Citi now below $1.. I hope they burn.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 4644
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 4644

Citi is a company built on illegality and fraud. When it merged with Travelers in 1998, the merger was technically a violation of U.S. law, a law which was then gutted by the Republican Congress and Bill Clinton the following year, leading to dozens of unholy mergers of I-banks and savings and loans.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,568
126
actually, it wasn't a technical violation of US law. the bank holding company act allowed 2 years for a company that became a bank holding company to divest itself of operations not permissible for a bank holding company. there were an additional 3 one-year exemptions that could be taken advantage of, allowing up to 5 years.

not to mention the provisions of glass-steagall that were reworked by gramm-leach-bliley were considered to be a competitive disadvantage for america vs european operations.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.
I loled, and yes that is the bank that the gov now owns 36% of.

 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.

Government isn't supposed to make sound private investments.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Citi is buying most of my low-rate mortgages right now. It wouldnt be good for people with great jobs/credit if they went down completely. (Not that I think we should be funneling them cash, either)
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Citi is buying most of my low-rate mortgages right now. It wouldnt be good for people with great jobs/credit if they went down completely. (Not that I think we should be funneling them cash, either)

you mean if they went down completely prior to closing? i thought once the property is closed upon, the lender going down wont really affect the homeowner.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Citi is buying most of my low-rate mortgages right now. It wouldnt be good for people with great jobs/credit if they went down completely. (Not that I think we should be funneling them cash, either)

you mean if they went down completely prior to closing? i thought once the property is closed upon, the lender going down wont really affect the homeowner.

No people who are already closed are fine, Im just saying they are a major player. It would leave Chase, Countrywide, and Wells basically. (This is on the wholesale channel)
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: Deleted member 4644
Citi is a company built on illegality and fraud. When it merged with Travelers in 1998, the merger was technically a violation of U.S. law, a law which was then gutted by the Republican Congress and Bill Clinton the following year, leading to dozens of unholy mergers of I-banks and savings and loans.

Get your facts straight before foaming at the mouth please... wishing for large US companies to go down is just dumb.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Deleted member 4644
Citi now below $1.. I hope they burn.
Rush...is that you?
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,987
4,596
126
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.
Bush should be proud. The US government is finally into the stock market. He was just 8 years early with the idea.
 

Kwatt

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2000
1,602
12
81
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.

Government isn't supposed to make sound private investments.

Them seem to be hitting the Bullseye.

.
 

Dear Summer

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2008
1,015
1
71
so can I do a balance transfer of all my debt to my citi credit card and hope it disappears?

it's a joke
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Originally posted by: Deleted member 4644
Citi now below $1.. I hope they burn.

They have somewhere north of 300k employees, a great percentage of those in the NYC metro area? Either way, if somewhere has to lose jobs at least it's New York.
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.

Government isn't supposed to make sound private investments.

Which explains why our government made that "investment".

-Robert

 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: glenn1
Originally posted by: Deleted member 4644
Citi now below $1.. I hope they burn.

They have somewhere north of 300k employees, a great percentage of those in the NYC metro area? Either way, if somewhere has to lose jobs at least it's New York.

:roll:
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,137
225
106
"banks are too big to fail" Mission accomplished!

Well...... The sad part is we will bail them out again maybe own up 70% of that bank. Look the System is REALLY BROKEN. Black Friday really could be tomorrow! Or was it black Monday? This is getting scary and I really think we should let these big banks fail how much can we lend them till we own the entire system before it collapses? I don't know what to say. But we can't keep bailing out these insurance, banking and auto industries. They need to fail the system needs to correct itself ... Yes it's going to get ugly but at least it won't be as ugly as throwing away another 90 billion at a bank or industry that is just going to fail anyway. We are already in too deep... Put your boots on the shit is getting deeper by the day.

 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.
Sure, if you like 1-2% growth a year. It may not fail but it's going to grow at the rate of coal --> diamond.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.
I loled, and yes that is the bank that the gov now owns 36% of.

It's valued at 1% right now because the gov't is going to take it over/nationalize is. Extinguish all investor wealth.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,863
3,295
136
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Genx87
Isnt this the bank the US govt just bought a 36% stake in? Looks like a sound investment.
I loled, and yes that is the bank that the gov now owns 36% of.

It's valued at 1% right now because the gov't is going to take it over/nationalize is. Extinguish all investor wealth.

gotta love it when people state their opinion as fact.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Is it better to buy a Double Cheeseburger at McDonalds or is it better to buy a share of Citibank stock? Which has more value?

Which is greater? The dollar value of Citibank's total amount of stock or the dollar value of Citibank's CEO's salary, bonuses, stock options, and golden parachute?
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,863
3,295
136
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper

Is it better to buy a Double Cheeseburger at McDonalds or is it better to buy a share of Citibank stock? Which has more value?

in the end they are both shit ;)