. His job is to Lord over and smite down they who do not agree with The Federalist views.He is a Supreme Court judge.. his job is to know and comprehend the laws of the government... forgetting is not an option
He needs the court to make a ruling on this before forming an opinion since it's a republican.Guys this ONE time greenman is very concerned about knowing all the facts before rendering an opinion.