Cindy Sheehan

JNC458

Member
Oct 26, 2005
48
0
0
Is it only me or are other people sick of hearing about her? Just when I think she is out of my face for good, there she is again. OK Cindy, go ahead & tie yourself to the White House fence . I'm sure President Bush will definately bring them all home then, doubletime. Don't get me wrong, I am all for her right to protest. I'm even sure that if I lost one of my children for any reason, I would lose my mind as she has. Here is my question: Would we be hearing about her if her son had NOT died in the war? Do you think she would care about OTHER people's children who have died in this war? Somehow I think not. Sadly she is using this tragedy to her benefit. Her son Casey's grave doesn't even have a headstone. Some grieving mother. Thats all I have.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: JNC458
Sadly she is using this tragedy to her benefit.

Agreed. Hashed and rehashed a few hundred times over the last couple months here, as well.

Welcome to AT P&N.
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
Even with the deference you (and I) must give to a woman who has lost as son the way she has, her body language, speeches and overall behavior have disgusted me thoroughly...


IMO she has passed from losing credibility to deserving some degree of ire for her actions and words, and attention whoring.
 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Tired of hearing about her? I never do except in the daily right wing Sheehan bash thread. GHet over her guys, I know her story makes your man look small, but she is just one person and not the Devil.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
She is not doing this for a right-wing popularity contest, she is spreading a message and I for one respect her and her courage, the typical american does grow tired quickly of a cause but unlike her the fight is not over when you flip the channel.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Of course, well, it took 33 minutes this time for an obfuscation.

The "news" from "PlameGate" is that the MSM has nothing, except "secret sources" and, while they've been parroting "Indictments possibly coming..." for days on end now, nothing new.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: Pabster
Of course, well, it took 33 minutes this time for an obfuscation.

The "news" from "PlameGate" is that the MSM has nothing, except "secret sources" and, while they've been parroting "Indictments possibly coming..." for days on end now, nothing new.
LOL! YESS!! I love it with the quotes!!! you remembered!

 

HardWarrior

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
4,400
23
81
Interesting. You smartasses swallow an illegal, unnecessary and racist "war" without batting an eyelash. But let one person remind you of the real, human costs of the BS and you?re whining like babies and dreaming of a US without a 1st amendment.

Disgusting.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: OrByte
In other news...

anything new from the "PlameGate" front?

That is unrelated to this thread
you COULD be right except for the fact that I was inferring that Cindy Sheehan is no longer newsworthy and THEREFORE we should move onto more...interesting news events.

maybe that helps?
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Interesting. You smartasses swallow an illegal, unnecessary and racist "war" without batting an eyelash. But let one person remind you of the real, human costs of the BS and you?re whining like babies and dreaming of a US without a 1st amendment.

Disgusting.

You're incorrect.

You're assuming that we believe this is an "illegal, unnecessary and racist war" and still approve. That's your description, not mine. If it were mine, I would not approve either.

I am not dreaming about the US without a first ammendment, I am making an observation about this particular woman.



You are describing it as something that it is not. For you to turn my opinion of her behavior into me wishing there was no first ammendment shows how much you are willing to assign motivations based on absolutely no evidence. Perhaps this extremely sloppy reasoning carries over into other areas and helps to explain some of your other absurd conclusions.


By the way, I did not support the idea of going into Iraq initially, and you have no idea about my opinions towards the war. This is about Cindy Sheehan. Obfuscation really is the correct term to describe the way several of you have posted here.

It seems there is an inability to address the actual comments made and instead red herrings, straw men or whatever other logical fallacy in a sea of them are used to respond to or divert from the topic.

Lowers any credence that should be given to your postings.







 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
Originally posted by: OrByte
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: OrByte
In other news...

anything new from the "PlameGate" front?

That is unrelated to this thread
you COULD be right except for the fact that I was inferring that Cindy Sheehan is no longer newsworthy and THEREFORE we should move onto more...interesting news events.

maybe that helps?


I don't think you were inferring something quite that genuine and innocent
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: OrByte
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: OrByte
In other news...

anything new from the "PlameGate" front?

That is unrelated to this thread
you COULD be right except for the fact that I was inferring that Cindy Sheehan is no longer newsworthy and THEREFORE we should move onto more...interesting news events.

maybe that helps?


I don't think you were inferring something quite that genuine and innocent
well you are entitled to feel that way. Sheehan fights for your right to feel that way! :)

 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
I think actually, I try not to let feelings dictate my actions or opinions. Animals feel, humans are different because we have the capacity for reason. (Some less than others.)

;)
 

JNC458

Member
Oct 26, 2005
48
0
0
BUT would she care? Would she be protesting for other peoples children or loved ones that died in the war, had her son not died? Because it happened to HER, she now cares. Im just wondering who agrees with that. I'm trying to sympathize with her, but to think that she is exploiting her dead son, and using this whole media circus to her benefit is really a sad thing.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: JNC458
Is it only me or are other people sick of hearing about her? Just when I think she is out of my face for good, there she is again. OK Cindy, go ahead & tie yourself to the White House fence . I'm sure President Bush will definately bring them all home then, doubletime. Don't get me wrong, I am all for her right to protest. I'm even sure that if I lost one of my children for any reason, I would lose my mind as she has. Here is my question: Would we be hearing about her if her son had NOT died in the war? Do you think she would care about OTHER people's children who have died in this war? Somehow I think not. Sadly she is using this tragedy to her benefit. Her son Casey's grave doesn't even have a headstone. Some grieving mother. Thats all I have.

Actually, the first I've heard of her today was in this post, from you. Thanks a lot. :cookie:
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Sheehan's using tragedy to her benefit?

I guess she'll fit right in at the Bush administration.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sheehan's using tragedy to her benefit?

I guess she'll fit right in at the Bush administration.

And you're using this tragedy to further your cause, so count yourself in!
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: JNC458
Is it only me or are other people sick of hearing about her? Just when I think she is out of my face for good, there she is again. OK Cindy, go ahead & tie yourself to the White House fence . I'm sure President Bush will definately bring them all home then, doubletime. Don't get me wrong, I am all for her right to protest. I'm even sure that if I lost one of my children for any reason, I would lose my mind as she has. Here is my question: Would we be hearing about her if her son had NOT died in the war? Do you think she would care about OTHER people's children who have died in this war? Somehow I think not. Sadly she is using this tragedy to her benefit. Her son Casey's grave doesn't even have a headstone. Some grieving mother. Thats all I have.
are we out of occupied New Orleans yet? :confused: