- Oct 22, 2000
- 24,514
- 44
- 91
I got to thinking about this on the way home tonight, driving through the fake "country" of Kent/Covington Washington, outside of Seattle.
I have a friend who is steadfast in her insistence that she grew up in a "small town"...of 15,000 people (according to Wikipedia).
This is 15-30 times the size of what I consider to be a "small town", in fact, it's roughly the size of the average large suburb where I grew up. I grew up in a village of 4,500 and considered it to be a large town and definitely more "city" than "country".
This got me thinking about where the cut-off was for other people. So what's the threshold for something to be the "country" for you?
No poll, I want to hear thoughts too; not just answers.
ZV
I have a friend who is steadfast in her insistence that she grew up in a "small town"...of 15,000 people (according to Wikipedia).
This is 15-30 times the size of what I consider to be a "small town", in fact, it's roughly the size of the average large suburb where I grew up. I grew up in a village of 4,500 and considered it to be a large town and definitely more "city" than "country".
This got me thinking about where the cut-off was for other people. So what's the threshold for something to be the "country" for you?
No poll, I want to hear thoughts too; not just answers.
ZV
