circumcised? Your risk of hetrosexually transmitted HIV just went down by 70%

[EatSpam]

Originally posted by: DidlySquat
Facts:

1. Most men who were circumcised at birth are happy to have been circumcised.
2. Most circumcised men decide to circumcise their sons.
3. Most uncut adult men want to be circumcized, but don't because of the procedure involved.

Links for your "facts". And if #3 were the case, circ rates in Europe and Japan would be a lot higher.

 

[imported_Tomato]

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: DidlySquat
Facts:

1. Most men who were circumcised at birth are happy to have been circumcised.
2. Most circumcised men decide to circumcise their sons.
3. Most uncut adult men want to be circumcized, but don't because of the procedure involved.

Links for your "facts". And if #3 were the case, circ rates in Europe and Japan would be a lot higher.

DidlySquat is just squirting sh!t out of his butt.

90% of men in Europe are uncut, as are most of the men in the world. They're VERY happy being uncut and more sensitive/less hard and rubbery as they age.

Only America continues to perpetuate the mutilation of baby boys.

And once again, ALL THE FEMALES I KNOW PREFER UNCUT. My fiance is 5" when soft (uncut), and he's absolutely perfect for me.

 

[DidlySquat]

All the people you know are 5 feet tall 5" penis ricer boys that hit old ladies crossing the street without having insurance

 

[meltdown75]

Originally posted by: Tomato

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: DidlySquat
Facts:

1. Most men who were circumcised at birth are happy to have been circumcised.
2. Most circumcised men decide to circumcise their sons.
3. Most uncut adult men want to be circumcized, but don't because of the procedure involved.

Links for your "facts". And if #3 were the case, circ rates in Europe and Japan would be a lot higher.

DidlySquat is just squirting sh!t out of his butt.

90% of men in Europe are uncut, as are most of the men in the world. They're VERY happy being uncut and more sensitive/less hard and rubbery as they age.

Only America continues to perpetuate the mutilation of baby boys.

And once again, ALL THE FEMALES I KNOW PREFER UNCUT. My fiance is 5" when soft (uncut), and he's absolutely perfect for me.

Something tells me you are determined to get the last word in on this issue...

 

[meltdown75]

Originally posted by: DidlySquat
All the people you know are 5 feet tall 5" penis ricer boys that hit old ladies crossing the street without having insurance

LOL that's gotta be one of the trolliest posts in the history of posts! LOL

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: DidlySquat
All the people you know are 5 feet tall 5" penis ricer boys that hit old ladies crossing the street without having insurance

LOL that's gotta be one of the trolliest posts in the history of posts! LOL

Hahaha, I was thinking the same thing.

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: Tomato

DidlySquat is just squirting sh!t out of his butt.

90% of men in Europe are uncut, as are most of the men in the world. They're VERY happy being uncut and more sensitive/less hard and rubbery as they age.

Only America continues to perpetuate the mutilation of baby boys.

And once again, ALL THE FEMALES I KNOW PREFER UNCUT. My fiance is 5" when soft (uncut), and he's absolutely perfect for me.

I think most guys know not to believe you for your sex/relationship advice. Your past is well, shady.

Does your fiance know of your, um, loose history?

I recall that in another thread, you didn't deny that you were a woman of ill report when you were younger. You just said you "changed".

 

[sxr7171]

Originally posted by: Noriaki
http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/

(There are some pictures at that link that may be NSFW...but they are medical oriented not porn-oriented, I apologize if they are seen as inappropriate)

A few things:

One: There are many nerves in the foreskin. I would not say this is comparable to so called "female circumcision", but many pleasure nerves are lost in a circumcised male.

Two: The "skin" on the glans of an uncircumcised penis does callous or get rougher, in fact there is no skin on the glans. Uncircumcised penises grow a thin layer of keratin to protect them. Does this reduce sensitivity? Possibly...but without having two penises personally with which to compare I don't feel confident making that assessment.

Three: One of the foreskin's functions is to stimulate the female g-spot. Does this cause women to be more likely to orgasm? Hell if I know, but there it is.


