• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Civilization 3 question

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,809
1,990
126
Hey.

My friend and I just found Civ 3 complete. It's a great game, but we can't figure out how to make the game last beyond 2050 in multiplayer.

Anyone know how? Anyone else play this?
 

flashbacck

Golden Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,921
0
76
That might be the built in timelimit. There might be mods or cracks that will extend this. I'd check civfanatics.com. Anyway, how'd you guys last to 2050 without killing each other?
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
Go under options, I'm pretty sure there is something that lets you turn that off. I know there is an option in there somewhere, you don't have to download anything. :)
 

cdcushman

Member
Feb 23, 2005
92
0
0
thats a hard call, after mastering civ2 its just not AS fun anymore...
civ 3 and its better AI (with the patch that is) is much much harder.
I have yet to meet someone who beat it on the hardest level (sid i think)
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Civ3 was terrible compared to civ 2

Civ 2 had the worst AI of all the Civ games.
And they screwed things up with the tiles and the underwater/space areas.

Civ3 is what Civ2 should have been, they returned to the roots of Civ1 and went from there.

Civ3>>>Civ2.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Civ3 was terrible compared to civ 2

Civ 2 had the worst AI of all the Civ games.
And they screwed things up with the tiles and the underwater/space areas.

Civ3 is what Civ2 should have been, they returned to the roots of Civ1 and went from there.

Civ3>>>Civ2.

In any case, I have high hopes for civ4, which should bo out in 2k6, IIRC.

Oh, and for civ questions, check here.

But in direct response to the OP, no, I don't believe it's possible. Besides, you guys must really suck if you can't get done w/ the game by 2050 :p
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: So
But in direct response to the OP, no, I don't believe it's possible. Besides, you guys must really suck if you can't get done w/ the game by 2050 :p

Probably waiting to attack eachother until the CPU players are wiped out and not doing the space race. A Domination game like that could go on a while.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: So
But in direct response to the OP, no, I don't believe it's possible. Besides, you guys must really suck if you can't get done w/ the game by 2050 :p

Probably waiting to attack eachother until the CPU players are wiped out and not doing the space race. A Domination game like that could go on a while.

Even then. If you progress at a decent pace you should have cavalry by the 1600's at the latest and then if you wipe out your opponents one civ at a time, you should have no problem finishing by the 2050's