Circumcision

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Weird, I work in a general hospital in the UK and I've never (in 15 years or so) seen any infants/young children with those problems due to not being circumcised. I can ask around if you'd like.

Where do you work in the hospital? Unless you're in the ED/Peds, I wouldn't be surprised. Not sure what your population is like either, there are quite a few poor/dumb people who make poor/dumb parents in Southern Florida.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,205
11,372
136
Where do you work in the hospital? Unless you're in the ED/Peds, I wouldn't be surprised. Not sure what your population is like either, there are quite a few poor/dumb people who make poor/dumb parents in Southern Florida.


I work in A&E a fair bit and its a big general hospital serving both rural and city locations.

I don't want to get into the anatomy of the paediatric penis but there's a few reasons why what you say shouldn't be a problem.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Considering the health conditions that existed in the world as a whole, and in the Middle East in particular, when the Jewish tradition of circumcision began, and the fact that one who is not circumcised should go to a little extra effort in the cleaning department, I would beg to differ with your assertion.

But not enough to actually argue about it.

MotionMan

In principle, I would agree with you, but citing those very same "hygienic" conditions of the period, the procedure probably did more harm than good due to infection and such. It probably raised mortality rates a good few percent on its own.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,994
34,203
136
I'm working on a Dartz Prombron retrofit for my station wagon. If folks stop this practice I'll never get enough material to finish.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
It was not originally promoted for hygenic reasons but to discourage masturbation. 1920's social control.
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,949
573
126
It was not originally promoted for hygenic reasons but to discourage masturbation. 1920's social control.
There is no evidence it was promoted to any substantial degree by mainstream conventional medical practice or recommendation. In fact, it was a sufficiently controversial recommendation among mainstream conventional medicine. Even the era's advocates for circumcision as a treatment for EXCESSIVE masturbation (not as prophylaxis to prevent masturbation) noted the practice was done primarily for hygiene and health reasons. And circumcision in Western societies predates 1920 by...umm...a few hundred years.
 
Last edited:

AreaCode707

Lifer
Sep 21, 2001
18,447
133
106
A physical symbol that identified and helped hold together a disenfranchised ethnic population that for most of its' history was dispersed in other countries under foreign ruler? Yeah, what possible practical use could that ever have served in maintaining an ethnic identity?
 

Silent Guy

Junior Member
Jul 5, 2006
4
0
0
Like mentioned earlier, it greatly reduces the risk of contracting HIV.

In what situation? In a country such as the USA, the numbers needed to treat to prevent one HIV infection would be extremely high, which is an issue when you consider the complications from the anaestestic or haemorrhage. In Africa in may prove effective, but once again the rate of complications would need to be considered. Safe sex through the use of condoms is still the gold standard of preventing HIV infections.