On the other hand, this is a website, so what good are they really as a source of information? About as good as un-peer-reviewed "studies".

It is the circumsized penis that is more likely to keratinize as a result of rubbing against underwear all the time. The uncircumsized penis does not need to as it is always protected by foreskin.

 

[91TTZ]

It seems like the uncircumsized guys in here are really defensive about their anatomy, as if they have an inferiority complex.

Honestly, I don't care. If I wasn't circumcized as a baby I probably wouldn't get it done since it sounds painful. But to hear the guys getting all defensive about it and pointing to websites, that's just pathetic.

 

[maziwanka]

this thread is nasty

nasty like a circumsized penis

 

[moshquerade]

to each his own. arguing about it isn't going to change anyone's opinion.

those who have been circumsized and are happy about it, and i'll venture that's most of them, don't feel they have been mutilated.

 

[meltdown75]

Originally posted by: moshquerade
to each his own. arguing about it isn't going to change anyone's opinion.

those who have been circumsized and are happy about it, and i'll venture that's most of them, don't feel they have been mutilated.

QFT! That's all she wrote. Let it die you penis-happy fools!

 

[EatSpam]

Originally posted by: moshquerade
to each his own. arguing about it isn't going to change anyone's opinion.

those who have been circumsized and are happy about it, and i'll venture that's most of them, don't feel they have been mutilated.

I'd say most of the guys who are happy about their mutilations are just ignorant. I was indifferent about mine until I learned exactly what that butcher chopped off. I hope at least a few of the people reading these kinds of threads will get curious enough to learn about it so they won't make a mistake with their future sons.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: moshquerade
to each his own. arguing about it isn't going to change anyone's opinion.

those who have been circumsized and are happy about it, and i'll venture that's most of them, don't feel they have been mutilated.

I'd say most of the guys who are happy about their mutilations are just ignorant. I was indifferent about mine until I learned exactly what that butcher chopped off. I hope at least a few of the people reading these kinds of threads will get curious enough to learn about it so they won't make a mistake with their future sons.

you really shouldn't call others ignorant. it makes you seem so.

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
It seems like the uncircumsized guys in here are really defensive about their anatomy, as if they have an inferiority complex.

Honestly, I don't care. If I wasn't circumcized as a baby I probably wouldn't get it done since it sounds painful. But to hear the guys getting all defensive about it and pointing to websites, that's just pathetic.

What's more sad is that guys who haven't been mutilated are being crapped on and told that they're not "normal," and then when they try to point out that it isn't all that bad to be left intact, they get a response like this.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: ProviaFan

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
It seems like the uncircumsized guys in here are really defensive about their anatomy, as if they have an inferiority complex.

Honestly, I don't care. If I wasn't circumcized as a baby I probably wouldn't get it done since it sounds painful. But to hear the guys getting all defensive about it and pointing to websites, that's just pathetic.

What's more sad is that guys who haven't been mutilated are being crapped on and told that they're not "normal," and then when they try to point out that it isn't all that bad to be left intact, they get a response like this.

for all of you who persist in calling a circumcision mutilation, here is the definition of mutilation from dictionary.com.

mu·ti·late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
-To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
-To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
-To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.


therefore a circumcision is not mutilation.

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: ProviaFan

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
It seems like the uncircumsized guys in here are really defensive about their anatomy, as if they have an inferiority complex.

Honestly, I don't care. If I wasn't circumcized as a baby I probably wouldn't get it done since it sounds painful. But to hear the guys getting all defensive about it and pointing to websites, that's just pathetic.

What's more sad is that guys who haven't been mutilated are being crapped on and told that they're not "normal," and then when they try to point out that it isn't all that bad to be left intact, they get a response like this.

for all of you who persist in calling a circumcision mutilation, here is the definition of mutilation from dictionary.com.

mu·ti·late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
-To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
-To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
-To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.


therefore a circumcision is not mutilation.

I can't believe I'm going to post here. But I must.

It's your OPINION that it is not a mutilation.

I believe that circumcision DOES disfigure by damaging irreparably, and DOES make it imperfect by excising or altering parts.

