Circumcision Poll

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Okay they say being uncircumcised makes sex more sensitive that means your son won?t last 30 seconds. I don?t know about any of you but my john Thomas is sensitive enough. I am willing to sacrifice some sensitivity for a longer run.

It would be interesting to poll European and Mexican men, as very few of them are cut. We'd see if they're truly 30 second wonders as you suggest.

YOU are the one suggesting it by saying uncircs are so much more sensitive.

Sensitivity != finishing sooner. I have way more sensitivity after a little foreskin restoration and I last a lot longer. So my wife and I have longer sex and I enjoy it a lot more.

I?m going to have to say Shens. Also have you heard that saying misery loves company? I have to wonder why you are so adamant about pushing this. Do you like the talk about mens wankers or does misery truly love company?

Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

 

[jlee]

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well..in all honesty, Mosh -- hair keeps growing. 😛

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: CadetLee

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well..in all honesty, Mosh -- hair keeps growing. 😛

yes, but. . . he is cutting off part of himself.
there is a parallel there.

 

[HBalzer]

Originally posted by: CadetLee

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well..in all honesty, Mosh -- hair keeps growing. 😛

not for all men!

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: CadetLee

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well..in all honesty, Mosh -- hair keeps growing. 😛

not for all men!

true!!!!

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Okay they say being uncircumcised makes sex more sensitive that means your son won?t last 30 seconds. I don?t know about any of you but my john Thomas is sensitive enough. I am willing to sacrifice some sensitivity for a longer run.

It would be interesting to poll European and Mexican men, as very few of them are cut. We'd see if they're truly 30 second wonders as you suggest.

YOU are the one suggesting it by saying uncircs are so much more sensitive.

Sensitivity != finishing sooner. I have way more sensitivity after a little foreskin restoration and I last a lot longer. So my wife and I have longer sex and I enjoy it a lot more.

I?m going to have to say Shens. Also have you heard that saying misery loves company? I have to wonder why you are so adamant about pushing this. Do you like the talk about mens wankers or does misery truly love company?

Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

Victimized as an infant?

Please.

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Okay they say being uncircumcised makes sex more sensitive that means your son won?t last 30 seconds. I don?t know about any of you but my john Thomas is sensitive enough. I am willing to sacrifice some sensitivity for a longer run.

It would be interesting to poll European and Mexican men, as very few of them are cut. We'd see if they're truly 30 second wonders as you suggest.

YOU are the one suggesting it by saying uncircs are so much more sensitive.

Sensitivity != finishing sooner. I have way more sensitivity after a little foreskin restoration and I last a lot longer. So my wife and I have longer sex and I enjoy it a lot more.

I?m going to have to say Shens. Also have you heard that saying misery loves company? I have to wonder why you are so adamant about pushing this. Do you like the talk about mens wankers or does misery truly love company?

Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Okay they say being uncircumcised makes sex more sensitive that means your son won?t last 30 seconds. I don?t know about any of you but my john Thomas is sensitive enough. I am willing to sacrifice some sensitivity for a longer run.

It would be interesting to poll European and Mexican men, as very few of them are cut. We'd see if they're truly 30 second wonders as you suggest.

YOU are the one suggesting it by saying uncircs are so much more sensitive.

Sensitivity != finishing sooner. I have way more sensitivity after a little foreskin restoration and I last a lot longer. So my wife and I have longer sex and I enjoy it a lot more.

I?m going to have to say Shens. Also have you heard that saying misery loves company? I have to wonder why you are so adamant about pushing this. Do you like the talk about mens wankers or does misery truly love company?

Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Okay they say being uncircumcised makes sex more sensitive that means your son won?t last 30 seconds. I don?t know about any of you but my john Thomas is sensitive enough. I am willing to sacrifice some sensitivity for a longer run.

It would be interesting to poll European and Mexican men, as very few of them are cut. We'd see if they're truly 30 second wonders as you suggest.

YOU are the one suggesting it by saying uncircs are so much more sensitive.

Sensitivity != finishing sooner. I have way more sensitivity after a little foreskin restoration and I last a lot longer. So my wife and I have longer sex and I enjoy it a lot more.

I?m going to have to say Shens. Also have you heard that saying misery loves company? I have to wonder why you are so adamant about pushing this. Do you like the talk about mens wankers or does misery truly love company?

Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3
Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

Sorry, I was asking Mosh.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3
Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

Sorry, I was asking Mosh.

Sorry, I answerd your damned question anyway.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Okay they say being uncircumcised makes sex more sensitive that means your son won?t last 30 seconds. I don?t know about any of you but my john Thomas is sensitive enough. I am willing to sacrifice some sensitivity for a longer run.

It would be interesting to poll European and Mexican men, as very few of them are cut. We'd see if they're truly 30 second wonders as you suggest.

YOU are the one suggesting it by saying uncircs are so much more sensitive.

Sensitivity != finishing sooner. I have way more sensitivity after a little foreskin restoration and I last a lot longer. So my wife and I have longer sex and I enjoy it a lot more.

I?m going to have to say Shens. Also have you heard that saying misery loves company? I have to wonder why you are so adamant about pushing this. Do you like the talk about mens wankers or does misery truly love company?

Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

haircuts man, do you get your haircut?

if so, you are not whole.

Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

If it's necessary, how have I survived 22 years without it? 😕

 

[Platypus]

Hey it's AT's favorite topic: penises!

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: hjo3
My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

So do you think there are any negative effects from remaining intact?

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3
Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

Sorry, I was asking Mosh.

Sorry, I answerd your damned question anyway.

See, that's why I wanted to talk to Mosh instead.

 

[HBalzer]

In all honesty I think you were lousy in bed and needed an excuse so you blame the doctors and your circ as your scapegoat. I?m circ sex is great and as the saying goes if it aint?t broke don?t fix it.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: hjo3
My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

So do you think there are any negative effects from remaining intact?

Yes.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3
Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

Sorry, I was asking Mosh.

Sorry, I answerd your damned question anyway.

See, that's why I wanted to talk to Mosh instead.

Be a jerk, I be one back. kthxbye

 

[nakedfrog]

Originally posted by: EatSpam
Everyone has to have a cause. My cause is the human rights of men to have a whole body. I was victimized as an infant along with most of my peers. I want to end that.

I'm in great company, too.... Google "intactivism"... I'm FAR from alone, plus, if you read through the posts, there are many people who agree with me.

How about taking a passive education approach rather than a brute force legislative approach?
Again, fanatics are the ones who do their own cause the most harm.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: HBalzer
In all honesty I think you were lousy in bed and needed an excuse so you blame the doctors and your circ as your scapegoat. I?m circ sex is great and as the saying goes if it aint?t broke don?t fix it.

There may be some truth to that. I do think he has some psychological problems with sex, maybe even some abuse.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: hjo3
My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

So do you think there are any negative effects from remaining intact?

Yes.

And there are negative effects from being cut as well..

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3
Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

Sorry, I was asking Mosh.

Sorry, I answerd your damned question anyway.

See, that's why I wanted to talk to Mosh instead.

Be a jerk, I be one back. kthxbye

I wasn't being a jerk. I just don't want to get involved in your name-calling stuff. Mosh at least seems capable of being polite to people with different opinions.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: CadetLee

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: hjo3
My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

So do you think there are any negative effects from remaining intact?

Yes.

And there are negative effects from being cut as well..

Like? I've not experienced anything negative due to being circumcised.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3
Well that's a bit different... you don't have nerve endings in your hair.

My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

no.

Sorry, I was asking Mosh.

Sorry, I answerd your damned question anyway.

See, that's why I wanted to talk to Mosh instead.

Be a jerk, I be one back. kthxbye

I wasn't being a jerk. I just don't want to get involved in your name-calling stuff. Mosh at least seems capable of being polite to people with different opinions.

I posted an opinion and....well nevermind you probably don't understand anyway.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: CadetLee

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: hjo3
My only real objection to circumcision is that it's an unnecessary surgery... do you agree with that?

it has benefits so some would say it is necessary.

So do you think there are any negative effects from remaining intact?

Yes.

And there are negative effects from being cut as well..

Like? I've not experienced anything negative due to being circumcised.

If you were cut as a baby (which I assume you were - not going to bother rereading the thread), you wouldn't know the difference - just as I wasn't cut, and I don't know the difference. However, others have mentioned a loss of sensitivity, not to mention the risk, however slight, of a surgical mistake. Yes, it happens.

You still have the fact that the parents are making a choice on something that isn't really theirs.