I think it's an explanation of a short passage from the bible.
Judging people is a necessity if one intends to live amongst others. Problems occur when that judgement becomes contempt or hate for wide swaths of people. That's a problem that will never be resolved because hate is one of the things humans do very well. The problem now is that there is no shame in hate, we're proud of the our hate and announce it to the world. We revel in our hate and encourage others to hate along with us. We even tell lies and half truths to each other to help justify our hate.
In the grand scheme of things people are a pretty shitty group. We'll end up killing our selves long before we learn how to behave.
This is right in like with what I have been trying to tell you. I know people are hateful and that makes them judgmental with all the intent of hating those they judge. That it is an addiction and arises out of having learned in childhood how to hate by being hated.
I a saying your moral values that find hatred repugnant are in a way also a form of hate. You hate what haters do but it comes from the same place.
You are like a liberal. Your sympathies are in the right place, with the victims, in this case of hate, and not the perpetrators of it.
I simply see your moral values while deeply moral in fact, are emotionally tainted by the same issue, that you feel contempt for judgmental hateful people and fail to see they react just like you do, with contempt for the evil that judge to be present in others and their use of that as a way to rationalize their hate.
If judgment is required then we can have good judgement and bad judgement. And we can have judgment that is objective and judgement that is irrational. That means we can have good judgement that is objective and good judgement that is accompanied by irrational bias, we can have bad judgement that is based on sound values and bad judgement that is irrational.
I think your judgement in this thread that the world is full of judgmental haters is sound. But their judgment can be objective and rational for some as well as hateful from many others. I think you tend to overlook that end of things.
One can say what happened in Miami stinks to the high heavens and render that judgment as factual without hatred being the motivation. The presence of haters does not change that. A bias against bias is only as good as that the bias against which you are biased is actually biased. I think you always assume it is because it is so often true.
This puts you at constant opposite ends of willingness to look at the facts rather than how others perceive them. You tend always to react as if all liberal judgment is motivated by hate and you stop your analysis there. That is a given. Look at the facts themselves. There are liberals here that are really good at that in my opinion. Some are pretty nasty, but some not so much. Maybe put some effort into seeing what they see and less in automatically rejecting data presented judgmentally.