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: moshquerade
for all of you who persist in calling a circumcision mutilation, here is the definition of mutilation from dictionary.com.

mu·ti·late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
-To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
-To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
-To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.

therefore a circumcision is not mutilation.

So circumcision does not involve excising or altering parts? Is nothing removed from the body during a circumcision?

 

[The Green Bean]

One life, one wife

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: GeekDrew

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: ProviaFan

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
It seems like the uncircumsized guys in here are really defensive about their anatomy, as if they have an inferiority complex.

Honestly, I don't care. If I wasn't circumcized as a baby I probably wouldn't get it done since it sounds painful. But to hear the guys getting all defensive about it and pointing to websites, that's just pathetic.

What's more sad is that guys who haven't been mutilated are being crapped on and told that they're not "normal," and then when they try to point out that it isn't all that bad to be left intact, they get a response like this.

for all of you who persist in calling a circumcision mutilation, here is the definition of mutilation from dictionary.com.

mu·ti·late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
-To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
-To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
-To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.


therefore a circumcision is not mutilation.

I can't believe I'm going to post here. But I must.

It's your OPINION that it is not a mutilation.

I believe that circumcision DOES disfigure by damaging irreparably, and DOES make it imperfect by excising or altering parts.

i don't. the penis is not damaged. it works fine.
yes, the parts are altered but there still is perfection.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: ProviaFan

Originally posted by: moshquerade
for all of you who persist in calling a circumcision mutilation, here is the definition of mutilation from dictionary.com.

mu·ti·late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
-To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
-To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
-To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.

therefore a circumcision is not mutilation.

So circumcision does not involve excising or altering parts? Is nothing removed from the body during a circumcision?

yes there is excising of parts (actually it's a piece not a part), but it is not made imperfect. please read the whole definition.

 

[DidlySquat]

Believe it or not, natural does not mean perfect, that's why people try to improve their appearance with makeup, cosmetic surgeires, implants, shaving of hair, makeup, etc. Whatever you want to call it, altering the appearance of the male organ is just the same thing, except that it also has health benefits.

 

[EatSpam]

Originally posted by: ProviaFan

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
It seems like the uncircumsized guys in here are really defensive about their anatomy, as if they have an inferiority complex.

Honestly, I don't care. If I wasn't circumcized as a baby I probably wouldn't get it done since it sounds painful. But to hear the guys getting all defensive about it and pointing to websites, that's just pathetic.

What's more sad is that guys who haven't been mutilated are being crapped on and told that they're not "normal," and then when they try to point out that it isn't all that bad to be left intact, they get a response like this.

QFT

 

[EatSpam]

Originally posted by: ProviaFan

Originally posted by: moshquerade
for all of you who persist in calling a circumcision mutilation, here is the definition of mutilation from dictionary.com.

mu·ti·late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
-To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
-To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
-To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.

therefore a circumcision is not mutilation.

So circumcision does not involve excising or altering parts? Is nothing removed from the body during a circumcision?

Shhh... he's in denial about his disfigurement at the hands of his parents and thier butcher/doctor.

 

[GeekDrew]

perfect (adj.)
1. Lacking nothing essential to the whole; complete of its nature or kind.
2. Being without defect or blemish: a perfect specimen.
3. Thoroughly skilled or talented in a certain field or area; proficient.
4. Completely suited for a particular purpose or situation: She was the perfect actress for the part.
5. a. Completely corresponding to a description, standard, or type: a perfect circle; a perfect gentleman.
b. Accurately reproducing an original: a perfect copy of the painting.
6. Complete; thorough; utter: a perfect fool.
7. Pure; undiluted; unmixed: perfect red.
8. Excellent and delightful in all respects: a perfect day.
9. Botany. Having both stamens and pistils in the same flower; monoclinous.
10. Grammar. Of, relating to, or constituting a verb form expressing action completed prior to a fixed point of reference in time.
11. Music. Designating the three basic intervals of the octave, fourth, and fifth.

According to 5 (inclusively, 5(b)), a circumsized penis is not perfect: it is NOT as was designed, and is not an "original".